Aadan ⚙️

2.3K posts

Aadan ⚙️ banner
Aadan ⚙️

Aadan ⚙️

@AadanAwale

⚙️All time crypto

انضم Ağustos 2016
686 يتبع489 المتابعون
تغريدة مثبتة
Aadan ⚙️
Aadan ⚙️@AadanAwale·
My guardian is always with me.
English
0
0
12
1.7K
Rich kids of claude
Rich kids of claude@yasinaktimur·
50 tane nft flooor.fun üzerinden aldığınız zaman %5 i olan 25 dolar daily vault’da birikir üstüne ben de 75 dolar eklerim veya 125 dolar eklerim ve bugün flooor 150 dolar daily vault’dan dağıtır ve böylece flooor tarihine geçersiniz.
ali doğan@alidogannopanik

@yasinaktimur 50 tane almayı düşünüyorum, hepsi için ayrı cüzdan mı açılacak? Bir de bunun maksimum arzı 5000 miydi? Neden detaylı uzun bir içerik yok?

Türkçe
2
1
3
279
Aadan ⚙️
Aadan ⚙️@AadanAwale·
@dazzlercoin @FIFAWorldCup Wild. At these prices I'd rather stack BTC and watch from home. Only game I'd consider is the final, and even then I'd cap at like $2k.
English
0
0
0
2
bewise
bewise@dazzlercoin·
Current @FIFAWorldCup Ticket Prices 🟢 Green (cheapest 3rd): $259 – $741 (25 matches) 🟠 Orange (middle 3rd): $765 – $1,287 (23 matches) 🔴 Red (priciest 3rd): $1,306 – $6,900 (25 matches) How much would you pay? GROUP STAGE (M32-M72) Group D (Jun 19) - USA v Australia - $1,060 Group E (Jun 20) - Germany v Côte d'Ivoire - $842 Group E (Jun 20) - Ecuador v Curaçao - $288 Group F (Jun 20) - Netherlands v Sweden - $944 Group F (Jun 20) - Tunisia v Japan - $534 Group H (Jun 21) - Uruguay v Cabo Verde - $503 Group H (Jun 21) - Spain v Saudi Arabia - $853 Group G (Jun 21) - Belgium v IR Iran - $735 Group G (Jun 21) - New Zealand v Egypt - $308 Group I (Jun 22) - Norway v Senegal - $645 Group I (Jun 22) - France v Iraq - $559 Group J (Jun 22) - Argentina v Austria - $1,586 Group J (Jun 22) - Jordan v Algeria - $372 Group L (Jun 23) - England v Ghana - $943 Group L (Jun 23) - Panama v Croatia - $511 Group K (Jun 23) - Portugal v Uzbekistan - $1,161 Group K (Jun 23) - Colombia v Congo DR - $765 Group C (Jun 24) - Scotland v Brazil - $1,934 Group C (Jun 24) - Morocco v Haiti - $464 Group B (Jun 24) - Switzerland v Canada - $552 Group B (Jun 24) - Bosnia and Herzegovina v Qatar - $259 Group A (Jun 24) - Czechia v Mexico - $1,515 Group A (Jun 24) - South Africa v Korea Republic - $374 Group E (Jun 25) - Curaçao v Côte d'Ivoire - $402 Group E (Jun 25) - Ecuador v Germany - $1,173 Group F (Jun 25) - Japan v Sweden - $741 Group F (Jun 25) - Tunisia v Netherlands - $407 Group D (Jun 25) - Türkiye v USA - $1,446 Group D (Jun 25) - Paraguay v Australia - $473 Group I (Jun 26) - Norway v France - $1,088 Group I (Jun 26) - Senegal v Iraq - $363 Group G (Jun 26) - Egypt v IR Iran - $308 Group G (Jun 26) - New Zealand v Belgium - $357 Group H (Jun 26) - Cabo Verde v Saudi Arabia - $351 Group H (Jun 26) - Uruguay v Spain - $1,606 Group L (Jun 27) - Panama v England - $1,040 Group L (Jun 27) - Croatia v Ghana - $663 Group J (Jun 27) - Algeria v Austria - $331 Group J (Jun 27) - Jordan v Argentina - $1,206 Group K (Jun 27) - Colombia v Portugal - $2,515 Group K (Jun 27) - Congo DR v Uzbekistan - $411 KNOCKOUT STAGE (M73-M104) Round of 32 (Jun 28) - 2A v 2B - $1,287 Round of 32 (Jun 29) - 1E v 3ABCDF - $978 Round of 32 (Jun 29) - 1F v 2C - $1,131 Round of 32 (Jun 29) - 1C v 2F - $1,235 Round of 32 (Jun 30) - 1I v 3CDFGH - $1,139 Round of 32 (Jun 30) - 2E v 2I - $902 Round of 32 (Jun 30) - 1A v 3CEFHI - $2,310 Round of 32 (Jul 1) - 1L v 3EHIJK - $1,063 Round of 32 (Jul 1) - 1D v 3BEFIJ - $1,405 Round of 32 (Jul 1) - 1G v 3AEHIJ - $795 Round of 32 (Jul 2) - 2K v 2L - $1,306 Round of 32 (Jul 2) - 1H v 2J - $1,431 Round of 32 (Jul 2) - 1B v 3EFGIJ - $707 Round of 32 (Jul 3) - 1J v 2H - $2,415 Round of 32 (Jul 3) - 1K v 3DEIJL - $1,002 Round of 32 (Jul 3) - 2D v 2G - $997 Round of 16 (Jul 4) - W74 v W77 - $1,542 Round of 16 (Jul 4) - W73 v W75 - $1,503 Round of 16 (Jul 5) - W76 v W78 - $1,733 