Eeswar

The real meaning of tolerance in a free society. You can believe with all your heart that another person’s religion is completely wrong and still treat them with full respect as a human being. You don’t have to agree with them. You don’t have to say “all religions are equally true.” You just have to respect their right to believe differently, and they must respect yours. That’s it. The problem with the Allahabad High Court’s ruling is that it crosses this line. The court didn’t say: “You can believe your religion is the only true one, just don’t insult or attack people.” Instead, it basically said: “Publicly stating that your religion is the only true one is itself wrong and hurts others.” In other words, the court is not just asking for respect, it is asking you to hide or change a core part of your belief in public. That is very different from simple tolerance. True tolerance says: “I believe you are wrong, but I respect you as a person and will not harm you.” The court’s approach says: “You are not even allowed to say out loud that you believe others are wrong — because that itself is disrespectful.” That turns freedom of belief into freedom of belief only if you keep quiet about it. Believing “my faith is the only true one” while still respecting other human beings is not hatred or crime, it is normal religious conviction. The law should punish actual abuse or violence, not the honest expression of what a religion teaches. “Believe what you want, but respect the citizen”, is a fair and practical way to live in a diverse country like India. The court’s order makes it sound like that is no longer enough.

The real problem with this court order is not just one priest’s words. It is much bigger. Many religions, like Judaism, Christianity and Islam teach that theirs is the only true religion. This is not a rare opinion. It is the very heart of their faith. The Bible says Jesus is “the way, the truth, and the life” and no one reaches God except through Him. That belief is what makes the religion what it is. But the Allahabad High Court has now said: “It is wrong for any religion to claim that it is the only true religion.” The court called such a claim “disparaging” to other faiths and refused to protect the priest. Think about what this really means: The court is telling believers: “You can follow your religion… but only if you stop saying out loud what your own scriptures teach.” It is asking them to change the fundamentals of their faith just to live peacefully in India. In simple words: “We will accept your religion only if you first accept that your religion is wrong (or at least keep quiet about it).” This is not fair. The Constitution gives every Indian the right to practise and preach their religion freely. The court’s job is to protect that right and keep peace, not to decide what is “correct” belief and what is “wrong” belief. By saying “claiming only one true religion is wrong,” the court is quietly pushing a Hindu-style idea that all religions are equally true (what people call “all paths are the same”). That idea may be beautiful for some, but it is not part of Christianity or Islam. Forcing it on them is like the court rewriting their religion from the judge’s chair and enforcing polytheism on the people who follow monotheism. Courts should stop crimes that actually hurt people or create riots. They should not tell any religion, “Change your basic teachings or stay silent.” That is not protecting harmony, that is changing the faith itself. In short: You cannot protect someone’s right to follow a religion by first forcing the religion to stop being what it is. That is not justice. That is the state deciding what people are allowed to believe in public.

Only Yogi model governance can save Telangana and Andhra. Or else hindus will fall into the minority in 2 decades. Tharvatha Rama Navami vere states ki poyi cheskovalsina situation vasthadi...

𝐀𝐧𝐝𝐡𝐫𝐚’𝐬 𝐍𝐞𝐰 𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐌𝐚𝐩 🗳️📈 📊 The Population Projection: According to the latest demographic report, Andhra Pradesh’s population is projected in 2027 census is in between ~5.3-5.5 Cr (1)

Inaccurate. In Andhra, Panchadara is the commonly used word for sugar, not Chekkera.

Now they are making shows to break down Indian family culture. They are saying that 82 percent of Indian wives face sexual abuse by their husbands. Check the comments, girls are saying all Indian men are rapists. I don't know what to say anymore. No matter how much I post about it, whatever I do, nothing will change. They are calling 82 percent of Indian men rapists, but there is no outrage or boycott of this show.

This is How Natural Fortress look like Iran Ground invasion is not easy