If a man lost his wife, and they had young children, and he was independently wealthy and didn’t have to work, would you urge him to not work at all and to stay home with his children for a year or until the kids were older since they’d lost their mom—or do you only do this for Erika? I’m just genuinely curious, because I’m pretty traditional, but I’ve never seen any other person—including any woman—held to the standard people are attempting to hold Erika. So I’m just wondering if everyone suddenly and conveniently got majorly trad overnight or what? And if you’re trad, then why aren’t you urging all women who don’t have to work—including Candace—to stay home with the kids so that nannies are never or rarely used?

If you’re being honest, what makes far more sense and is far more defensible is to take a position of “generally speaking wives and mothers shouldn’t work unless they have to, but I’m making an exception for Erika because she’s been dealt a bad hand and is carrying on Charlie’s legacy in the way that he planned for.” It makes little to no sense to say “every other independently wealthy wife and mother can work if she chooses—but not Erika.” 🥴🥴🥴

@NJBeisner If he was independently wealthy he should absolutely take some time with his kids. However, it is different, she was a SAHM. The father is typically the one working outside the home. Why in the world would she stop doing what she advocated was best for her children.

@NJBeisner People aren’t sending her home just because of what she preached, It’s about the fact that she’s contradicted her own values from day one. She misled people about her past and then tried to shut down any questions about Charlie

@NJBeisner Oh just stop with the nonsense. Anyone saying she should stay home with the kids is simply trying to be kind instead of admitting the truth; @MrsErikaKirk is not likable, inauthentic as is evidenced by her latest weird appearance. Heebie Jeebie vibes 🤢🤮

@NJBeisner charlie, the father of her tao children died seven months ago a normal person PHYSICALLY CANT DO WHAT SHES BEEN DOING SINCE DAY FUCKING ONE NOBODY CAN, you dont even have it in you to hold serious conversations you are emotionally physically and mentally exhausted.Erika is FAKE

@NJBeisner In gwneral spouses who murder or knowingly allow the murder of their spouse shouldn't be allowed access to the public much less their deceased spouse's kids. Just sayin'...

@NJBeisner You could at least edit your copy and paste text from the AI you're using, by removing those "—"

@NJBeisner Stop trying to reason with people who can't be reasoned with. Instead let things play out and everyone reap what they sowed - including eat crow.

@NJBeisner This makes no sense to me because obviously the dad should be there for his kids? I feel like this is just showing how low you have the bar for men, not how high the bar is for women. Who wouldn’t be there for their kids after a tragedy? What’s the point to your question?

@NJBeisner Because that’s what both her and Charlie talked about incessantly. That women needed to be home with their small children because the time was precious. It’s a very abrupt about face that seems contradictory to everything she claimed to believe and everything Charlie wanted.

@NJBeisner If they didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards at all. We can't expect much from a bunch of shallow,petty hypocrites.

@NJBeisner Erika has lacked a lot of tact since shes moved to the public eye as CEO. She's not cut for the job, and now she's lecturing us like emotional women do. Widows should take an appropriate amount of time to mourn, especially when they have children and can provide without working.

@NJBeisner It's because Erika portrayed herself as a super-conservative woman who believed women should be home with their children while they are young and now she is not doing that. That makes her a hypocrite.

@NJBeisner They are bullying her because they want TPUSA to collapse.

@NJBeisner Was the man an apparent accomplice in an obvious conspiracy against his wife in this scenario?

@NJBeisner I would stay home. But I am not a public figure. I would be there for them, I would cry with them, and I would always be available for them. Over time, as healing replaced hurt, then we would start finding joy in the journey while always keeping the kids' mom in our hearts.

@NJBeisner Ah! Erika preached to women to stay home, raise kids, work later because raising kids IS the Lords work. THAT’s the difference. Had she not been shoving down mom’s throats no one would have gone after her for it. SHE’S painted her self into all the corners.

@NJBeisner If he were a stay at home dad,& she was the CEO? I would say he should resume his role to not bring too much change in the kids’ life. If he was the CEO and she stayed home? I think three months off is fair, and find two full time nannies, and bring them to work til preschool.

These ppl aren’t “trad”, they are godless losers who never bothered to use their precious time to read the Bible where women did work. That makes them made when you tell them that. They don’t support what the Bible says unless it’s in agreement with their far right or left politics. Heretics.

@NJBeisner TPUSA was her husband's dream. I'm sure she wants it to succeed,plus she may feel close to him being involved. People have been so hard on Erika. People claim to love Charlie, if you love someone-you don't treat their widow like this.

@NJBeisner Even the contrast between Erika Kirk and Vanessa Bryant is interesting, Kobe Bryant's wife. She lost Kobe AND one of their daughters and everyone understood why she took over his companies. No one turned it into a negative. In fact, they rationalized it as her way of healing.

@NJBeisner I have said the same thing would they torture a man whose wife was assassinated and he had two little children and he took over as the CEO of her company. would he be tortured? NO. Nobody would blink an eye! I am so tired of this.

@NJBeisner If you were independently wealthy I think you do what’s best for your kids it doesn’t matter if it’s a man or woman!

@NJBeisner If he was independently wealthy I’d advise him to make the kids his top priority - independently wealthy doesn’t mean no work, but it would allow him to work things around the kids.

@NJBeisner Whataboutism is a fallacious form of argumentation for a reason. Erika is CLEARLY not the best option for CEO. The general public has largely rejected her. She will never be supported the way CK was. If she doesn’t want to be mocked & ridiculed she should just take the advice.

Personally, I don't care who the surviving parent is, if the kids lost a parent is such a horrible, public way and the other parent didn't need to work, they should be home with the kids. Especially so if the surviving parent has the vitriol and controversy chasing them, even if it's undeserved. I give zero fucks about Candace Owens, her opinions, claims, or followers. I also know Erika Kirk can and will do what she thinks is best. That's her right. I just can't help but think maintaining a public profile right now may not be the best idea.

@NJBeisner But the right always preaches that men and women are different and women should stay home. Now you're egalitarian all of a sudden? Really? Really.

@NJBeisner A lot of people got tard.

@NJBeisner One parent should be home with their children. No matter if it’s the mom or the dad. Charlie stated that a mom should be with her children while the husband works. Erika pretended to be on board with it even though her expressions looked disagreeable on stage with him.

@NJBeisner Coretta King marched 4 days after her husband was assassinated. She carried in his legacy but no one attacked her. She had 4 children under the age of 12.