Massinference

@CryptoMikli People will want other people involved for accountability reasons. AI will help people and scale existing workforces but not replace workers, especially in places where stakes are high.

Andrew Yang explains why lawyers will be replaced by AI “The first thing that jumped into my mind when you said that was lawyer. Law school applications, last I checked, went up 21% last year, and I would suggest that was a flight to safety, and that stuff’s not safe at all. Lawyering is highly structured. It’s very process oriented. It’s kind of the ideal environment for AI” “I have friends who are partners in law firms who say, ‘Look, I’m giving AI work that would have taken a second or third year associate a week to complete, and it gives it back to me in 20 minutes. So why on earth would I hire a small army of these associates?’”

@DataRepublican This analogy doesn’t make sense

Ok, I'm apparently not good at writing parables, because nearly everyone interpreted it wrong. I used a parable because I want to respect others' service records, especially when not all the facts are out yet. So let's pivot to a much more direct analogy. In 2016, career intelligence professionals, people who had genuinely spent their lives fighting America's enemies, became convinced that a foreign power had compromised the incoming president. They had data points. Real ones. Trump had business dealings in Moscow. He said nice things about Putin on camera. People in his orbit had meetings with Russian nationals. A dossier appeared with salacious claims. Each data point individually was... a data point. But they were looking for Russia. So they found Russia. Everywhere. They were so certain they were right that they leaked to the press. They used classification authority to spy on American citizens. They presented unverified opposition research to a FISA court as intelligence. Peter Strzok texted about "insurance policies." Andrew McCabe authorized leaks. They were experienced professionals who genuinely believed the republic was in danger. Their service records were real. Their concern was sincere. And they were wrong.

@KobeissiLetter In the USA?

BREAKING: Jeff Bezos is in talks to raise $100 billion for a new fund that would buy manufacturing companies and use AI to automate them, per WSJ.

@chiproytx How

As Attorney General - my mission will be to ensure criminals are in jail and that the march of Islam is halted and reversed.

@mattforney This is a dumb poll.

Hate to say it bros, but I don't think Vance is gonna be the 2028 nominee. It'll take the polls a few months to catch up at least. Kamala Harris is going to stomp her pasty white competition. Either way, the future is bright for another ten years of Republican dominance.

@DavidGerig5 @TRHLofficial God is not bound by His sacraments and can choose to save individuals through extraordinary means known only to Him

@TRHLofficial Can one come to salvation out side of the receiving the sacraments from the Holy Catholic Church of Rome? What does the Holy Catholic Church of Rome teach about this?

Being hated by the world is our birthright. John 15. We take no shit. Whoever thought it would be a good idea to try to segregate the Catholics into good and evil, based on vibes, should be fired from the group chat. You have no power here. What a self destructive decision.

@BlakeSNeff They are abused by criminals to run short term rental scams.

Anti-eviction laws are a tax paid by everyone responsible and productive in society to its most irresponsible and parasitic. Where it's easy to kick out people who don't pay rent, rents for everyone are lower.

@DialedIn6 @VigilantFox @somethingx2xsay Are people asking for everything?

@VigilantFox @somethingx2xsay You Disclosuretards are really something. Federal law enforcement never has, and never will be in the business of telling you every detail of their work. That doesn't insinuate or mean anything, dumbfucks.

Tucker Carlson asked Joe Kent why the Thomas Crooks surveillance tapes haven’t been released. Kent’s answer blew him away. He explained the government deliberately withholds information to create noise with conspiracy theories, so the “actual question never gets answered.” TUCKER: “The current president was the subject of a near-successful assassination attempt.” “And we’re just not going to look into very obviously or divulge information that everyone knows they have.” “For example, the surveillance tape from the shooting range at which Thomas Crooks trained, because it would answer the question, was he training with somebody?” “And if so, who? They have that footage, and they won’t release it. What could possibly be the explanation for that?” KENT: “I know what the result is. The result is people come to their own conclusions. And this is where crazy conspiracy theories come from.” “And then those conspiracy theories usually are easy to ‘debunk’ or make the people saying them sound crazy. So then the actual question never gets answered.” [Tucker laughs in awe] TUCKER: “Sorry. Can you say that for people who haven’t lived in Washington?” “I try to explain this to people all the time because this has been ongoing since at least the Kennedy assassination.” “But this is a very serious and recurring thing. It’s a tactic. And you just explained it better than anyone I’ve ever heard. Can you just do that again?” KENT: “So basically, you give no information whatsoever on something that’s obvious, that there should be information.” “You outlined there’s potentially footage of Crooks at the shooting range. Again, police, 101, go get the tapes. Let’s figure it out.” “If you don’t want to address that question, then you just go silent. You say, ‘you can’t ask that question,’ which then creates people who come out of kind of nowhere, and they start drawing their own conclusions.” “Knowing the way the internet works, half of them, if not more, are probably going to be so far off in left field... that then you can just be like, Oh, these people asking these questions about that tape at the video range. Crazy conspiracy theorists.’” “And so then you’ve just diverted all attention away from the thing that you’re trying to conceal. And now everyone’s focused on the crazies.” TUCKER: “Man.” KENT: “And then the second someone asks a legitimate question, they’re ‘crazy.’”

@restoreorderusa Why are you pivoting this to Candace?

