Vector

@EricSpracklen your fallacy is "false generalization"

American cities are literally crumbling while we are spending billions every day fighting a war in Iran. When will we end the madness and put America first?

Owens is un-educated and therefore uses common logical fallacies as persuasive vehicles. This is ad hominem - being LDS or from Utah does not logically invalidate someone's reporting. Owens shifts the focus from "is the corruption/fraud he reported real?" to "He's a Mormon from Utah, so it must be false."

Nick Shirley “is also a member of the LDS Church…and he also happens to be from Utah.” Ok I know this has already gone viral, but I hadn’t seen her full Shirley criticism until now. The thing that is most striking to me is how she randomly throws in there that he’s Mormon and from Utah. And of course, the implication is “that’s suspicious”—as we know she’s already implicated Mormons in 9/10 back in December when she went on her weird Courtney Love/Britney Spears tangent. This is such a crazy, irresponsible, unprofessional thing to do. In no world is simply being Mormon or from Utah suspicious. Imagine if someone was like, “well Candace is ‘Catholic’ and she also happens to be black” as a mark of suspicion. How do people not understand this isn’t how actual investigations work? Moreover, she could’ve waited for Shirley’s response before going live with her psychotic suspicions. She admits she only messaged him earlier that day, and he might’ve not yet had time to get back to her. But she says all this anyway. Why? Because she likes to create drama and chaos. She’s an entertainer who thrives on discord.

Propaganda words work so well

@MichaelRapaport Of course not. She denies the truth and therefore spews only lies.

Has Candace Owens gotten any closer on solving the Charlie Kirk mrder?

@EYakoby She’s both a fool and a liar.

5 months ago btw.

@nosoup4knowles She is certainly a wolf.

Candace says "oh my God" in the middle of a rant about how Christian women talk about "the Lord" too much. She says it doesn't feel Christian to her & that it's just a shield. She also tells Christian women not to quote the Bible when criticizing people. "Just stop doing that."

Small objects can show that gravity is real. The Cavendish experiment proved that even tiny masses pull on each other, showing gravity works everywhere, not just between planets.

.@MattWalshBlog on the Erika Kirk attacks: “Using lies and deceit to destroy someone’s reputation…personally I put you on the same level as like a murderer. It’s a form of murder. It’s like you’re killing someone’s reputation.” Candace watched Charlie’s assassination, and now she’s trying to character assassinate his wife. It really is murder adjacent. It’s why Christ compared hating your brother to killing him in your heart.

@MattWalshBlog 🤣

Say what you want about the guy but he obviously ran an extraordinary campaign

@benryanwriter There is strong consensus in biology that sex is defined by reproductive role (anisogamy). Disagreement exists only in how to operationalize or measure sex-related traits in complex or atypical cases—not in the underlying definition itself.

NEW PAPER: There is No Consensus on Biological Sex The authors include Andy Lee, PhD (he/they) of Perdue; Madeline Eppley (they/them), a PhD candidate at Northeastern; and Ally Swank, MS (they them), a PhD student at Boston U. "There is ongoing scientific and societal discourse on the definition of biological sex. At this critical moment when misinformation about sex is being applied to policy globally, scientific clarification is valuable. Here, we evaluate the primary approaches to defining sex and synthesise the active discourse to conclude that there is no current consensus on a definition of sex that is free of assumptions and limitations. While there is no current consensus, we do not advocate for a single definition and contend that a lack of unanimity is not inherently problematic. No matter what definitional choices are used, we provide actionable recommendations to improve accuracy when describing sex. Most importantly, regardless of scientific debates, no biological definition of sex should be used to dictate human rights. "Lack of unanimity on how to define sex is not inherently problematic and we contend that a universal definition is not necessary to pursue. Scientists should be specific and clear when discussing sex and sex-related traits to advance more accurate science and discussions. Active debate and discourse lead to better understandings of complex biological diversity. Regardless of how sex is defined, research that documents and describes the diversity and variation of sex in nature should and will continue in biology (Aanen et al. 2016). Our ultimate goal is to prompt critical thinking and discussion about how we operationalise sex in research, encourage consideration of the ethical and political implications of defining sex and urge acknowledgment that there is no current consensus on a single definition of sex. Most importantly, we assert that biology should not dictate human rights." Methinks @SwipeWright will have some thoughts...

