置顶推文
My own diary of my first 5 months on UC by Stuart universalcreditsuffer.com/2018/09/26/my-… via @RespectIsVital
English
Stuart Not Provan
4K posts
Stuart Not Provan
@ProvanStuart
Universal credit ruined almost cost my own life twice. Many have died, more suffer due DWP. It will never improve as u can't fix failure. l Studied whole system
Scotland, United Kingdom 加入时间 Haziran 2012
611 关注360 粉丝
@Shrink_at_Large It's a case of to big to fail #UniversalCredit it was the biggest overhaul to the benefit in history. Yet it failed so badly instead of scrapping it instead they have spent billions since the 1st year which is now so overbudget there's no money even if we had a plan b.
English
Even the OBR has admitted past disability benefit reforms (like the move from DLA to PIP) didn’t save what was promised. And Universal Credit delays dragged on for years. But still—they press ahead though we are gaining real momentum against these deadly
Cuts.
English
New: “A major rebellion appears to be hardening on the Labour benches rather than subsiding, despite frantic efforts by whips and government ministers to talk MPs round”. More and more MPs are increasingly on side👏 keep up the pressure🙌 spoons allowing💫 tinyurl.com/2hjeexra
English
@paulapeters2 @1kilroywashere @BadPutty @RandolphTrent @BenClaimant @BlokeOnWheels @RichardBurgon @pplsassembly Spending it with great responsibility as I have to take care as am on a tight budget. Something you probably don't understand going by your track record. So is this some sort of a learning question for your own assessment in a bid 2 help u improve your decisions or the system
English
#PIP
The vile & toxic department of worry & persecution are sending out a horrific survey to to ask disabled people in receipt of PIP how they spend their money
The DWP have no legal right to ask & you have no legal obligation to fill it in
English
@Yorkshire1986 @Gamergody Officially they said to me they only data for 2 years then it Gets destroyed. I had asked for 3 years in which I got? 54 phone calls I got zero! 72 documents were confirmed missing. Got about 1100 documents. Wow the lies I found were insane. Took ages 2 prepare for my lawyer! Won
English
@Gamergody I did. I put from 2004 or 2005 couldn't remember the exact year to now. Only got 10 years worth.
English
If anyone wants to give DWP the massive middle finger effectively, and haven't done this already, perform a Subject Access Request for any and all date they hold on you, including webchats, phonecalls, and any other data. It'll be free and costs them money (around £500...
English
@CounsellingSam @MartinJBonner @MailOnline @DailyMirror @guardian @thetimes @Telegraph @Independent @theipaper @M_Star_Online That fiqure stinks of the smell of a target
Which in the past has been confirmed. Of course you will deny. Yet 1 fact is clear. % of appeals will already have a backlog. Costing more money and suffering. As the BS appeals process as 4 DMs rejects a court makes fair decisions
English
HUGE BREAKING NEWS, courtesy of the brilliant @MartinJBonner.
Under Labour’s EVIL #DISABILITYBENEFITS CUTS,
87% of people will lose their Basic Daily Living PIP!
@MailOnline @DailyMirror @guardian @thetimes @Telegraph @Independent @theipaper @M_Star_Online
Would SOMEONE pick this HUGE STORY up!
English
@MartinJBonner Which instantly means the baglog will already be bad and as each day passes it will grow worse. That's what happens when you try and fix failure with failure and it's the claiment that always suffers from any failure.
English
The DWP have responded to my FoI request. Their figures indicate that 87% of clamants currently receiving PIP daily living component at the standard rate, and 13% of claimants receiving the enhanced rate, are likely to lose their entitlement if the "score 4" changes go ahead.
English
As expected you can't fix failure with failure yet they through more money at it until this fails enough for the next process and we start all over again.
LurgeeLiz@LurgeeLife
Another separate DWP FOI tallies with one from 14 Apr '25 👇 indicating 46% of PIP claimants do not score > 4 point on any one daily living component. Total no. of PIP = 2.89m with 1.33m of those scoring < 4 = 46%
English
@LurgeeLife @de_varse As expected after the promise of fairness or better BS said to the assessment process as officially as stats don't lie the truth is the process has not improved as promised which causes great concern towards my own health as there is no guarantee of receiving a fair assessment
English
Another separate DWP FOI tallies with one from 14 Apr '25 👇 indicating 46% of PIP claimants do not score > 4 point on any one daily living component. Total no. of PIP = 2.89m with 1.33m of those scoring < 4 = 46%
Martin Bonner 🦋 @argentas.bsky.social@MartinJBonner
The DWP have responded to my FoI request. Their figures indicate that 87% of clamants currently receiving PIP daily living component at the standard rate, and 13% of claimants receiving the enhanced rate, are likely to lose their entitlement if the "score 4" changes go ahead.
English
This was written by the same people just last week! Nobody would have lost money on HRMC yet when it comes to #dwpgovuk and #UniversalCredit you sign up to fail. Yet even when 32% had failed to sign up resulting in having there benefits terminatied.
English
Stuart Not Provan 已转推
So legacy benefits paid by HRMC people have no choice as they are being forced onto #UniversalCredit which everyone will be deeply concerned about. As child poverty payments will be #dwpgovuk responsibility.
Institute for Fiscal Studies@TheIFS
“Tax credits will leave a lasting legacy of a welfare system more focused on low-income families with children, which lives on in universal credit.” Read Matt Oulton and Tom Wernham’s full briefing here: ifs.org.uk/articles/how-d…
English
It would be much easier to write a a book about the #UniversalCredit as there is so much controversy before it even started which am trying to give u some insight but with so many documents that prove UC is by far the worst idea to the benefit system in history. U sign up 2 fail
English
There were tons of warnings and evidence inc assements not finished, Sanctions never tested! Yet the brand new system half hearted tested. Would fail completely in months. billions lost! Then the statement classic @DWPgovuk move trying 2 deflect the BS
English
The Committee expresses concern that those reforms have resulted in severe economic hardship, increased reliance on food banks, homelessness, negative impacts on mental health and the stigmatization of benefit claimants. report from 12th March 2025
English
Has Disproportionally affecting persons with disabilities, low-income families and workers in precarious employment.
English
The Committee is concerned that measures introduced through the Welfare reform of 2012 and the Welfare Reform in 2016, including benefit cuts and temporary reductions in or the suspension of benefits, have eroded the rights to social security and to an adequate standard of living
English
justfair.org.uk/a-wake-up-call… Human rights are back 2010 warned. 2016 Un requested a report but the @DWPgovuk refused. In Dec 2017 UN wrote a report to the point of attacking the @DWPgovuk for Austerity levels, inc sanctions lead poverty. 2010 UC being online, this caused turmoil
English
I have many of these dating back 2 before #UniversalCredit was made puplic. The not for puplic eyes to read! jrf.org.uk/social-securit…(and,to%20get%20back%20into%20work.
English
@ProvanStuart It's so bizarre that normal safety measures, which are equivalent to seat belts, are dismissed by assessors.
English
#PIP descriptors. Thread proving someone needing help with *all* the following would not qualify under new rules: cutting food, wash below waist, can’t do therapy w/o others, get out of bath, need prompt re:continence, dress below waist, can't hear/speak + #DisabilityRights
English
@de_varse This is what I mean by using AI it saves you reading 1000s of BS for months. This was 1 tactic I used against them. The more I learnt it became more apparent that policys were ignored yet the lying was insane. Why because the system didn't work most of the time.
English