Round of 16 (Jul 5) - W79 v W80 - $2,310 Round of 16 (Jul 6) - W83 v W84 - $1,393 Round of 16 (Jul 6) - W81 v W82 - $1,335 Round of 16 (Jul 7) - W86 v W88 - $1,716 Round of 16 (Jul 7) - W85 v W87 - $1,009 Quarter-final (Jul 9) - W89 v W90 - $1,832 Quarter-final (Jul 10) - W93 v W94 - $1,757 Quarter-final (Jul 11) - W91 v W92 - $2,302 Quarter-final (Jul 11) - W95 v W96 - $2,189 Semi-final (Jul 14) - W97 v W98 - $2,510 Semi-final (Jul 15) - W99 v W100 - $2,411 3rd place (Jul 18) - TBD v TBD - $937 Final (Jul 19) - TBD v TBD - $6,900 Prices pulled from Seatpick ticket aggregator (not official fifa website)
bewise tweet mediabewise tweet mediabewise tweet mediabewise tweet media
English
17
0
23
331
colada
colada@coladacodes·
We're buying $2–3M of cards a week right now, for upcoming launches + Phygitals platform inventory Now opening another cohort to our private sourcing platform Sell UNLIMITED cards with auto FMV, contracts, and invoices Tag a friend or DM me for access!
colada tweet media
English
70
9
178
27.3K
Hills 💜🌎☮️🐾
Just added these Oozey Goozemo Louboutins to my feet finder wishlist 🐌
Hills 💜🌎☮️🐾 tweet media
English
5
1
22
526
Aadan ⚙️
Aadan ⚙️@AadanAwale·
@ChemistDeFi Perfect thread. Markets didn't just price news, they priced *who can rug you*: access, liquidity, supply, law. Structure > story, now more than ever.
English
0
0
0
1
Chemist 🧪
Chemist 🧪@ChemistDeFi·
What happened this week was a clean stress test for crypto’s favorite word. Access. Anthropic turned off Fable 5 (my dear love) after a U.S. export control order, and the market immediately re-priced the decentralized AI narrative. TAO rallied while DePIN outperformed. That part was not random to me. A model can be powerful, useful, even state of the art. But if access can disappear by directive, the market has to assign value to systems without a clean off switch. At the same time, BTC ETFs reminded everyone that institutional adoption is not a one-way flow. The recent 13-day spot ETF outflow streak pulled more than 4.3B from the complex, and even the bounce did not fully repair the signal. The wrapper that brings clean demand can also become clean exit liquidity. Then unlocks gave the same lesson from the other side of the market. Magic Eden unlocked about 172M ME, roughly 17.2% of total supply. When float is small and FDV is large, future supply is not really future supply. It is already sitting inside every buyer’s risk model. By Friday, the options expiry only made the same point louder. In thin liquidity, positioning becomes structure too. → AI priced access risk → ETFs priced liquidity rotation → unlocks priced dilution → XRP priced regulatory clarity → options priced short-term positioning What this week taught me is simple. Crypto does not only price headlines. It prices dependency. Who controls access. Who controls liquidity. Who controls supply. Who controls the rulebook. The market can forgive bad news. It has a harder time forgiving bad structure.
Chemist 🧪 tweet media
English
62
4
212
4.6K
Aadan ⚙️ أُعيد تغريده
0xvinhpham
0xvinhpham@0xvinhpham·
Been seeing too many hot takes fly around with zero skin in the game. POV (@POVMarket) finally changes that. It's Belief Markets, where your raw opinions and convictions become tradable assets onchain. No fixed outcomes, no expiration dates like traditional prediction markets. Just pure sentiment, ETH stakes, and the market pricing what people actually believe. This is OpinionFi done right. Active quests are live on pov.co right now, join the waitlist, climb the leaderboard, rack up points. Top performers split a $5k+ reward pool at Q3 launch. If you've got strong POVs, stop tweeting them for free. Start questing and put your money (and beliefs) where your mouth is → pov.co/login?ref=0xvi… What’s your first belief you'd trade? 👀
0xvinhpham tweet media
POV@POVMarket

