H

@Alissonbecker @_pauljoyce Get better Ali!!! You are the best in the world and a legend!!!

Não tive nova lesão. Estou em fase de tratamento, e o plano é estar em plenas condições de jogo até o final de abril!

@libsoftiktok I certainly do. There is no comparison on accuracy and reliability. I wish people understood that getting news from twitter makes you less informed, not more informed. Notice how people love legacy media when they like the story, but hate it when they don’t.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese criticizes people getting news from social media because it's "misinformation," and not "consistent" like legacy news outlets. Who here trusts the "consistent" legacy media?

@YaKnow1634 @Milajoy Do you view a RINO as someone who isn’t actually conservative or someone who is conservative but doesn’t do what they are told by the party?

Democrats are ultra SNEAKY. They pretend Democrats are Republicans to get elected. There are 15 GOP Senators with a “F” Liberty Score. They are actual DEMOCRATS. They are: Collins Murkowski Graham Capito McConnell Tillis Wicker Moran Thune Young Rounds Cornyn Hyde-Smith Cassidy Grassley

@ericmetaxas Anybody mentioning Sidney Powell for AG is not a serious person. But it does show how the shallow the maga talent pool is. No competent Americans want to work with this admin

Or Sidney Powell or Stephen Miller. GAME ON.

@DataRepublican @shelby_gra46231 This is such a joke. Imagine wasting all this time while ignoring Clarence Thomas. MAGA hates this country so much.

🧵THREAD: Is Trump's hunch about foreign influence in SCOTUS correct? After the Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling on tariffs, Trump said "It's my opinion that the court has been swayed by foreign interests and a political movement that is far smaller than people would ever think." Trump is likely referring to the ideology of supranationalism -- a centuries-old ideology that considered tariffs to be among the highest economical blunders, not for economic reasons, but because tariffs dare to assert national rights in a telos of universal liberalism. But is he right about the foreign influence? As has been widely reported, @MikeBenzCyber has unpacked the details of the friendship between John Roberts and Norm Eisen, and their Prague vacations where they discussed "American and European rule-of-law issues" together. But there's more to it. A lot more. 👇 As always, patience as I pull the thread together.

@IanSpeir Grow up, man. You are crying about certifying that you won’t do a thing that you state you would not do anyways. This eternal victimhood just makes you look like a loser.

Colorado is now requiring lawyers in the State, as a condition of logging into its court e-filing system, to promise not to cooperate with federal authorities in enforcing federal immigration law. Please understand: - I do not practice immigration law. - I do not practice criminal law. - Nothing about my civil practice has anything to do with this. And yet because I cannot log into the State's official e-filing system without saluting The Resistance, I now cannot represent my clients, file lawsuits, access cases, file documents in existing cases, etc. If I click "Decline," it kicks me out of the system. I must click "Accept" to access the system and continue representing my civil clients -- again, in cases that have absolutely nothing to do with immigration law or policy. I've read SB 25-276 (the law referred to below). It does not regulate me as a private attorney or any of the clients I represent in civil matters. This is outrageous draconian overreach. I have ethical obligations to my clients to represent them competently. My existing cases have running deadlines that I must attend to. Judges issue orders in my cases that I must follow. If I don't click "Accept" in order to access the State's e-filing system, I will harm my clients, torpedo my practice, and probably commit malpractice. So, I have no choice. I'm clicking "Accept" under protest.

@imavip @katierogers @tylerpager What are you claiming the story got wrong?

@katierogers @tylerpager A scoop denied by the White House and some of the savviest people on this app. Well done, NY Times.

Scoop machine @tylerpager closing the loop - Trump Fires Pam Bondi as Attorney General nytimes.com/2026/04/02/us/…

@HumanistUzbek @FW19520 @anneapplebaum Um, you just listed the globalist agenda you support. Trump’s only accomplishments are him pushing globalism. Do you realize you are a globalist?

@FW19520 @anneapplebaum These globalists are so blind!

Trump has insulted and tariffed his European allies, persuaded Denmark to prepare for a US invasion and, by pressuring Ukraine and not Russia, encouraged Putin to keep fighting. All of which he has forgotten. theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/03/…

@FW19520 @anneapplebaum Trump was just threatening to invade a NATO ally. Do you think the US needs to join in any war that a globalist ally starts? Have you argued that we should help Ukraine?

