Avraam Jack Dectis

On National Agriculture Day, I joined @USDA @SecRollins to advance a clear goal: restore real food to the American diet and end policies that favor ultra-processed products over farmers.

Grok 4.2 asserts USA gains 27 quadrillion USA dollars over a century if the USA adopts PCT and CTS. Grok’s prediction: x.com/i/grok/share/4… Grok explains CTS: x.com/ADectis/status… Grok explains PCT: x.com/i/grok/share/7… The paper grok used to make its prediction: mfr.osf.io/render?url=htt… The 27 quadrillion USA dollars prediction is unlikely to be correct. This exercise is just to show that an extremely virtuous effect is likely.

UK economic reengineering Grok 4.1 says the UK gains from .25 to .54 QUADRILLION POUNDS over the next century if we adopt PCT and CTS. Three different grok links to verify consistent results. Each have different insights, and I can defend against the stated reservations: x.com/i/grok/share/P… x.com/i/grok/share/R… x.com/i/grok/share/D… PCT is an elegant progressive consumption tax only paid by the top forty percent or so of workers. The bottom sixty percent of workers pay nothing. All other national taxes are abolished. CTS is similar to tariffs but far better. It ignores actual trade and focuses on international capital flows, securitising them in a way that directly buttresses domestic production while disadvantaging imports, all with no cost to the treasury. Both PCT and CTS are defined in the paper in the first comment. Grok used this paper to answer the questions. The surprisingly large effect is the result of small annual gains compounded over a century. The range in estimates is due to a variation in the prediction of the small annual gains. So far all AI have predicted very large virtuous effects from these two simple changes. I encourage the reader to try their own AI or an open minded economist. The main point of this post is to emphasize that all estimates suggest a great positive effect. Precise predictions are impossible with chaotic systems, like economies. The important takeaway, besides the value of these two changes, is that we should conduct our affairs in a manner that optimizes GDP growth, because it has very beneficial long term effects. It is quite possible that our economy would be much larger if these two changes were made decades ago. ( On an unrelated but important note, I would like to add that even though I basically just sit around reading and trying to think of ways to make the world better, I was, surprisingly, secretly slandered by a USA stalk racket and those they paid well for the slander. The stalk racket has been following and poisoning me for over 28 years, with the full knowledge of the government and police, who feign ignorance, ignore complaints and arrest nobody. Is this the freedom and liberty so loudly advertised? The refusal of my government to do its job is infuriating. )

UK economic reengineering Grok 4.1 says the UK gains from .25 to .54 QUADRILLION POUNDS over the next century if we adopt PCT and CTS. Three different grok links to verify consistent results. Each have different insights, and I can defend against the stated reservations: x.com/i/grok/share/P… x.com/i/grok/share/R… x.com/i/grok/share/D… PCT is an elegant progressive consumption tax only paid by the top forty percent or so of workers. The bottom sixty percent of workers pay nothing. All other national taxes are abolished. CTS is similar to tariffs but far better. It ignores actual trade and focuses on international capital flows, securitising them in a way that directly buttresses domestic production while disadvantaging imports, all with no cost to the treasury. Both PCT and CTS are defined in the paper in the first comment. Grok used this paper to answer the questions. The surprisingly large effect is the result of small annual gains compounded over a century. The range in estimates is due to a variation in the prediction of the small annual gains. So far all AI have predicted very large virtuous effects from these two simple changes. I encourage the reader to try their own AI or an open minded economist. The main point of this post is to emphasize that all estimates suggest a great positive effect. Precise predictions are impossible with chaotic systems, like economies. The important takeaway, besides the value of these two changes, is that we should conduct our affairs in a manner that optimizes GDP growth, because it has very beneficial long term effects. It is quite possible that our economy would be much larger if these two changes were made decades ago. ( On an unrelated but important note, I would like to add that even though I basically just sit around reading and trying to think of ways to make the world better, I was, surprisingly, secretly slandered by a USA stalk racket and those they paid well for the slander. The stalk racket has been following and poisoning me for over 28 years, with the full knowledge of the government and police, who feign ignorance, ignore complaints and arrest nobody. Is this the freedom and liberty so loudly advertised? The refusal of my government to do its job is infuriating. )

Grok 4.2 says: USA gains 17 to 20 quadrillion USA dollars GDP, over a century, if PCT and CTS are implemented. PCT implies the all national taxes are abolished and only an elegant progressive consumption tax is substituted. The bottom 60% of workers pay nothing and only the top 40% of workers pay on the excess over the bottom 60%, when they decide to consume. This means no worker pays any tax on the first roughly 65k to 80k income. CTS leverages international capital flows to advantage domestic industry. Grok analysis 1 — x.com/i/grok/share/3… Grok analysis 2 — x.com/i/grok/share/9… Grok explains CTS: x.com/ADectis/status… Grok explains PCT: x.com/ADectis/status… Paper grok used for definitions and arguments: mfr.osf.io/render?url=htt…

Grok 4.2 says: USA gains 17 to 20 quadrillion USA dollars GDP, over a century, if PCT and CTS are implemented. PCT implies the all national taxes are abolished and only an elegant progressive consumption tax is substituted. The bottom 60% of workers pay nothing and only the top 40% of workers pay on the excess over the bottom 60%, when they decide to consume. This means no worker pays any tax on the first roughly 65k to 80k income. CTS leverages international capital flows to advantage domestic industry. Grok analysis 1 — x.com/i/grok/share/3… Grok analysis 2 — x.com/i/grok/share/9… Grok explains CTS: x.com/ADectis/status… Grok explains PCT: x.com/ADectis/status… Paper grok used for definitions and arguments: mfr.osf.io/render?url=htt…