GB

@ScottJenningsKY What do you twats have planned? More inflation? Quagmire in Iran? Tax cuts for the wealthy?

What do Dems have planned if they win the Midterm Elections? Lower your taxes? Make America safer? Energy security? No, none of that. They will wage "maximum warfare" on Republicans & impeach President Trump on DAY ONE. This is not an election to "sit out."

@SaltyGoat17 Any day now. ……. LOL

“Absolutely. I am never letting this go. They tried to rig an entire election system, we’re going to be making arrests. It’s coming soon. I promise you it’s coming soon.” - Kash Patel on the 2020 election fraud He's gonna blow all of this out of the water!!

@BoLoudon LOL, you lying troll

Estimated net worths before entering the presidency and after leaving: TRUMP (2016–2021): $4.5B → $2.4B OBAMA (2009–2017): $1.3M → $68.7M W. BUSH (2001–2009): $20M → $40M CLINTON (1993–2001): $1.3M → $120M TRUMP is the only one to lose money.🇺🇸

@bennyjohnson VT has one district. RI has only two. How the fuck do you gerrymander those states? Oh and Mass’ map was signed into by a Republican governor.

Republican voters make up 40% of New England. Democrats control the district lines. Result: 🔴 — 0 🔵 — 27

@treasure_book1 @atrupar Only a cultist would defend a President who stated something that fails basic math.

@atrupar Only a pedant would stare at a 98% discount and complain that the guy who secured it didn't use the correct label for the miracle.

RFK Jr: "A Democratic senator claimed it's mathematically impossible to have a drug drop by 600%. I said, 'Well, if the drug was $100 and it raises to $600, that would be a 600% rise. If it drops from $600 to $100, that's a 600% savings.'" Trump: "Right"

@NS_Neelotpal @atrupar LOL holy fucking shit

@marcg1640 @marcorandazza LOL so when Trump claims “people” tell him this and that, because those people are anonymous we can then say Trump is not credible? Just want to see how far you take this.

@BiegGreg @marcorandazza Nothing says credible like anonymous sources.

I have seen shockingly stupid defamation claims by public figures who don't seem to have ever heard of NYT v. Sullivan. This one is not "shockingly stupid." It is still not the best, and I hate how the suit begins essentially with his resume. But it has some potential for some of it to get past the actual malice standard, depending on how the facts shake out. BUT, there is a 0% chance that he gets a fair trial in that district. He's most likely gonna pull a judge that won't let him win, and even if he pulls a judge who can keep their integrity intact, he won't ever find a jury in that town that has the slightest shred of integrity. All in all, this was stupid. Would have been better to spend the money on a PR agency and to mock the reporter. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

@cdnguyincognito @PinkShirtMigo @atrupar @grok LOL, are you listening to yourself? It’s not hard to speak correctly when it comes to math and percentages. BUt because you guys are incapable of criticizing Trump, we have to change how percentages work. LOL I just can’t.

@PinkShirtMigo @atrupar @grok Everyone knows what he meant except for those who would argue that water is not wet if Trump said it was.

@rubencristiano9 @atrupar Hahahaha, holy shit are you that far up Trump’s ass that you are now going to rewrite how percentages work?

@atrupar It actually makes much more sense to mention percentages in the positive frame all the time to keep them standardized and thus easily comparable. Hopefully more people start adopting Trump's way

@atrupar Holy fuck

@chriswithans @EJColMill It does when you realize people who won’t vote for the GOP or Trump also don’t want gerrymandering.

@EJColMill Doesn’t sound like a “danger zone” then does it

Does this seriously make sense to you? Do you seriously, legitimately believe that the current president is actually at -17 net approval with the entire Registered Voter Electorate of the United States of America when Virginia just had a highly consequential election that was 3 points to the right of 2024? Really?

@chriswithans Yes. Why are MAGAs so obtuse?

@marcg1640 @marcorandazza YEs because Kash Patel is soooooo credible. And his attorney has a history of these defamation cases that eventually get pulled or tossed in court.

@BiegGreg @marcorandazza It is highly doubtful that The Atlantic will let truth be the ultimate defense. If it was a truthful story... Consider the source.

@ScottWalker LOL gerrymandering was good when you were all cheering on Texas. So STFU. Also, what party has blocked gerrymandering laws in Congress?

Translation: gerrymandering is bad, unless it favors Democrats. Then it’s good.

@MadAndy44 @MichelleGr96913 @WcoastO @RapAbout @GigaBeers LOL nothing better when these MAGAs make a claim, tell you to google it when asked for proof and then block you. I am soooooo convinced that she was telling the truth now.

