Benjamin Wright

3.3K posts

Benjamin Wright

Benjamin Wright

@ben_wright_

husband, dad, pastor, busy, happy https://t.co/kwK3Aixy1q @sebts alum, dishwasher loader par excellence

Austin, Texas 加入时间 Mayıs 2009
168 关注856 粉丝
置顶推文
Benjamin Wright
Benjamin Wright@ben_wright_·
💯 Lots of Warren/Hybels ministry philosophy masquerading these days as a Reformed flex. Warren profiled the guy he wanted to reach: "Saddleback Sam." Fine-tuned church to attract him. Today we see the same strategy, just different packaging. Say, Dominion Dave? Heritage Hank?
Jeff Wiesner@JeffreyPWiesner

If a cultural zeitgeist compels a preacher to substantially change the tone and emphasis of his preaching because he suspects that’s will attract more people to him… He’s an ear tickler.

English
2
0
13
2.1K
Jeff Wiesner
Jeff Wiesner@JeffreyPWiesner·
As we have been renovating our new church property, and thinking about strategic weekends like this one, this post from the vault came to mind. I still appreciate many things from my megachurch days.
Jeff Wiesner@JeffreyPWiesner

Something I appreciate about my time on staff for a prominent megachurch was the care for excellence in aesthetics, branding, hospitality, communication, and more. Now I pastor a smaller church that emphasizes the means of grace over programs. And I wonder if there's a tendency for like-sized and like-minded churches to overreact against mega-excellence by wearing mediocrity as a badge of honor: "We just preach the Word." But must the means of grace and care for excellence be mutually exclusive? May it never be! It's not a mark of spiritual maturity for someone to look past an outdated, circa-1998 website, undrinkable coffee, and chilly non-hospitality and conclude, "But hey! They preach expositional sermons!" We should want all kinds of people to come into our churches—not just those who are already pre-disposed to our confessional commitments—be blessed by what they experience and want to come back a second time. It's okay to want LOTS of visitors in our churches and desire for our membership rolls to grow! To that end, it's a good thing to make our "front door" attractive and hospitable. It's good to have a clean, updated website. It's good to have clear, well-designed signage to help visitors know their way around. It's good to invest in fresh branding that graduates from clip-art logos. It's good to brew the very best coffee you can. It's good to create well-trained ministry teams tasked with serving visitors with excellence. It's good to rehearse transitions in your order of service to avoid unnecessary awkwardness. It's okay to expect our people to read, sing, or play instruments with excellence to the extent of their natural abilities. To my skeptical, eye-rolling friend, that's not "church growth" philosophy, but wisdom and worship. True, nobody gets saved by these things. But it all communicates care or the lack thereof. Is the God who arrayed lilies with beauty beyond Solomon's comprehension unworthy of comparatively trivial care for excellence on our parts? All to say, I think small churches have a few things to learn from mega-churches. I've long left behind a programmatic ministry philosophy for means of grace ministry. I'm as concerned about worldly pragmatism and fleshly consumerism as anyone. And this isn't about having mega-budgets and mega-staffs. Excellence will be relative to the resources God has entrusted to each congregation. But hear me out: What if some people never step foot in our churches the first time or return to our churches a second time NOT because they're shallow "consumers" but because we appear as careless stewards? Amen! We should care about the Word and sacrament above all. But the Lord's appointed means of grace shouldn't discourage or dissuade us from caring about excellence in all things. If anything, it should make us more excellent, all by his grace and all to his glory!

English
4
1
16
3.2K
Brandon Lansdown
Brandon Lansdown@BrandonLansdown·
Race is not neutral, optional, or a sub-Christian category. It’s a creational reality ordained by God. The Bible does not treat the human race as a homogenized blob where particular peoples and their majorities are irrelevant. Acts 17:26 declares God "made from one man every nation of mankind" and "determined allotted periods and the boundaries of their dwelling place." Revelation 7:9 and 21:24 envision the redeemed as distinct nations, tribes, and tongues, not a deracinated mass. Pretending race is some alien import "under the hood" of Christianity is a rootless Gnosticism that severs the faith from the actual world God made. Hunter’s position collapses into self-refuting absurdity when applied consistently: Christians should shrug at the demographic erasure of ancient Christian peoples because "race isn't a category." Tell a father he has no business ensuring his own children's inheritance because family isn't a Christian category either. The same logic that dismisses concern for a people's survival also guts 1 Timothy 5:8 — “if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.” Kinship is not idolatry; it's the ordinary order of creation. Elevating abstract universal dignity while erasing the particular bonds God embedded in history is not piety, it's sentimental disintegration dressed in pietistic jargon. This is a post-1960s evangelical coping mechanism: a hyper-individualistic regenerate-church obsession fused with Civil Rights-era colorblind rhetoric and allergic reaction to anything smelling of Christian nationalism. It requires rewriting history so that Crusaders defending Christendom, colonial founders preserving their stock, and every pre-modern Christian nation-builder were all secretly motivated by un-Christian "under the hood" motives. This framework teaches believers to not resist their own replacement in the name of the gospel, while the faith historically flourishes among rooted peoples and withers when those peoples are dissolved. Caring about preserving your people's majority in your homeland is not racism. It is basic pattern recognition, creational stewardship, and obedience to the God who sets boundaries for nations. Indifference to it is not gospel fidelity, but suicidal universalism. In an age of mass migration, differential birthrates, and deliberate demographic engineering, it functions as pastoral malpractice that leaves Christians spiritually unequipped to love their own or defend the inheritance passed down through blood, soil, and faith. The nations are not accidents. God made them, and His people have every right and duty to endure as distinct peoples within them.
Hunter Baker@hunterbaker

