Correct Question

@captive_dreamer @Timcast “I’m enraged that CANDACE’s exploitation of Kirk’s death for money has nullified MY exploitation of his death for political power”

@megynkelly @SECGov Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is who you want But 100% safe to say that whatever Trump insider is making these trades, the Trump DOJ will not prosecute him It’s probably Trump himself

This must be investigated @SECGov

@Anne_Gee_2923 @wendyp4545 @Siskiyous6 @Pontifex I don’t know if you still consider yourself Catholic, but if you’ll recall: refusal to submit to the Pope’s authority is defined as Schism. Under Canon Law, Schism is a grave offense that results in latae sententiae excommunication.

I was also raised Catholic and feel 100% the same about this faux Pope. My eyes started opening when the Popes and church hierarchy turned a blind eye toward the rampant pedophilia in their ranks, after the public became aware in the 1980’s. But subsequently as I learned more, I realized that there have been many popes throughout history who were truly very evil and un-pope like and of course that has mostly been hidden from the faithful or at least downplayed. The Church is an organization of humans here on earth and not immune from being infiltrated by evil entities. Is there anything more true and pure than maintaining a direct relationship to God the Father, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit? No middlemen needed.

I'm Wendy nobody. Born and Raised Catholic. Lover of Jesus Christ. Believer in the Trinity. I proclaim that this is not a Pope therefore he is not my Pope. He is a Chicago Politician who has the Title Pope. The Bible warned us about men like him. @Pontifex

@wendyp4545 @Pontifex FUN FACT: refusal to submit to the Pope’s authority as the head of the Catholic Church is defined as Schism. Under Canon Law (the legal system of the Church), Schism is a grave offense that results in latae sententiae (automatic) excommunication.

@ginamilan_ @DissentFu The Zuck giveth, and the Zuck taketh away. Blessed be the name of the Zuck?

@DissentFu You have to hire 8k people in order to let them go… So yes you fucking retard.

Billionaires create jobs though right?

@catturd2 Anyone who criticizes Trump — especially those who call Trump “commie scum” — are vulnerable to the unhinged/J6 types. I understand Tucker, Candace, Megyn, etc are also getting threats.

I’ve been getting crazy death treats lately - and someone tried to intimidate me at my house and threaten me yesterday. I’m going to post who this is soon, and I promise you, Florida is a stand your ground state. I’m armed to the teeth, I’m not playing, and come at me at your own risk..

@MHerskovitz How do you determine how much to “charge” a particular company for its use of AI? And how could you ever extract enough to pay every person who was laid off bc of AI?

AI will NOT fund UBI. Millions of firings will destroy consumer spending and cause a recession, so companies who cut costs with AI will find fewer customers. And the govt is already so deep in debt it won’t be able to support those who lost jobs. Even if UBI were possible, are we to assume everyone gets the same? Is that the meritocracy our conservative leaders promised? Talent, experience, drive will mean nothing? Sounds more like a socialist dystopia than free enterprise. Knowingly or not Yang is calling for a rebirth of Feudalism. Nope.

@Laurie0801 People who are against universal healthcare are people who think they personally will be paying for someone else’s healthcare (& they picture someone undeserving/lazy/illegal/etc) What they DON’T realize is how much more they are now paying to have for-profit private insurance

Why are Americans so against universal healthcare?

@ginamilan_ “Trump needs to finish the job” At least, for once, you’ve acknowledged that Trump HAS NOT gotten the job done The “I just want someone to shake things up” crowd is starting to realize that as annoying as the world may be, it CAN get worse if you put a buffoon in charge

Indian oil tanker Sanmar Herald pleads with Iranian forces to stop firing in the Strait of Hormuz this morning. Trump needs to finish the job.

@theobjectivist “Each one destroyed old jobs and created new ones that no one could have predicted. AI will do the same” What you miss The Q isn’t whether AI will create new jobs no one can predict. It will. The CORRECT question is: will AI be capable of doing those NEW jobs too? Probably so.

