inHuman (✴️,♦️)

1.3K posts

inHuman (✴️,♦️) banner
inHuman (✴️,♦️)

inHuman (✴️,♦️)

@hcomcept

working class palantir agent

Berghain, Berlin 加入时间 Aralık 2019
541 关注556 粉丝
Griz
Griz@GrizMeta·
what happened….
Griz tweet media
English
75
46
749
23.1K
Tekee
Tekee@Tekeee·
$1M in your 20s is worth more than $100M in your 80s.
English
25
20
307
19.3K
Mercury
Mercury@TraderMercury·
> "no Merc, you don't understand: $BTC is outperforming because it's up 30% off the lows, as $SPY is only up 13% off the lows!" life must be a lot more peaceful when you're this dumb.
Mercury tweet mediaMercury tweet media
English
14
7
155
10.1K
Minion
Minion@0xminion·
It's so over for crypto, my hk crypto degen groups are talking abt how HK IPOs are so free money these days, and no one is talking abt crypto.
English
11
1
79
8K
MetaHacker
MetaHacker@metahacker_·
I frankly don't care about Bitcoin anymore Don't hold any. Don't plan to hold any. Could go to a million dollars and I wouldn't care I got into this industry for ideological reasons and I've stuck around through the absolute clownery only because of ideological reasons To watch the orange coin squander every single principled position just to suck off the teat of Wall Street and the Trump admin means that I really can't justify holding it ideologically Still bullish on crypto though. But BTC just isn't for me anymore. Not as long as these two are have their fingers squashed deep in the BTC pie
MetaHacker tweet mediaMetaHacker tweet media
English
2
0
3
27
inHuman (✴️,♦️)
@metahacker_ indeed the days of exponential returns are over dogmatic hodlers got replaced by opportunistic mercenaries dotcom meta
English
0
0
1
9
MetaHacker
MetaHacker@metahacker_·
@hcomcept yeah I've been off the BTC train ever since the industry decided to abandon core libertarian principles and pursue state approval that, and the moral hazard of Saylor cornering supply using complicated financial ponzis
English
1
0
1
8
chang
chang@chang_defi·
Short AI Short Pokemon Short Analog Long Robotics Long Deep Sea Research Long MMO Gaming
English
14
1
60
2.5K
Aporia
Aporia@0xaporia·
@TechDev_52 If by “unpopular” you mean “repeatedly disproven, overfitted, retroactively adjusted, and not useful to any extent” then yes, it is extremely unpopular. Possibly because it’s wrong.
English
5
1
108
3.3K
TechDev
TechDev@TechDev_52·
Unpopular opinion: The first macro cycle since 2020 may finally be starting.
TechDev tweet media
English
112
268
2K
125.4K
StayStrong
StayStrong@RegisG05292932·
@TheGreekGod11 lol, your rant is childish and you are making classic crypto investor mistake. Expecting future performance based on past results. There were tons of things happened in crypto, that changed a overall landscape, so it's naive to expect 2021-22 like future performance.
English
1
0
1
99
Grand Inquisitor Cicero
Grand Inquisitor Cicero@TheGreekGod11·
I will never understand how pathetic this space has become. This has NEVER been the case in any cycle before. I still vividly remember how things were in 2022. The bull run was for real over (and it WAS an actual bullrun with 2 major alt seasons and multiple random rally’s). We were crashing hard, over and over. But the timeline? Boy, oh boy. Everyone was still BULLISH. People were still going strong, fighting for their bags, being hopeful and cheerful for the future. The environment was healthy, strong and most especially POSITIVE. Yes, sure, there were perhaps a handful of bears painting charts, but over 90% was extremely positive still. Now, let‘s compare this to today… We had no alt season, no actual bull run, alts have been only going downhill for more than 5 years, people were bearish throughout the entire cycle, even at 126k BTC (which was still a joke of a ATH) and then… Then everyone absolutely lost their minds. Every big KOL has turned GIGA bearish, they have been screaming and begging for 30k BTC month for month. To the point that the entire sentiment shifted into extreme negative. Like brainwashing, every account on CT has copied this opinion and started shouting from the roofs. "40k next" "lower lows incoming" "obvious bull trap" "crypto is dead" "bottom by October" And so on. It feels eerily similar to how things looked like during covid times. I shit you not, this is some form of mental programming. Everyone is so sure that the 4 year cycle is still in play that they will FIGHT YOU for being bullish, which has never happened in crypto before. If we compare this to the previous cycle or heck, even to 2018/2019, it has turned into the total opposite. Back then, yes people were aware that there was a 4 year