ILuvRedWine

@wangcailian @bbcchinese 妳家的長輩一定是巨臭，居然生出妳这种臭人。他们也不好意思说🥴

@bbcchinese 中国男人臭得离谱，恶心🤢我都不好意思说，可能我从小生活在中国性格，有些腼腆，中国女性都是比较干净

近日，一段马来西亚游客在中国对路人捂住鼻子并大喊“好臭”“你们都不洗澡吗”的影片在社交媒体疯传。 在该片引发中国和马来西亚网民的批评后，马来西亚警察总长周二（6月23日）宣布，已对涉事警员展开纪律调查。

@huanlang554980 @RepDonBacon 这里是X.

@MeetMeTomorrow8 @RepDonBacon 你试试微信里发三个字，习近平。要不发四个数字：8964

The terrible human cost of Communism: Stalin’s policies led to death of 20 million in his country. Mao killed approximately 70 million Chinese.

@Anthony1Suworow @SenTomCotton Expensiveness is good for you. 🥴

@SenTomCotton they only threaten profit margins. He wants you to die rather than use better cheaper more advanced technology

Communist Chinese-made medical devices threaten the privacy and safety of every American patient. My bill would crack-down on these dangerous devices. breitbart.com/politics/2026/…

@SenTomCotton His bill eliminates competition in real, limiting supplies from few suppliers, jet up the cost, which continues the momentum to make Americans’ healthcare being unaffordable. You have a toxic political system which protects interests of corporations and oligarchs.

NEW: A global law body has given the thumbs up to Hong Kong’s legal system, a top commentator said last night at the United Nations. The Chinese city’s rule of law was praised by Claudio Visco, President of the International Bar Association, said Dr Henry Ho, a legal and political specialist from Hong Kong. Ho was speaking yesterday at a United Nations meeting in Geneva, Switzerland. This is significant, since that global legal group’s human rights division had made a bizarre, deeply politicized attack on Hong Kong’s legal sector two years ago. . UNDESERVED CRITICISM The division’s underserved criticism followed illegal sanctions on Hong Kong people from the United States—a country which lags behind Hong Kong in international rankings of the rule of law. It’s significant that the International Bar Association is now standing with Hong Kong. Listen to what Henry Ho said last night. . IBA WILL SPEAK OUT “I am Dr Henry Ho and I was born and grown up in Hong Kong. ‘Hong Kong has a strong tradition of the rule of law….and the city managed the complicated period of transition following enactment of the two pieces of national security legislation, in a constructive way.’ “Ladies and gentlemen, these are not my words, but those of Mr Claudio Visco, President of the International Bar Association, who attended the Opening of the Legal Year of Hong Kong this January. "I was there and he pledged that the IBA will speak out against any unjustified sanctions to Hong Kong’s judges and lawyers. . SAY NO TO ILLEGAL U.S. SANCTIONS “What a stark contrast it is! Two years ago, the IBA’s Human Rights Institute launched harsh and unjustified attacks to our National Security Laws. I am pleased to see that our international peers are gaining a renewed, evidence-based assessment to our rule of law. “National Security Laws protect the rights of all people, including the prosecuted. Take the case of Jimmy Lai, his open trial took more than 150 days and over 80000 pages of evidence were presented. The final judgement contains more than 800 pages and you can download it from the internet. “We urge the international community to support Hong Kong judges and say No to the bullying and illegal sanctions of the United States. Our judges will continue to administer justice, without fear or favour.” . PROTECTING HONG KONG PEOPLE There’s an interesting background to this issue. In 1990, the Hong Kong people were promised that they would have the same national security protection from illegal foreign collusion that virtually all other places had. But Hong Kong was a major CIA station, so in 1994, under the leadership of a man named Dick Thornburgh, the US launched an extremely well-funded campaign in Hong Kong to prevent the city ever getting a national security law. That campaign succeeded—until 2020. Foreign collusion became illegal, just as it is in the US, the UK and elsewhere—and certain people suddenly found the need to leave Hong Kong in a hurry! They won’t be missed. .