@NJBeisner Candace is a liar. Nothing she says is trustworthy. She also has zero reasoning abilities, perhaps due to her lack of education.

Candace sarcastically says, “Charlie was evangelical, doesn’t matter that he was going to mass everyday.” Charlie was evangelical. It’s literally one of the last words out of his mouth. According to her theory, he was privately Catholic while maintaining a public confession of Protestantism? So he was a liar? Two-faced? Ashamed of being Catholic? Also, I love how it’s morphed into he was going to Mass EVERY DAY. 😂

@TJTheWheelDeal Anthropic, with all its messaging problems, is ahead. Ultimately, I think Grok will eat OpenAIs lunch and then there is Gemini. so, no, i would not subscribe

If you could invest in a round of Open AI, would you? Our contact at JP MORGAN brought the deal to us today. 880B valuation for 25B in revenue is steep. Yeah yeah yeah, but they will own the space. Will they? Then there is Sam. He’s just got an off vibe. What say you?

@TJTheWheelDeal Yes I did

Did you buy the dip on $Sofi today bc you think the short report is bullshit? Type yes so I can follow you :) I like following smart folks.

The fact is that Charlie Kirk was murdered by a left wing militant. And that’s far from the only act of brutal violence by a leftist even just over the past year. In response, there hasn’t been any kind of major nationwide crackdown on leftist extremists and the organizations that fund and encourage them. There hasn’t been any concerted response of any kind. It just hasn’t happened. But don’t worry: Democrats will take power and do to us exactly what we didn’t have the focus or fortitude to do to them. The whole thing is enraging.

@RealCandaceO @MattWalshBlog By the way, Matt Walsh has debunked you. He went through your mountain of malicious lies and concluded, "There's no case here. There's no evidence of anything. These attacks on Erika by Candace and everyone else are wrong. Deeply, desperately wrong." x.com/MattWalshBlog/…

@NJBeisner Candace will increasingly fall into complete obscurity. She adds no value through commentary and has a reasoning impairment.

“I made that statement, and the White House hasn’t disputed it!” “The silence on things that are just so easy to respond to. Like if someone messaged me and said, ‘hey Candace, we heard that back when you were working in New York City that you had keys to a white house and you were ushering in models,’ I’d be like, ‘I have no idea what you’re talking about. This is not true.’ Erika’s not doing that!” One thing Candace hates more than anything else—even more than people laughing at or making jokes about her—is when big-name people ignore her. She CANNOT STAND that Erika is currently ignoring her and won’t respond to questions any longer, just like she has never been able to stand that the White House didn’t make a statement on her allegations that the Macrons took a hit out on her life as well as the fact that Trump hasn’t said anything about the Macrons suing her She can’t stand it. She tries to paint their silence as evidence of their guilt (because that’s just how dishonest and manipulative she is), but you can tell it’s eating her up inside by the way she references it over and over and over again for weeks and months now.

@CPSellsOptions Literally? Newsflash?

@EYakoby so intellectually dishonest ...

BREAKING: Tucker Carlson has a psychotic meltdown and calls Ben Shapiro one of the “dumbest people.” Is that why Tucker Carlson refuses to debate Ben?

@piersmorgan @grok 😂 What, your followers are negative on someone you criticize therefore you must be right?

Wow... the comments below this say it all.. @grok says 90% are negative towards Little Benji! People see right through his pathetic ‘If you criticise the Israeli govt then you’re antisemitic!’ propaganda.

@GavinNewsom Freedom for unborn babies.

The “freedom” party strikes again.