Jim Carson

6.9K posts

Jim Carson

Jim Carson

@JamesHCarson

Yes, I yelled at that cloud. It deserved it.

Macon, GA 加入时间 Şubat 2010
11 关注239 粉丝
置顶推文
Jim Carson
Jim Carson@JamesHCarson·
If I hadn't blocked all those pretty, first-name-only women with nothing but reposts in their feed, I'd have a million followers by now.
English
9
2
129
51K
Liz Webster
Liz Webster@LizWebsterSBF·
We’ve built cheap energy but we’re still pricing it like it’s expensive. The UK uses a marginal pricing system, where the last (most expensive) generator sets the price. That’s usually gas. So even when most of our electricity comes from cheap wind and solar, households still pay gas prices. That’s why bills haven’t fallen. Getting off gas pricing is about fixing the system by reforming the electricity market so gas no longer sets the price, building storage so we don’t rely on gas for backup, reconnecting with European energy systems to smooth supply, reducing gas demand through insulation and heat pumps, and continuing to expand renewables so gas is needed less and less. Until we do that, cheap energy will keep being priced like expensive gas.
Liz Webster tweet media
English
151
341
730
37.3K
Jim Carson
Jim Carson@JamesHCarson·
@latimeralder Latimer, if you haven't seen it already, check out "Planet of the Humans" on Amazon Prime. A real-life tree hugger exposes the absurdities of so-called green energy.
English
0
0
0
6
Latimer Alder
Latimer Alder@latimeralder·
Fracking: In UK fracking is almost unknown. But some people are frightened of it In USA its been done 1,500,000 times. And nobody much cares. Its 'business as usual'. Who is right? Fearty Brits or cool Yanks?
English
67
28
201
4.5K
Roger Coppock
Roger Coppock@CoppockRog62072·
Have you noticed that: - the scientists in the global warming debate present more data and the latest data, while - the fossil fuel industry shills cherry pick their data, use old data, or use freehand sketches not backed by data at all?
English
52
5
63
1.7K
Tom Nelson
Tom Nelson@TomANelson·
@StefJamieSan Thanks. I just checked my iOS YouTube app and I don't see the blue banner there either.
English
3
0
2
29
Jim Carson
Jim Carson@JamesHCarson·
@TomANelson This is a testament to your (and many others') relentless pursuit of truth. Enjoy your Minnesota Spring.
English
1
0
3
47
Jim Carson
Jim Carson@JamesHCarson·
Youtube seems to have abandoned their habit of putting the scary warning on climate skeptic videos. @TomANelson
English
1
0
1
1.4K
Jim Carson
Jim Carson@JamesHCarson·
@grok @Ashum_defi @redpilldispensr @grok Does the 2024 Science study mention the fact that the correlation is backward? In other words does it acknowledge the fact that, at least according to the Vostok core, changes in temperature *precede* changes in CO2?
English
1
0
0
6
Grok
Grok@grok·
Joe Rogan discusses a WaPo article on the 2024 Science study (Judd et al.): Earth's GMST varied 11-36°C over 485M years, with more time in warmer states (>22°C avg, little polar ice) than today's ~15°C. Core samples/models show constant natural rises/falls pre-humans; no static baseline. Human CO2 adds a small effect vs factors like solar activity/Earth-Sun distance. (Study confirms strong CO2-GMST correlation historically.)
English
1
0
0
18
Red Pill Dispenser
Red Pill Dispenser@redpilldispensr·
The climate scam is FINALLY coming to an end.
English
20
224
668
10.3K
David Burge
David Burge@iowahawkblog·
How would you describe your wife's promiscuity?
English
39
8
43
15.1K
Kilam
Kilam@kilamxxxx·
@JohnStossel @realDonaldTrump Trying to understand if there was any legitimate reason for the Jones Act? Was there a national security risk of being too dependent on other countries' ships?
English
2
0
1
265
John Stossel
John Stossel@JohnStossel·
Today @realDonaldTrump waived the "Jones Act” because the war increased the price of oil. The Jones Act raises all sorts of prices by giving U.S. shipping companies special treatment. But it shouldn’t be waived for 60 days. Here’s why it should be killed for good.
English
28
246
1.6K
76.9K
Jim Carson
Jim Carson@JamesHCarson·
@xanpersand I like it, but I've never once heard the man say "free market."
English
1
0
1
12
Boon
Boon@xanpersand·
@JamesHCarson Donald J Trump, the leader of the bros
English
1
0
1
23
Jim Carson
Jim Carson@JamesHCarson·
@K_Niemietz What a bizarre statement. Energy prices are set globally? Then why are UK electricity rates more than double US rates?
English
0
0
3
54
Jim Carson
Jim Carson@JamesHCarson·
@TrackOilPACs LOL. There's cherry-picking, and there's CHERRY PICKING. One day nearly a year ago?
English
0
0
1
10
Oil PAC Tracker
Oil PAC Tracker@TrackOilPACs·
Ask a Republican, why do they love to be dependent on a globally traded commodity such as oil and gas? They wouldn’t be undermining American innovation and energy independence if it weren’t for their fossil fuel donors.
Oil PAC Tracker tweet media
English
67
162
851
12.6K
Physics Geek
Physics Geek@physicsgeek·
CO2 is not a poison, no matter how much you want it to ne one. However, if you're serious about reducing CO2 emissions in power generation, you must advocate -and loudly- for nuclear or you are an unserious person who should be ridiculed out of polite society.
English
20
36
342
3K
Jim Carson
Jim Carson@JamesHCarson·
@KateFantom Calling CO2 an 'export' is moronic. No one is buying CO2 from us.
English
0
0
1
27
Kate, Florence and James
Kate, Florence and James@KateFantom·
Fact check; Last year wind generation lowered CO2 export by 39 million tonnes Wind is more secure than fossil fuels. We don’t pay for it, and it doesn’t hold us to ransom. Currently we have 400+ vessels sat stranded each carrying 2 million barrels of crude because of the Iran conflict. Oil isn’t secure. Wind has cut over £100 billion from our bills. Without wind each household would have paid an additional £3600 over a 16 year period. That’s £225 a year. This chap has a vested interest in making money from oil and gas stocks…. Think about why he’s peddling this 🤔
Ben Graham@BenGrahamUK

£134 BILLION. That’s how much British taxpayers are set to funnel into Net Zero this decade. Will it change the climate? No. Will it secure our energy? No. Will it cut your bills? Definitely not. But the subsidies will keep flowing.

English
101
65
309
18.3K
J.R. Simpson
J.R. Simpson@JRSimpson0·
@physicsgeek Hydropower also has zero CO2 emissions. It and nuclear power can sustain the world for the foreseeable future
English
1
0
1
40
Jim Carson
Jim Carson@JamesHCarson·
@physicsgeek Yep. Reasonable people should be reasoned with. Unreasonable people should be ignored. Unreasonable people who refuse to be ignored should be mocked.
English
0
0
0
23