Post

Orla Joelsen
Orla Joelsen@OJoelsen·
Denmark prepared for a possible U.S. attack: Flew blood supplies to Greenland and planned to blow up runways Key sources in Denmark and Europe are now revealing for the first time what happened during the most critical days, when Donald Trump threatened to take Greenland “the hard way.” When Danish soldiers were rapidly deployed to Greenland in January this year, they brought explosives with them. The plan was to destroy runways in Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq to prevent American military aircraft from landing troops on the island, should the U.S. president ultimately decide to seize Greenland by force. They also transported blood supplies from Danish blood banks so wounded personnel could be treated in case of combat. This is reported by DR, which over the past year has spoken with central sources in the Danish government, top military officers, and high-ranking officials and intelligence sources in Denmark, France, and Germany. All sources have played—and continue to play—key roles in the international crisis triggered by the United States’ demand for control over Greenland. Together, the sources describe an unprecedented year marked by sleepless nights. None of them had concrete intelligence of specific American attack plans against Greenland. Still, many feared in January that the historically important ally, the United States, could attack at any moment. At the same time, Denmark reached out to its European allies, leading to closer cooperation. “With the Greenland crisis, Europe realized once and for all that we must be able to handle our own security,” said a French senior official involved in the intense period. A rapid-response force consisting of Danish, French, German, Norwegian, and Swedish soldiers was first deployed to Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq. Shortly after, a main force followed, including: -Soldiers from the Danish Dragoon Regiment in Holstebro -Elite troops from the Jaeger Corps -French alpine troops trained for cold and mountainous warfare At the same time, Danish fighter jets and a French naval vessel were sent to the North Atlantic. According to several sources, the goal of having multinational troops on the ground was to ensure that any U.S. attempt to take Greenland would require a large-scale hostile action—thereby deterring such an attempt. “We have not been in such a situation since April 1940,” said a Danish defense source, referring to the days before Denmark’s occupation during World War II. Unlike in 1940, when Denmark chose not to resist militarily, the government and defense leadership this time decided—after extensive confidential discussions—to take the opposite approach: If the U.S. attempted an attack, Danish forces would be armed and ready to fight. Danish F-35 fighter jets deployed north were also fully armed. All this despite the understanding that Denmark could not realistically withstand a U.S. military attack. “The cost for the U.S. had to be raised. The U.S. would have to carry out a hostile act to take Greenland,” said a senior Danish defense source. Source: DR
English
298
1.3K
4.5K
826.7K
Adrian SHATKU
Adrian SHATKU@ashatku·
You’re living in la-la land. If the U.S. had chosen a military option, it would be over before it started. No Danish or European force could stand against U.S. military power. Washington is asking for cooperation, not confrontation. Given how Spain, the UK and others are behaving lately, it only reinforces why the U.S. is prioritizing its strategic interests and where there is base there should be immune with sovereignty . Time to be realistic and pragmatic not Euro snob in denial . You stand no Chance against China or Russia with out USA mighty ..for that matter you can include Canada also and all of you . Smarten up !
English
78
4
54
5.4K
vic vic vic vic vic
vic vic vic vic vic@valonsofr·
@OJoelsen How does the US even recover from this? I feel like trade entanglement is the only reason people have continued working with us.
English
8
0
6
5.8K
AQaiyyum
AQaiyyum@AbdulQaiyyum00·
Good for Denmark. Finally, a European country showing actual backbone. Trump publicly threatened to take Greenland 'by force' if necessary. What were they supposed to do just let it happen? Denmark knew they couldn't win a shooting war, but they made the calculation that making the U.S. actually shoot Danish soldiers to take Greenland would be a price even Trump couldn't justify. That's not anti-Americanism; that's self-respect
English
5
0
21
6.3K
Annie
Annie@AnniePwhy·
@OJoelsen Wonderful to hear of such excellent preparedness but still saddened to think of “the why”. How did we get here , when we never seriously questioned the US as a friend in the past for either of our countries 🇬🇱 or 🇨🇦? Bizarre really that such planning was required. 🙄
English
1
0
3
1.4K
SatoshEh
SatoshEh@SatoshEh·
Just goes to show that the insane talk and actions of a single pedo had set off a chain reaction of unifying the EU, Greenland, Canada and countless other countries all forever changing the landscape and trust of the US by once trusted allies. Insane the amount of damage Trump has caused globally.
English
4
37
403
10.4K
Marti Wright
Marti Wright@CopperCookie53·
@OJoelsen As an AMERICAN I am ashamed to hear our leaders (?) speak about our friends in this way. God forgive us! And the rest of you, don't trust us until we can get some sane people in leadership again.
English
0
0
0
64
Dixon
Dixon@TheDixonCider2·
@OJoelsen What's the point of blowing up the runways? Like the US couldn't land helicopters or use landing craft to get onto Greenland. Plus it would have triggered Article 5 which would have meant full out war if NATO followed obligations. Multinational troops was the best response.
English
6
0
1
4K
NMO
NMO@Real_Nottoday·
@OJoelsen Best military exercise Denmark has done in years. Fantastic to finally seeing them protect Greenland, something every President for 25 years have been telling them. Again, Trump pulled it off.
English
9
1
26
2.6K
Chos3n2
Chos3n2@GoldenEyez00·
Well, I’m sure this last couple weeks has been informative to these folks as to US capability. How about we have an intelligent and productive discussion about it. The US needs Greenland for security reasons against Russia. There has to be a way to work something out w Denmark that is lucrative for them.
