@PeterAn72142511@welt Tatsächlich nicht und zeigt mal wieder, dass Empfindungen von vielen Menschen über tatsächliche Statistiken gestellt werden. Bist leider dem Populismus aufgesessen.
@welt Was für eine Unverschämtheit so etwas zu behaupten.
Die meisten Frauen haben ein sicheres Zuhause wo die geschützt sind.
Es gibt nur Einzelfälle wo das nicht der Fall ist.
Aber das dürft ihr wahrscheinlich nicht schreiben von bestimmten Kräften.
Another #FM26 giveaway!
You just need to retweet and follow me to enter, winner will be announced as soon as Advanced Access begins!
If you can't wait, don't forget you can pre-order for £38.94 using discount code LOLLUJO here: bit.ly/FM26lollujo#ad
Time for another #FM26 giveaway!
You just need to retweet and follow me to enter, winner will be announced 10th October.
If you can't wait, don't forget you can pre-order for £38.94 using discount code LOLLUJO here: bit.ly/FM26lollujo#ad
#FM26 Giveaway 🚨 We will be selecting one lucky FM Fan and hand out a free copy of Football Manager 26! 👀
How to enter? Follow @fminside & Retweet this message ❤️
A lucky winner will be contacted on October 1st, receiving a Steam key with early access for FM26 😎
May the odds be ever in your favour! Good luck! 🍀
@meaglon3@FraukePetry Kapitalismus ist gleichzusetzen mit Privateigentum. Das heißt je höher die Eigentumsrechtsverletzungen des Staates sind, desto sozialistischer ist das Land. Also je höher die Steuern, desto sozialistischer ist das Land.
@ahahn94@derJamesJackson Kann man so drehen.
Man könnte auch sagen der RBeitrStV ist das, was die öffentlich rechtlichen finanziert. "Ganz oder Teilweise" weil ja inzwischen ja wohl auch Werbung geschaltet wird😎
@161_161_@ConstantinLeFev@mdedetrich@GermanyDiplo@SecRubio You are fact-resistant. The National Socialist German Workers' Party was socialist's. The fact that it was totalitarian and banned other organizations does not make it any less socialistic. Stalin, Pol Pot, and Mao were also totalitarian, it comes with the territory.
Germany just gave its spy agency new powers to surveil the opposition. That’s not democracy—it’s tyranny in disguise.
What is truly extremist is not the popular AfD—which took second in the recent election—but rather the establishment’s deadly open border immigration policies that the AfD opposes.
Germany should reverse course.
@ConstantinLeFev@mdedetrich@GermanyDiplo@SecRubio Your thinking of right and left wing is way too easy. An economy based on private ownership and forced labor is the opposite of socialism. Socialism empowers workers; Hitler’s regime suppressed them and served capital and war.
The discussion is getting semantic. The collectivisation of means of production would, in my vocabulary, fit under Marxism /communism, but I know Marx himself called it 'socialism'. As for H.'s so-called cooperation with corporations : H. did not put in place policies to enrich company shareholders. The companies were simply enrolled to collaborate in the war effort. As for abolishment of trade unions. That is indeed true. But, he replaced it with a state-controlled (= left wing) apparatus to set employment conditions. You will read everywhere on the internet that it impoverished the working class and caused inflation. But it is not true. The conditions of the working class in the 1918 - 1933 period were far worse than in 1933 - 1938. That period was called the German economic miracle at the time. That is also why H. was so incredibly popular with the working class at the time.
@ConstantinLeFev@mdedetrich@GermanyDiplo@SecRubio Major corporations like Krupp, IG Farben, and Siemens profited enormously under Hitler. While the economy was directed by the state, private ownership remained intact. Corporations profited aswell because of forced labor. Not very socialist.
@ConstantinLeFev@mdedetrich@GermanyDiplo@SecRubio Hitler cooperated closely with large corporations (e.g., IG Farben, Krupp), trade unions were dismantled, and workers' councils were banned. There was no intention to abolish private ownership of the means of production which is a core principle of socialism.
Well, thank you for acknowledging that H. had left wing policies and that he persecuted communists. That's what I said. Now, if you had answered that his policies were actually nationalistic and that there are overlaps between nationalistic and socialistic policies, I would have said : " Ok, fair enough." But, stating that it was right wing crony capitalism (such as f.e. Reaganomics) is blatantly incorrect.
@ConstantinLeFev@GermanyDiplo@SecRubio Thats utter bullshit. Hitlers social measures served purposes like war preparation and social control, not redistribution or workers' empowerment. Private businesses remained central, and trade unions were crushed. That contradicts socialist principles
@161_161_@GermanyDiplo@SecRubio I did... a lot. If you look at Hitler's social and economic program (public works, paid holidays for workers, social benefits, etc.) it's 100% socialist. It was a mix of socialism and nationalism, whereas communism is a mix of (extreme) socialism and internationalism.
@GermanyDiplo@SecRubio 🧚♀️Wenn das Ergebnis eindeutig ist müssten Sie es transparent darstellen können. Aber wie immer nichts . Es wird auch nichts weiter passieren nicht wahr ?
Concerning your history: if you are referring to a certain party that came to power in 1933, it was leftwing (that's why it had an 'S' in its name) and the fun fact is that they did exactly the same as you are doing now, albeit with the communists, which they censored and prosecuted. So, you are not learning from history, you are repeating it !