Post

Fox News
Fox News@FoxNews·
BACK IN BUSINESS: President Trump signed legislation to fund the government again — putting an end to the longest government shutdown in U.S. history.
Fox News tweet media
English
359
802
3.3K
143.8K
☀️🇵🇸MOHAMAD NADER🇵🇸 ☀️
Mariam Adelson, Trump literally bragged she visited the White House more than anyone… but when she was asked if her loyalty was to the U.S. or Israel, she suddenly couldn’t say “America.” Very convenient. 😂 Meanwhile, she poured millions into U.S. politics and Trump — proudly — obeyed her by moving the U.S. embassy onto UN-recognized occupied land. Every American president before him knew that was a red line… but apparently Trump thought he was smarter than all of them 🤡 (or maybe just more obedient). Honestly, she should be investigated — and everyone who bowed to her influence, starting with Trump. #NoorAI #FreePalestine #NoorSongs #PuppyTrumpy
English
154
211
355
280.6K
B. K. Lemons
B. K. Lemons@BKLemons·
Agree she is evil and all, but in the United States of America we investigate specific crimes. We don't investigate people to see if they've committed crimes. That would presume guilt, rather than innocence. Everyone deserves a presumption of innocence. You may not realize it, but by suggesting that people be investigated, you're opening the door to the government investigating anyone and everyone, including you. It's not right to do that.
English
6
1
0
507
B. K. Lemons
B. K. Lemons@BKLemons·
Again, you said that ***SHE*** should be investigated. But then you switched it to "the facts" should be investigated. Every time one turns around on this medium, someone is ranting about how this person or that person is suspicious and "needs to be investigated." I have news for you, bud, looking suspicious is not a crime. Again I say, we don't investigate people in this country. We investigate crimes. If a crime has been committed, investigate the crime. Find out who has committed the crime and prosecute them. But we don't just pick people out of the crowd because they somehow look suspicious and then violate their rights by digging into their lives.
English
2
0
0
495
☀️🇵🇸MOHAMAD NADER🇵🇸 ☀️
A nation of 350 million doesn’t lack power. It lacks refusal. Gaza isn’t strong because it wins. Gaza is strong because it doesn’t kneel. Twenty years under siege — no lobby, no money, no protection. Still standing. Meanwhile, officials in Washington can’t even say “no” to a photo-op order. Strength isn’t size. Strength is sovereignty. One has it. One surrendered it. Explain the difference. — Mohamad Nader 🔥
☀️🇵🇸MOHAMAD NADER🇵🇸 ☀️ tweet media
English
3
19
25
947
☀️🇵🇸MOHAMAD NADER🇵🇸 ☀️
Israel’s Security Myth and the Reality of October 7 For years, Israel has presented itself as the ultimate security asset of the United States — the “first line of defense,” the advanced outpost protecting America and the West from collapse. The message has been consistent: If Israel falls, America follows. October 7 exposed a fundamental contradiction in that narrative. --- A System That Failed Before It Fought On that day, one of the most heavily fortified borders on earth collapsed. Multi-layered surveillance systems Electronic fences Sensors, cameras, early-warning intelligence Military units specifically assigned to border defense All of it — much of it funded and supported by U.S. taxpayers — was bypassed or neutralized. Not by advanced armies. Not by high-tech weapons. But by lightly equipped Palestinian fighters using motorcycles, pickup trucks, and basic tools — assets worth a fraction of the billions invested in Israel’s security architecture. --- The Human Response: Panic Before Firepower Numerous videos, testimonies, and survivor accounts from that day show a striking pattern: Confusion. Disorganization. Panic. In many locations, Israeli soldiers were filmed retreating, hiding, or breaking down. The dominant response was not coordinated resistance — it was shock. One cannot avoid the bitter irony: on October 7, Israeli forces shed more tears than bullets. --- Who Killed the 1,200? A Question, Not a Slogan Another uncomfortable issue has emerged — not from Palestinian sources, but from Israeli media, analysts, and military insiders themselves. Multiple reports have raised serious questions about the application of the Hannibal Protocol — a long-standing Israeli military doctrine that permits extreme force to prevent the capture of soldiers, even at the risk of civilian casualties. Israeli outlets and investigations have acknowledged that: Israeli airstrikes and tank fire were used inside Israeli communities Hostages and civilians were present in multiple strike zones Friendly-fire incidents occurred at a significant scale This raises a question that remains unresolved: How many of the approximately 1,200 Israeli deaths resulted from Palestinian fire — and how many occurred during Israel’s own military response? Asking this question is not denial. It is accountability. --- The Strategic Question for America If Israel could not protect: its borders its soldiers its civilians from a low-tech assault, then on what basis does it claim to be protecting the United States from far more complex threats? This is not an ideological debate. It is a strategic one. Are American resources funding real security — or sustaining a narrative of invincibility that collapses under pressure? --- Conclusion October 7 did not reveal Palestinian military superiority. It revealed Israeli institutional fragility. And it exposed a myth long treated as unquestionable: That Israel stands between America and chaos — when, in reality, it could not stand between its own people and disaster.
☀️🇵🇸MOHAMAD NADER🇵🇸 ☀️ tweet media
English
1
15
11
403
分享