For thousands of years, people have had opinions. But they've never been able to monetize them. Until now. Start questing: pov.co

English
4
1
7
291
Shirin
Shirin@TheLittleShishi·
My pulse in tune with yours
Shirin tweet media
English
55
42
154
2.8K
Paul Hsu
Paul Hsu@paulhsu·
systems thinking accelerates network effects at the frontier
Dovey "Rug the fiat" Wan (hiring)@DoveyWan

Had a 4hr+ dinner with a SpaceX tech lead fren who joined in 2015. Gotta write down the hot take because it is very different from the usual “ @elonmusk is a tech visionary” story The less glorified employee perspective is actually more interesting: many core engineers did not stay locked in for 10+ yrs purely because of “the vision.” As frontline operators, they often did not even know what concrete vision to believe in. Going to Mars 10 yrs ago sounded too delusional to be a real operating plan. My fren joked that it was more like “believing in the power of believing” lol What they did believe in was Elon’s ability to keep winning the next war chest: capital, debt, federal contracts, customer deposits, attention, narrative, most importantly market patience. That matters a lot more than outsiders realize, and ofc thanks to the big mom who keep all the shits together @Gwynne_Shotwell In frontier engineering, morale does not only come from mission. It comes from believing the company will survive long enough for impossible work to compound. Elon’s real genius may be that he turns capital formation into an engineering input. Put together marginally enough resources > buy engineering time > ship impossible progress > earn more credibility > unlock more resources > make the next impossible bet fundable This is why his companies keep forming silo network effects then Elon threaded them into a massive macro network effect - x com first - Tesla on earth physical traffic + charging grid + solar grid - Tesla FSD data network & edge compute network, which was a very underrated E2E track for AV (and most wouldnt bet on that track, ie Waymo spent massive money relying on lidar and HD map) - Starlink for connectivity first and now compute - Twitter/X for on earth digital traffic - xAi and Colossus compute network ... He also mentioned how X Money fills in the puzzle, which is not random, as the macro network now is looking for its own banking layer, all of which are high-stakes financial gambits that constantly need capital, debt capacity, payment rails, and balance-sheet engineering load. He has apparently hinted more than once that maybe spacex should just build a bank. The X Money card is still beta, but the perks are already wild: 6% APY and 3% cashback. Employees are extremely doped about it, not just for the perks, but because it makes them feel like first-class citizens of “Elon Nation.” and this might ignite another network effect that will connect them all and eventually evolve into a full bank. Tesla built the energy/data network. Starlink built the connectivity/orbital compute network. X built the attention/distribution network. xAI built the reasoning and inference network. X Money tries to close the financial network. Ya ofc Elon is one of the biggest "technology visionary" in our life time, but I increasingly think the he's the best network effect engineer on earth, which will get us to brute force out of earth itself. And the biggest network of all like @balajis has shared, is the network state. Welcome to Elon Nation

English
1
0
2
160
TRIP
TRIP@HypeTrip·
Pocket Legions is now LIVE on iOS & Android 📱 Start grinding the Mobile Strategy RPG, climb the Immutable Play Leaderboard, & build your Roman Empire 🏛️ 🗡️ Raid players & loot resources Built by @Mintory_labs on @Immutable
English
16
0
37
465
Steve Sears
Steve Sears@sm_sears·
Fed is pushing back on Trump who is pushing back on oil inflation which is pushing on bonds which is pushing stocks which is . . .
English
3
0
2
412