@Fitrah46782412@Randomlyscript@9ushaman@deusimpera You're not "tracking" God is not biological he is metaphysical = What God is
Track here however God can ASSUME a biological form = What God can do
Last time answer my questions and stop dodging.
@Fitrah46782412@Randomlyscript@9ushaman@deusimpera So your point is God taking action.....thats revelationary.
Since you're not answering my questions then I believe we are done, as you don't have an argument, only statements.
I tracked the conversation and your position switched between modalism and partitioning
Both are heresies
I have a question
If Jesus was God; why did Peter call him the servant of God? And why did he always directed his worship to the Father; whom he called the only true God?
@Randomlyscript@Fitrah46782412@9ushaman@deusimpera John contradiction himself then?
John 1:1 The Word was God.
John 1:18 the only-begotten God
John 8:58 Before Abraham was, I AM.
John 20:28 Thomas calls Jesus My Lord and my God.
You assume functional distinction = ontological inequality.
@Randomlyscript@Fitrah46782412@9ushaman@deusimpera Or maybe cherry picking isn't going to help your cause?
Given what Peter stated is not out of line from Paul statement and the rest of John statements. So how about you focus on that?
Out the mouth of 2 or more witness is the standard.
@ChrisTrade4@Fitrah46782412@9ushaman@deusimpera We can stay with Peter if you don’t want to tell me that John is an anonymously written gospel by a community that has nothing to do with Apostle John
Now; for Peter; whom was Jesus a servant of? While he was God?
@Randomlyscript@Fitrah46782412@9ushaman@deusimpera Or you can acknowledge your argument is rediculious given you need to prove verbatim that oral teachings from the apostles is invalid and papyrus was cheap and actually common use like the pen and paper today. Or how about with zero evidence we must just believe Muhammad
@Fitrah46782412@Randomlyscript@9ushaman@deusimpera You're having issues distinguishing between modalism and trinity.
Nevertheless the core belief is the same, which is irrelevant since this isn't Christianity vs Christianity but Islam vs Christianity. AND I believe we are done since you've failed to answer my questions.
@Fitrah46782412@Randomlyscript@9ushaman@deusimpera Answer my question, before you go on about heresy.
Or is this a one way street where you dictate to me I must answer you questions?
Why cant you answer this
1. Can God cease to be God?
2. Does God have sovereign free will?
@Fitrah46782412@Randomlyscript@9ushaman@deusimpera And final part 6
These admissions prove that the Son acting as in the Incarnation is fully compatible with being God, making your claims about separate consciousnesses or modalism logically impossible.
@Fitrah46782412@Randomlyscript@9ushaman@deusimpera You stated Yes God has free sovereign will
Now your contradicting yourself.
God has the sovereignty free will to self limit in a mode of operation.
Was God being a semi God when he restrained himself from wiping out the Israelites when they worshipped the Golden Calf?
@Fitrah46782412@Randomlyscript@9ushaman@deusimpera So show me where divinity was changed.
John 1:14
The Word became flesh.
Action added, essence unchanged.
Where's the change in divinity?
Hebrews 13:8
“Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever.”
Malachi 3:6
“For I the Lord do not change.”
@ChrisTrade4@Fitrah46782412@9ushaman@deusimpera The Quran is the word of Gods
The Gospels are the biographies of the life of Jesus
The Quran in itself proves it can only come form God
The Gospels must establish eyewitness authorship and mutual attestation to be credible
@Randomlyscript@Fitrah46782412@9ushaman@deusimpera The Quran is not the word of God. You've failed to provide Muhammad actually met Gabriel. Wheres the proof? Your god makes the same human logical error of the trinity, doesn't understand metaphysics but besides that, legally it is has no legal standing.