@aWqCFYteBs0Pb5B @RepDonBacon 对着你们这种人，不嫌烦🤣

@MeetMeTomorrow8 @RepDonBacon 翻来覆去再讲同一句话，天天讲你们不嫌烦

@love19021877 @RepDonBacon 十多亿人既得利益。气死你🥴

@MeetMeTomorrow8 @RepDonBacon 傻逼东西 你是中共的既得利益者你当然维护你个傻逼东西

@FatemehSad24430 @RepDonBacon I Fxck you too

@MeetMeTomorrow8 @RepDonBacon Fuck you, your people don't have any access to Internet, you work for CCP propaganda

HOW THE U.N. FOOLED THE WORLD ABOUT CHINA Westerners took over control of a United Nations body to claim the Chinese locked up a million or millions of people—but they had no evidence. The “MILLIONS” number was extrapolated from interviews with just 40 people, and they were not randomly selected, said Australian lawyer and researcher Jaq James from Geolaw Narratives. These clearly untrustworthy findings were then amplified by mainstream media reports quoting people from US groups paid to demonize China—with their membership and funding hidden from readers, our own research shows. The result is a massive scam on the world’s public. Four points: . 1. THEY HIDE THE NEED FOR DERADICALIZATION Point one: In mainstream reports about terrorist deradicalization efforts after the 9/11 attack, the 9/11 act of terrorism is mentioned. Same with the deradicalization efforts after the 7/7 terrorism act in London. But there were more than 130 brutal, acts of terror in China—that’s correct, more than 130 murderous acts in which large numbers of innocent people were killed by Uyghur separatists. But these are simply not mentioned in typical reports. Only the response is mentioned. By deliberately removing the huge number of acts of terror to which the Chinese are responding, western journalists make the Chinese look like they are taking arbitrary actions against the Uyghurs. Yet the truth is that they were doing what westerners also did, responding to terrorist acts. [Image shows clip of “French re-education camps” headline] You can see how unfair that is. . 2. ORIGIN OF ‘MILLION LOCKED UP’ CLAIMS Point two: The first claim that China had arbitrarily locked up a million people was exposed by independent journalists at The Grayzone, as coming from an extrapolation from just eight people. More damning still, that extrapolation came from CHRD, a notorious US-based demonization-of-China outfit funded by the US government. The second claim that million people had been locked up came from the UNOHCR, the UN's human rights office. They took interviews from just 40 people and extrapolated what they heard to claim one million people had been unfairly locked up, as Jaq James’ research shows. Ms James points out that the UN should have interviewed randomly selected individuals to get a fair picture. But by interviewing politically networked ones, they are guaranteed to get a biased image. Again, fundamentally unfair. . 3. JUSTICE AND FAIRNESS Point three: This UN department had a leader, Michelle Bachelet, known for her appetite for justice and fairness. This meant she struggled with her staff—westerners who really controlled the operation. She insisted that their report be released alongside a response from China. Here we can see two reports – one from the UN group’s staff, and the response from China. The staff report was just 48 pages long. China’s reply was 120 pages long. How many western mainstream media outlets quoted the Chinese report, or even acknowledged its existence? Zero. Not one. Not. A. Single. One. . 4. IN WHICH WE DESTROY THE FINANCIAL TIMES Point four: The mainstream media write-ups about this subject hid the truth from readers in a shockingly deceitful way. Let’s take a look at a Financial Times article, which is fairly typical. It reinforces the UN group’s dubious findings with evidence which comes from “human rights experts and activists” – in other words, people paid by the US government to demonize China. The writers do NOT provide their names, just calling them “experts”. As Kyle Feranna said in his 2024 book: “Western NGOs, ostensibly concerned with human rights, disproportion¬ately focused on alleged violations in China despite much worse abuses occurring elsewhere in the world.” In other words, they weaponize human rights as tool to use against the Chinese. . GUANTANAMO BAY Then we get a quote from “Rushan Abbas of the Campaign for Uyghurs”. The Financial Times hides from its readers the fact that Ms Abbas was at the notorious Guantanamo Bay – not as a Muslim victim, but on the US side there. And the paper hides the fact that the Campaign for Uyghurs is financed by the NED, the CIA’s regime change spin off. These are absolutely key facts which change the whole tenor of the piece – and the FT is cheerfully deceiving its paying readers by omitting them. Abbas is quoted as saying, of the UN group’s western office staff, “without them, it would not have been released”. This reinforces many reports which say that Commissioner Michelle Bachelet did not want to release such an unfair report, but her staff, mostly westerners, pushed the unfair report out on her last day. . ANONYMOUS SOURCES Then the FT feature article quotes yet another person described as “an activist” and declines to provide his or her name. Then we go to yet another unnamed “human rights” officer. And then yes, a further unnamed “human rights” officer. And then we get a quote from an unnamed “person with knowledge”. And here we have another anonymous quote – a senior European diplomat. No name. I mean, there are so many unnamed sources in this piece, it would have been rejected at any decent journalism school. . OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY Now the FT piece breezily passes over a reference to the other side of the story by quote “China and 68 other countries”. This is hilarious. So if you are a demonizer, paid by the US State Department, you can get as many column inches in the FT as you like, with your name and funding hidden. But if you are 69 actual named countries defending China, giving the other side of the story—well, they’ll just mention it in passing. . THE REAL STORY Now, right at the bottom of the article we actually have a named person – and he actually tells the real story. “Bachelet was never really in full control of her office,” said Marc Limon. Now any journalist worth their salt would realize that that is the key quote in the whole article – and they would ask – okay, if she was not in charge of that UN group, WHO WAS? But the FT writers choose not to ask that awkward question. They don’t want to know. And they definitely don’t want their readers to know. . CLOSING LINE The FT writers close the article with a line from a quote “Uyghur journalist” who actually is named. She is Nuriman Abdureshid. So the reader is left thinking – oh, so they actually did manage to discuss this with someone in Xinjiang, someone with a name and a job. But what the FT "journalists" omit to tell the paper's long-suffering readers is that Ms Nuriman Abdureshid is associated with a group called Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, a Washington DC group which demonizes China to such an extreme extent that even other anti-China groups avoid them out of sheer embarrassment. Do I have proof that Victims of Communism is backed by the government? Well, the AI which has taken over Google tells us that Victims of Communism has received funding from the US State Department to deal with human rights issues. Here’s what happens when we look up their funding to check the details. [CLICKS LINK] “SORRY YOU HAVE BEEN BLOCKED’. Ah yes, the famous US “free speech”. . A QUESTION I’m going to close with a question. Why is the political and media class in the west working so hard to fool the world about the Chinese? Why work so hard to demonize a country that is working hard to lift itself out of starvation level poverty? What don’t they want the world to know? Could it be that China is actually doing something right? Think about that – and we may all, one day, be on the road to peace. .