@anneapplebaum The EU,with its globalist agenda, abandoned the US. Stopping Iran from owning nuclear bombs is such an obvious global interest, & yet the EU made up ideological excuses to stay out of the fight to the extent of forgoing the protection of its own interests. It's laughable but sad.

@HoHBracketology Interesting. Bigunda is a stud, but hard to spend that much with his offensive production.

will be the number one player in the portal and might be even after everyone has entered. will command huge money for very good reason. also fascinated to see if any teams get ahead this year by pivoting against the tidal wave of coaches trying to recreate Duke/arizona/michigan

@DividedStatesO4 @mitchellvii Iran is going to be so much richer from this. The “bags of cash” Obama returned to them will be like a weeks worth of what they’ll make controlling the strait

@LetsGoBack___ @mitchellvii Nit a war crime… it’s their cash cow 🤷‍♂️

𝗗𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗢𝗬 𝗞𝗛𝗔𝗥𝗚 𝗜𝗦𝗟𝗔𝗡𝗗! - Iran needs to hear a very clear and direct message from the United States right now. If you do not immediately reopen the Strait of Hormuz and guarantee safe passage for every ship, WE WILL COMPLETELY LEVEL KHARG ISLAND. That is not a threat. That is a promise. Kharg Island is the BACKBONE OF THEIR ENTIRE OIL ECONOMY. It handles nearly ninety percent of all Iranian crude exports. Take that out and their cash flow from oil stops almost overnight. The regime loses its main lifeline and the money they use to fund terror around the world dries up fast. Yes, oil prices might spike temporarily if we are forced to strike. But the second the Strait of Hormuz opens again and the tankers start flowing freely, that pressure comes right off and prices will come crashing back down. The disruption would be short. The lesson would last forever. This is our ace in the hole. This is the big card we hold that changes everything. We should play it without hesitation. The Iranian regime understands only one thing: real strength. Weakness invites more aggression. Decisive action brings peace. Under strong leadership we do not play games. We end problems. And this problem can be ended very quickly if they know we are serious. The Strait will open. American interests will be protected. Peace through strength works when you actually use the strength.

@PDiczok @CBSNews This argument would mean politicians are above the law. If the other branches can’t effect each other, they hen you just created two classes of Americans.

@CBSNews Of course it is, Doofus. Congress cannot impinge on how a President operates, including what he does with his documents, just like the President can't impinge on SCoTUS's document making and retention. There are 3 separate and equal branches.

The Justice Department said that a federal law enacted in the wake of the Watergate scandal that requires the president to preserve certain documents and turn them over to the National Archives at the end of his administration is unconstitutional. cbsn.ws/4tiEszE

@OVERTHELINE_SD @ClayTravis You could not name a single thing he’s done to help Americans. Isn’t that wild?

@LetsGoBack___ @ClayTravis Lmao. I give 2 fucks about the files. The border is secured. Were Deporting illegals. Iran is blown to kingdom come. Nato is paying their fair share... I could go on The only one fooled are the fools that caused this

President Trump has fired AG Pam Bondi.

@RomanEchoes @USCivicsGuide @libsoftiktok He literally states his argument at the end. Did you not finish it? I have bad news for you about how things ended for the Romans

@LetsGoBack___ @USCivicsGuide @libsoftiktok What argument? All I saw was a history lesson.

Ketanji Brown Jackson's argument justifying birthright citizenship: "If I steal someone's wallet in Japan, the Japanese authorities can arrest me and prosecute me... I'm still locally owing allegiance in that sense." Umm... WHAT?!

@JarlBlitzen @GuntherEagleman But that is not an argument related to the meaning of the 14th. I have no problem with people wanting to end birthright citizenship. I see positives to that. But that’s just not what it ever meant and conservatives used to care about what the constitution actually means

@LetsGoBack___ @GuntherEagleman Quit being obtuse. If a thief broke into your house, should their kids keep the profit of your lawbreaking? I have no hate for illegal immigrants, but i do have issues with lawbreakers profiting from their lawlessness, hopefully you will grow out of your ignorance.

BOMBSHELL: Sauer to Sotomayor: We are NOT asking to overrule Wong Kim Ark. Those parents were lawfully domiciled. Later cases casually calling children of illegal aliens citizens were drive-by rulings with no real analysis. The executive order is prospective only. No retroactive stripping of citizenship.