cycle and we had entered a bear market, and yet the majority was still positive. But now it‘s some kind of a sacrilege to think positively for this space. All of these absolute cucks have sold their souls or bags to promote the doom of crypto. It even goes as far as shaming bulls AND getting aggressive and defensive and negative on every single leg up. Can you imagine that? LOL. BEING NEGATIVE ON GREEN CANDLES?! You truly can‘t make this shit up anymore. And all of this is just straight proof that the great majority (over 95%) are sidelined and would bet their lives on an outcome that leads to lower lows and a bleed throughout this entire year. Completely dismissing the actual fact that the 4-year cycle is broken and we never had any form of alt season, euphoria or actual bull *RUN*. This mental breakdown of CT needs to be studied. Most likely the 5 years of bearishness has caused this, but perhaps there‘s more to it, as this form of programming seems anything but coincidental.
English
35
18
208
5.9K
Arnold Bernault
Arnold Bernault@ahitposter·
a literal pedophile has a take on social game theory
Arnold Bernault tweet media
English
3
0
43
1.3K
youc🌹
youc🌹@Youclidean·
@Credib1eGuy @Bonecondor married to a psych who specialises in eating disorders so feel compelled to point out that sound bytes like "fix the mind and obesity doesn't exist" might seem smart / catchy but are a profound over-simplification & misunderstanding of the problem set faced by most.
English
1
0
3
48
Guy
Guy@Credib1eGuy·
All this peptide and retratide whatever stuff, GLP, ozempic etc I feel like it’s gonna come out with some crazy bad side effects or consequences in 10 years It’s just common sense nothing in life has no trade offs
English
274
21
1K
372.5K
Jon Stokes
Jon Stokes@JDStokes79·
@DavidAstinWalsh "Late capitalism" is a flashing neon sign that says "I have no understanding of economics, so I substitute assumptions and prejudices that align with what I want to believe and treat them as reality."
English
1
0
51
467
𝐃𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐫𝐲 - biofoundationalism.com
Feminized perception of “truth” boils down to Manichean sentiment analysis. Does this idea have kind valence or mean valence? The goal is harmony preservation, regardless of its relationship to truth or reality. It's not lying for the sake of lying, but because the mentality is one of maintaining social standing. A survival strategy manifesting as reputation management. We evolved in settings where exile meant death. Truth won't feed or protect you. But being liked will. Women are particularly sensitive to this influence. For simple reason: they’re smaller and can’t physically impose their will. Feminized use of language will say things like “words are violence” and actually mean it, because assaulting feelings and perception is warfare to the feminine psyche. They don't see things as true or false, they see them as harmonious or disruptive. Does this help my social status or hurt it? Things that increase harmony and status are good, whether or not they are truthful. Things that threaten harmony and status are bad, whether or not they are truthful. Accuracy is an afterthought in this judgment. An endocrine system calibrated for consensus and cooperation (believing), not competition and disagreement (proving). Truth insists you move to prove (empirical test); harmony asks that you sit and believe (rational trust). One lives primarily through the body; the other lives primarily in the mind. The strongest indicator of feminine cognition is its refusal to systemize (e.g. treating everything as new, denying patterns, resisting structure). This mindset will instinctively hunt for exceptions and treat them as rules (“But not all”). It thinks a couple anecdotes undoes an aggregate. Chaotic reasoning. Systemization means rules. Rules mean standards. Standards mean exclusion. And exclusion is not as kind as inclusion…
𝐃𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐫𝐲 - biofoundationalism.com tweet media𝐃𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐫𝐲 - biofoundationalism.com tweet media𝐃𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐫𝐲 - biofoundationalism.com tweet media𝐃𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐫𝐲 - biofoundationalism.com tweet media
William Meijer@williameijer

Highly educated women keep telling me, at the end of conversations about society, “Why do you care about what’s true?” It must have happened a dozen times by now. This has been the single most blackpilling thing I’ve ever had to grapple with

English
8
97
625
29.9K