@RepDonBacon You have a fake democracy, led by politicians who place Americans interests after Israel, oligarchs, and elites.

@DrewPavlou @kishor_nr You are fringe. 🥴

Sydney Morning Herald calls me “fringe” How am I fringe @kishor_nr? Is it fringe when the President of the United States of America calls the Australian Prime Minister at 2 AM over my posts? Is it fringe when the world’s richest man and greatest living inventor worth $1 trillion regularly shares my stuff? If only I could be mainstream like you, with your 6000 Twitter followers and column at dying newspaper nobody reads

@sifan198964 每个社会都有恶人，坏人，只是有多少这种人。美国如是，英国一样，中国同样有这些人，只是少数。 如果少数败类的存在，便硬生生扯为礼崩乐坏，那么你家就真是礼崩乐坼，有你这种天生爱胡扯混蛋。

礼崩乐坏，底层最恶！ 6月21日，浙江某街镇，一过路男子因为天降大雨，选择在一户人家屋檐下，坐长凳上避雨，待雨转小之后，起身走人，没有丝毫感恩，居然把人家晒的梅干菜，踢到雨中，这他妈是人吗？

USAID funding was central to the creation of COVID-19

This 5 year old pianist made everyone cry..🥹 youtube.com/shorts/qfgQGhh… 来自 @YouTube

@JamieMetzl It is a disgrace for democrats of your kind, claiming antisemitism if one does not support Israel’s apartheid and genocide to Palestinians. Shame on you. Hypocrisy to stunning level indeed.

I am a lifelong Democrat. I served in the White House for President Clinton, in the State Department for Madeleine Albright, and with the United Nations in Cambodia. I believe the most important role of any government is to protect the most vulnerable people in society and create an environment where everyone can realize their fullest potential. So it gives me no pleasure to have come to the following conclusion: The American left, including the left wing of the Democratic Party, is currently embracing an orgy of virulent antisemitism.

@business Bravos 👏🏻

China is choking shipments of some critical minerals to Japan, a slowdown that’s hurting companies and prompting calls for Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi to find a diplomatic off-ramp with Beijing bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

@wangjupaian 真不知恥。明知中方态度不见，立刻先下手为强🥴

【彭博：高市早苗拒绝在深圳APEC期间与习近平会面】 据彭博社6月23日报道，日本首相高市早苗不愿在深圳举行的APEC峰会期间与中国国家主席习近平举行会谈。 报道称，高市早苗对中方此前针对她个人的批评和攻击感到不满，因此无意推动双方领导人会面。 疑问：高市为啥不直接拒绝出席？毕竟是在深圳举办。而且，就现在的中日紧绷关系，估计习也不会主动跟她会晤的。

@Li_Qianmo @RSgoSb5dlOBw7xi 对。

这个做老婆，睡觉也得睁一只眼睛😂

Jaq James is back with a really info-packed short video about the UN report that people use against Xinjiang. It turns out to be quite shit on further inspection. Shock horror! WATCH: youtube.com/watch?v=hCEQyc…