Your friend Candace Owens explicitly said she doesn’t care what happens in the midterms. Have you taken issue with that? Or are you only selectively concerned with these things?

@BreannaMorello What do they do? Make Discord chats to egg people on?

🚨ICYMI🚨 FBI Director Kash Patel stated that the number of online undercover agents has increased under his leadership. WATCH!

@pennyfleamarket @Rep_Davidson Do they?

@massinference @Rep_Davidson Currently the government has a monopoly on legally murdering citizens.

The FBI just acknowledged that the federal government buys Americans' location data in its testimony to the Senate Select Subcommittee on Intelligence. This is a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment and is why I introduced the Government Surveillance Reform Act - to close the data broker loophole that allows intelligence agencies to buy Americans' private data.

@Michael7ucci @balajis When was the last time the government correctly handled a highly complex situation? Why do you think the USA selected this war when they have explicitly stated they didn't, Israel did?

@balajis I take it you believe you have thought of these concerns and yet no one in USG has. And that you understand this war better than anyone in the Pentagon. Otherwise you wouldn’t project and predict with such certainty so far out of your domain area, correct?

I'm going to make some obvious points. (1) Blowing up all the oil infrastructure in the Middle East is an insane idea, and may well result in a global economic crash and humanitarian crisis unrivaled in the lives of those now living. We're talking about the price of everything everywhere rising, from food to gas, at a moment when inflation was already high. All of that will be laid at the feet of the authors of this war. (2) The antebellum status quo of Feb 27, 2026 was just not that bad, but we're unlikely to return to it. Expect indefinite, long-term, ongoing disruptions to everything out of the Middle East. (3) Also assume tech financing crashes for the indefinite future. The genius plan to get the Gulf states caught in the crossfire has incinerated much of the funding for LPs, for datacenters, and for IPOs. Anyone in tech who supported this war may soon learn the meaning of "force majeure" as funding gets yanked. (4) Many capital allocators will instead be allocating much further down Maslow's hierarchy of needs, towards useful basic things like food and energy. (5) It's fortunate that all those progressives yelled about the "climate crisis." Yes, their reasoning about timelines was wrong, and much of the money was wasted in graft, but the result was right: we all need energy independence from the Middle East, pronto. It's also fortunate that Elon and China autistically took climate seriously. Now they're going to need to ship a billion solar panels, electric vehicles, batteries, nuclear power plants, and the like to get everyone off oil, immediately. (6) It's not just an oil and gas problem, of course. It's also a fertilizer problem, and a chemical precursor problem. Maybe some new sources will come online at the new prices, but it takes time to dial stuff up, particularly at this scale, so shortages are almost a certainty. That said, China has actually scaled up coal-to-chemicals[a,c] (C2C), and there's also something more sci-fi called Power-to-X[b] which turns arbitrary power + water + air into hydrocarbons. But all of that will need to get accelerated. I have a background in chemical engineering so may start funding things in this area. (7) Ultimately, this war is going to result in tremendous blame for anyone associated with it. It's a no-win scenario to blow up this much infrastructure for so many people. Simply not worth it for whatever objective they thought they were going to attain. But unless you're actually in a position to stop the madness, the pragmatic thing to do is: scramble to mitigate the fallout to yourself, your business, and your people. [a]: reuters.com/business/energ… [b]: alfalaval.com/industries/ene… [c]: reuters.com/sustainability…

@AAGDhillon @TheJusticeDept @NEWSMAX No, you will tolerate it. Because there will be no possible way to enforce anything.

The review of 50–60 million voter records has revealed there are thousands of ineligible and outdated registrations—including non-citizens. Some of them voted. More to come! That is what happens when strong voter ID safeguards are absent—and @TheJusticeDept will not tolerate it.

@plzbepatient If all others that have committed the same crime before him are prosecuted first, sure. But if it's just him then no.

I am not saying I believe it, but if Joe Kent was leaking classified info, and they can actually back it up, should he not be prosecuted because of politics? Just want to make sure I understand if we are actually playing the real game or the fake game.

@Ratmansf49 @Nova_NJ27 @megynkelly The point is that prosecution is used selectively to target certain profiles of people. Selective prosecution is punishment not justice.

@Nova_NJ27 @massinference @megynkelly I’m not sure what he’s saying? I’m sure lots of people have gotten away with doing wrong. It doesn’t mean we don’t continue to point it out.

You wanna rip the GOP apart right to its core and prevent a single America First voter from participating in the midterms? Indict Joe Kent and Tucker Carlson. See how that works out.

@ElectionWiz I heard this is Joe Kent

Sorry, but I don't care about 'anon sources' whispering about any supposed FBI leak probe. The Swamp has lied to us so many times I’ve lost count. Show me the indictment. Bring the evidence. Prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in open court… or kindly shut up.

@JohnCornyn @KenPaxtonTX Why do you want to continue working?

Apparently not the primary election voters who helped me beat @KenPaxtonTX on March 3. We’ll do it again on May 26th.

@TomBuck @GregAbbott_TX My property tax and insurance is 1.5x my mortgage

It’s finally reached the point where my property taxes combined with my home owners insurance is nearly the same as my monthly mortgage payment. @GregAbbott_TX, something has got to change.

@Nova_NJ27 @Ratmansf49 @megynkelly Huh?

@massinference @Ratmansf49 @megynkelly You want that to be the case?