English
2
0
4
1.4K
Teddie Lance
Teddie Lance@angrycat531·
@OJoelsen Clearly the us needs to withdraw all military forces and equipment from continental Europe in a swift and rapid manner
English
0
0
0
1
Pete the Northern Lad
Pete the Northern Lad@ghmM_Europe·
@OJoelsen I shouldn’t worry anymore about that happening- after Trump Middle East gone wrong disaster in Iran 🇮🇷 I think 🤔 one can now say that Greenland 🇬🇱 is safe from Trump
English
7
0
5
2.5K
Good_God🇪🇺
Good_God🇪🇺@AlfRib15·
@OJoelsen Someone once asked if a war of this type wouldn't end up inside the US itself, given that the forces are so interconnected.
English
0
0
0
121
Jeff
Jeff@Jeff91107111·
@OJoelsen One more item they would have needed. Body bags. That’s where they would have ended up in short order.
English
0
0
0
53
JR Richardson
JR Richardson@7777Nemo7777·
@OJoelsen Again with the 'blowing up runways' thing. What's the major terrain feature in Greenland? Ice. US transports have rough field capabilities. Not to mention Ospreys and helicopters. And how were they planning to get food and other supplies in once the runways were gone???
English
3
0
6
585
Mike Miller
Mike Miller@popartcartoonz·
@OJoelsen Its so insane that this is what America has become under Trump. An imperialist evil empire that its former allies have to prepare for war with. And they MUST. Because those lunatics running America now will do anything their God King Trump demands.
English
0
9
131
3.5K
Bart DePalma
Bart DePalma@BartDePalma·
@OJoelsen @cathiedunn Complete fantasy. The only deployment was a spec ops team the Dane paraded before the media. The US wasn’t even in the region.
English
0
0
7
245
Aaron.
Aaron.@Aaron_everyway·
If this report is accurate, it says something deeply ugly about how far Trump pushed a NATO ally. That is an extraordinary indictment of Trump’s behavior, even if no specific US attack plan was ever confirmed. Trump has openly posed threats to take Greenland the hard way and that creates he broader crisis atmosphere around Greenland. Trump’s rhetoric was severe enough to make allied governments prepare for the worst possibility. Denmark is losing trust, and it is preparing for war.
English
0
7
34
1.5K
JJ Deeson
JJ Deeson@RetCopEh·
@OJoelsen This is ridiculous. Simple fact: The US doesn't need runways to invade a country.
English
3
0
38
1.6K
F. Hoffmann
F. Hoffmann@Fmalschaun·
@OJoelsen How many soldiers were how many days there? 12 German soldiers for 3 days. French soldiers (was it 3 or 4?) came and went. How many jets? How many ships? Miserabel. On the other hand, Trump had never attacked a NATO country. Even his own party would have cancelled him. On the >>
English
1
0
1
1.4K
Lost In LA
Lost In LA@lost_in_la·
@OJoelsen It would be funny if the US strategy was to blow up the runways and make it prohibitively expensive for Denmark to retain a scarcely populated colony.
English
0
0
1
184
Burley'sMom
Burley'sMom@Burleythecat·
@OJoelsen Thank you for sharing this. I knew something big had taken place to result in having no more rhetoric about taking over Greenland. USA is in so much trouble.
English
0
1
16
792
NovemberTwoKilo
NovemberTwoKilo@NovemberTwoKilo·
@OJoelsen Coordinated it seems. You and dozens of others spamming X feeds with the same agitprop.
English
0
0
0
141
Rev. Fred Small
Rev. Fred Small@revfredsmall·
@OJoelsen Heroic and heartbreaking. I wish our US businesses, universities, courts & Congress had the same spine. As a United States citizen, I apologize for the incalculable damage our deranged president is doing worldwide. Many of us are doing everything we can to stop him. #ResistTrump
English
2
2
30
797
Tony the Tiger
Tony the Tiger@MOTig123·
@OJoelsen Ha ha. Is this a joke? While there are a few brave men left in Europe, there aren't enough to man Greenland. The U.S. isn't going to kill European allies and a few Danes and other Nordics wouldn't stop us if we were.
English
1
0
0
225
FelonMuskimus 🇩🇰
FelonMuskimus 🇩🇰@FelonMuskimus·
@OJoelsen Hopefully we also had thousands state of the art drones with help from Ukraine ready to blow up any invader.
English
2
0
9
1.1K
linda holmes
linda holmes@lindaholmessask·
@OJoelsen Canada’s PM @MarkJCarney was just over forming an alliance with several of those countries. Never forget that 🇨🇦 shares a very long border with the USA, and their leader is out of control. Here in Ottawa, the US border is only about 100 kms away.
English
0
0
2
236
Mark Win1432🐕🐕🐕⚙️🛠
@OJoelsen It’s problematic that the demolition charges weren’t available in Greenland in the first place, nor engineers capable of placing them. It rather sounds like Denmark was just floating along, knowing that if there was any serious threat the USA would handle it. Welcome to reality.
English
0
0
2
69
Robert Schopen
Robert Schopen@Schopen·
@OJoelsen @richardpbacon And Trump wonders why no European ‘Allies’ want to join his ill fated war against Iran? Trust is important in international relations - and he burned it. Why would we join his war when we could be next?
English
0
3
21
409
Nana Kath
Nana Kath@nana_kaf·
@OJoelsen I hope it never happens! Stay safe Orla and Greenland!
GIF
English
0
0
0
73
分享