I don't understand why any Christian cares about preserving a majority for a particular race. That's not a category for us. If it is, then something else is under the hood of the vehicle, but not Christianity.

English
7
12
91
2.7K
Benjamin Wright
Benjamin Wright@ben_wright_·
@UnitedStandMUFC We'll regret the ones we don't move on more than the ones we do. But the answer is Casemiro.
English
0
0
2
172
The United Stand
The United Stand@UnitedStandMUFC·
With Marcus Rashford looking like he could stay at Barcelona permanently and Joshua Zirkzee linked with a move back to Italy, are we about to let too much talent walk out the door? ✈️ We’ve seen players leave OT and suddenly find their world-class form again. Out of everyone rumoured to leave this summer, who do you think we’ll regret selling the most? 🤔 👇
The United Stand tweet mediaThe United Stand tweet mediaThe United Stand tweet media
English
86
25
575
53.7K
Benjamin Wright
Benjamin Wright@ben_wright_·
@jrwhitehead Author is Lifeway staff. Chances World Relief handed him a press release, which he lightly reworked?
English
0
0
1
37
Jon Whitehead
Jon Whitehead@jrwhitehead·
Our old friends at the Evangelical Immigration Table are still trying to buy the SBC's voice. EIT-member World Relief just hired Lifeway to conduct a biased survey for SBC consumption, claiming "Protestant pastors" overwhelmingly support open immigration policies. Let's look under the hood. cc: @megbasham baptistpress.com/resource-libra…
English
12
41
152
45.4K
Benjamin Wright 已转推
Erick Erickson
Erick Erickson@EWErickson·
We got a group of men up there who don't believe in having a woman in the pulpit taking orders from a woman in the pulpit twisting scripture in front of them, and they applaud. But did you hear about that Bible verse John Piper tweeted?
Acyn@Acyn

White: You were betrayed and arrested and falsely accused. It's a familiar pattern that our Lord and Savior showed us. You will be victorious in all you put your hand to because God is using you.

English
67
93
729
83.6K
Benjamin Wright
Benjamin Wright@ben_wright_·
Wait is this right??? Genesis 1-2 Creation Genesis 3 sin and judgment Genesis 4-Revelation 19 Jesus Revelation 20 judgment on sin Revelation 21-22 New Creation I mean, it's possible that I judged too hastily. 🤔
English
0
0
1
32
Benjamin Wright
Benjamin Wright@ben_wright_·
Indenting every clause in your exegetical outline one more tab does not, in fact, make your text a chiasm.
English
1
0
7
443
Benjamin Wright
Benjamin Wright@ben_wright_·
Every piece of news I see about the NBA makes me want to watch it less. Unfortunately, that is impossible.
English
0
0
1
120
Benjamin Wright
Benjamin Wright@ben_wright_·
@Byzness @ERLC I don't think you're wrong about our expectations. But in hindsight we looked past his political background, his media presence, and his platform-building instincts. I just don't see any of that in Lenow.
English
0
0
1
231
Benjamin Wright
Benjamin Wright@ben_wright_·
Helpful correction to The Narrative. 10-15% of our church are former Catholics. But I don't know of a single former member or child of a member who's ever converted to Catholicism.
Ryan Burge 📊@ryanburge

Empirically speaking: The movement from Catholic --> Protestant is way larger than the opposite direction. In the 1970s: 8% of Catholics became Protestants 3% of Protestants became Catholic. In the 2020s: 12% of Catholics -> Protestants 3% of Protestants -> Catholic

English
0
0
3
194