@MichelleGr96913 @BiegGreg @WcoastO @RapAbout @GigaBeers I did, it all says you're full of shit. But thanks for the typical MAGA response when they have NOTHING to back up their nonsense.

HUGE WIN for fair elections and the rule of law in Virginia! The Virginia court just ruled the Democrat power grab to rig congressional redistricting UNCONSTITUTIONAL! Thank you to the brave judge who stood up and said: No to mid-decade gerrymandering, No to bypassing the people and No to changing the rules after the game has started. The voters spoke, but the Constitution spoke louder. Virginia’s maps stay fair. Democracy is protected. This is what real checks and balances look like. God bless the Virginia court! 🇺🇸 Do you support the Court’s ruling?

@MichelleGr96913 @WcoastO @RapAbout @GigaBeers Share with us those “facts”

@WcoastO @RapAbout @GigaBeers If you look at the country as a whole, more states underrepresent Republicans because of the democrats gerrymandering. Facts and truth are stronger then your wokeness.

@MichelleGr96913 @RapAbout @GigaBeers LOL did you feel this way about Texas? Or what about Oklahoma where there are zero Dem representatives despite nearly 30% of the voting population being Democrats? You concerned about their lack of representation?

@RapAbout @GigaBeers Anyone who thinks 49% of the people dont deserve representation is a dictator. Turns out thw democrats are the Kings, not Trump.

@JackDangerLIVE LOL, this judge is a GOP judge from a rural county who tried to stop the vote altogether but had his ruling stayed by the state Supreme Court. This ruling will likely also get stayed while a suit already with the VA SC is heard.

🚨 BOOM. CONSTITUTION JUST DROPPED THE HAMMER IN VIRGINIA. Tazewell Circuit Court ruled the April 21 redistricting referendum UNCONSTITUTIONAL — void from the start. Injunction locked in. Certification BLOCKED. Democrats’ mid-decade power grab? DENIED. No shady new maps. No 10-1 flip. The rule of law just body-slammed the process. This fight’s rocketing to the Virginia Supreme Court… but tonight? We hold the line. Ken Cuccinelli called it. The people’s vote got protected by the courts. America First means Constitution First. 🔥⚖️🛡️ RT if you’re done with the games. #Virginia #RuleOfLaw #NoPowerGrabs

@atrupar The number of MAGAs here making themselves look stupid to cover for Trump’s stupidity is really hilarious……. And depressing.

RFK Jr: "President Trump has a different way of calculating percentages. If you have a $600 drug and you reduce it to $10, that's a 600% reduction."

@LauraLoomer @billmaher LOL OK weirdo

🚨 Statement on Judge Moody’s ruling in my defamation lawsuit against Bill Maher @billmaher 🚨 The ruling today by Judge Moody in favor of Bill Maher following his initial dismissal of Bill Maher’s motion to dismiss my defamation lawsuit is both factually and legally wrong. Maher and HBO defamed me per se by publishing that I “f*cked the president” for simply traveling on an airplane to a Presidential debate and expressing my adoration for President Trump and his MAGA Agenda. The same judge previously denied Maher and HBOs @HBO’s motion to dismiss on this basis. The judge's new premise, which is outrageous, taken from media articles, is that I said I loved the president because he’s a great president, I hugged him and traveled on President Trump’s plane with him and his staff to the Presidential debate in 2024 in a professional capacity and as a journalist. For these reasons, the judge says Maher could make an alleged “joke” that I had f*cked Trump. This was no joke and even if it was, it was legally actionable and has led to continued defamation, threats and misogynistic and unwanted sexual comments to be made towards me. It is also very disrespectful and defamatory of President Trump and @FLOTUS, both of whom I respect greatly. It is beyond the pale for any judge to say that a woman can be accused of having sex with a man and have it be brushed off as “a joke” just because she proclaimed a platonic love for their politics and leadership style. The ruling is totally dishonest and misogynistic. I am a professional woman who simply traveled as a guest to the Presidential debate, and everyone knows Bill Maher was a strong supporter of Kamala Harris and rabidly anti-Trump at the time he made these defamatory comments about me. This wasn’t a joke. He was trying to further the election of Kamala Harris and smear my reputation when I have always been highly professional in my support of President Trump. This judgement should be reversed on appeal either at the Eleventh Circuit and at the Supreme Court if necessary. It’s truly an attack on women and the truth. @FreedomWatchUSA