@protakill @T12zyu @USCivicsGuide @libsoftiktok How exactly do you plan to test the allegiance of a newborn? Surely you agree the citizenship clause does not mention parents. They made the argument up. It doesn’t work

@T12zyu @LetsGoBack___ @USCivicsGuide @libsoftiktok Wrong, it means your allegiance.

@Selene_Mariposa You said you watched it

You called me a liar because “there are no cameras allowed.” You’re right. There are no cameras inside the Supreme Court. I wasn’t in attendance. I listened to the live audio broadcast — the same audio the Supreme Court released to every major network and C-SPAN in real time. Millions of Americans did the same thing. Then, when the 139-page transcript was published on the Supreme Court’s own website that afternoon, I read every single page of it. All 44,000 words. Every justice. Every question. Every answer. I couldn’t see the eye rolls every time Jackson opened her mouth. But I didn’t need to. The transcript did all the work. You didn’t read the transcript. You didn’t listen to the audio. You just assumed I was lying because the facts made your side look bad. That’s not bad faith. That’s called doing the reading. You should try it sometime. 🦋

I am watching the Supreme Court oral arguments and I need to talk about Ketanji Brown Jackson. I have sat through corporate negotiations where the other side didn’t know their own numbers. I have watched people bluff at poker tables with their cards showing. I have read legal briefs written by first-year associates at 3 AM that had more coherent reasoning than what I just heard. This woman should never negotiate a contract. She should never play poker. She should never practice law. And she should absolutely never appear on Jeopardy because Alex Trebek would have come back from the grave just to ask her to stop. Her questioning today wasn’t questioning. It was confusion with a microphone. She wasn’t probing the legal arguments. She was lost in them. The attorneys were answering her questions and she didn’t understand her own follow-ups. This is a Supreme Court Justice. This is a lifetime appointment. This is a woman sitting on the highest court in the land deciding who is and isn’t an American citizen. She shouldn’t be judging science fair projects. I don’t care who appointed her. I don’t care what she looks like. I care that the person interpreting the Constitution of the United States can follow a legal argument from beginning to end without getting lost in her own hypotheticals. The other justices — agree with them or not — asked sharp questions. They tested the boundaries of the arguments. They pushed both sides. That’s what oral arguments are for. She pushed nothing. She wandered. And the country is supposed to trust her with the most consequential constitutional question of the century. God help us. 🥃🦋

@AVeryBlueDemon @DanLamothe That news was announced by the WH Press Secretary. They trained you to reflexively reject any information that isn’t “Trump = God”

@LetsGoBack___ @DanLamothe What now? 😆 🤡

SCOOP: The Pentagon is preparing for weeks of ground operations in Iran, U.S. officials said, as thousands of American soldiers and Marines arrive in the Middle East for what could become a dangerous new phase of the war should President Donald Trump choose to escalate.

@LorrieAnn25 @RepJasmine So you actually are against the constitution. We have a separation of powers and not a dictator. MAGA voters need to grow up and learn that winning an election doesn’t end our nations laws and culture.

@LetsGoBack___ @RepJasmine Yeah, but that's not the point That's what they're doing now. And no I don't want judges in charge. I voted for the president to enact his policies. I don't believe judges should crown themselves kings.

D.C.’s biggest bully just pulled up to the Supreme Court to try to intimidate the justices into ending birthright citizenship. No sitting president has ever attended oral arguments — but this one thinks the Constitution is optional and that the Court must bow down to him.

@USCivicsGuide @libsoftiktok They are no different than any other opinion by any person. They have zero controlling effect. They are useful when the logic used makes sense. But never to support what an actual law means.

Dissenting Opinions have changed SCOTUS rulings in future cases. Notable dissents are Dred Scott v. Sandford, Plessy v. Ferguson, 1. Justice John Marshall Harlan’s lone dissenting opinion in Plessy v. Ferguson Protesting the majority’s separate-but-equal doctrine, Harlan insisted that “[o]ur Constitution is color-blind and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens.” Harlan’s view was embraced 58 years later in Brown v. Board of Education, when the court condemned racial segregation as a violation of constitutional equal protection. 2. Dred Scot was quoted.