This is the philosophical bankruptcy of a brilliant engineer laid bare in a single post. Musk proposes that the government pay people not to work because machines will do the working for them. This is not a new idea. It is the old idea of something for nothing, repackaged in silicon. Start with the economics. Mises demonstrated that production must precede consumption. You cannot distribute wealth that has not been created by someone. If AI produces the goods, someone still owns the AI, maintains it, directs it, and decides what it produces. That is not a post-work society. That is a society in which the producers have changed tools. The question Musk refuses to ask is: by what right does the government seize the output of those producers to mail checks to those who did not produce it? "There will not be inflation" because production will exceed the money supply increase. This assumes the government will print only enough and never more. This is the assumption of every inflationist in history. Hayek called this the pretense of knowledge. Mises demonstrated that no central authority can calculate economic outcomes for a dynamic economy because it lacks the pricing information that only free markets generate. This is not a technical problem to be solved. It is an impossibility built into the nature of centralized control. Now the moral question Musk avoids entirely. Man survives by using his mind. Work is not a burden to be eliminated. It is the means by which a rational being sustains his life, creates value, and achieves purpose. A man who receives a check for existing is not free. He is a dependent. He has been severed from the process that gives his life meaning. Rand would say Musk is proposing to turn every American into a ward of the state, fed and housed by the productive, with no purpose and no self-respect. Mike Lee asks the right question: why would you trust the government to do this? But the deeper question is: why would you want any institution, government or otherwise, to replace the individual's responsibility for his own survival? That is not compassion. That is the destruction of the human spirit performed with a direct deposit. Musk builds rockets because he refused to accept that space was closed to private enterprise. He should apply that same principle to the economy: trust free individuals to adapt, innovate, and create new forms of value, as they have after every technological revolution in history. The printing press did not create permanent unemployment. Neither did the steam engine, electricity, the automobile, or the internet. Each one destroyed old jobs and created new ones that no one could have predicted. AI will do the same, if the government stays out of the way. Universal High Income is not the future. It is the end of the future, paid for monthly.

@ILUVASHHWRAZ @ginamilan_ I ♥️ how the crowd that refused to acknowledge any context in their outrage over “you didn’t build that” or “you can keep your doctor” are suddenly picking through Trump’s actions with a fine tooth comb to find some contextual excuse for patently abhorrent behavior

@Correct_Q @ginamilan_ Jesus NEVER wore a red stole over His white robe. The artist is picturing Trump as a disciple of Christ ....whom we should all mirror as Jesus gave us the power of The Holy Spirit and to heal.

🚨 NEW: CBS poll shows 58% of Catholics approve of President Trump’s overall job performance. Anyone claiming Trump lost his Catholic base has been proven wrong yet again.

@mattwr @FrankLuntz “Yacht” is just one example. The point is: you can’t give everyone everything all the time for free. Who’s paying for all these robots and robot factories and raw materials to make more robots?

@Correct_Q @FrankLuntz Not everyone wants a yacht.

Question is, what number should that income be?

@Polymarket twitter.com/hormuzletter/s…

BREAKING: Trump claims Iran has agreed to an “unlimited suspension” of its nuclear program.

@ianmiles twitter.com/hormuzletter/s…

This is HUGE if true. Finally, peace in the Middle East will have been achieved.

@maddenifico @Scaramucci Must suck for Trump supporters to realize he’s worse than Obama in almost every way imaginable.

Trump spent years in a jealous rage, relentlessly slamming Barack Obama for unfreezing $1.7 billion of Iran's own money to Iran, calling it pathetic ransom money and proof of a disastrous, weak-kneed surrender. Driven by petty obsession, Trump spitefully ripped up the Iran nuclear deal in 2018, shredding every restraint on Tehran, and smugly promised the world a "better deal." Instead, his childish vendetta supercharged Iran's nuclear program, pushing it dangerously close to the bomb. Now, in a breathtaking display of hypocrisy and failure, Trump is negotiating to hand Iran access to $20 billion in frozen funds — more than ten times what he once condemned — in exchange for the regime surrendering its near-weapons-grade uranium stockpile. This is Trump at his most embarrassingly stupid: destroying a deal that had capped Iran's enrichment and kept it under watch, only to crawl back offering vastly more cash after his own incompetence made the threat far worse. The man who mocked Obama for "giving" Iran money is now dangling a fortune in frozen assets while pretending it's a brilliant victory. It's not leadership — it's ego-driven incompetence and rank hypocrisy, a petty grudge that backfired spectacularly and left America facing a more expensive, more dangerous mess. Trump's jealous tantrum didn't make America safer; it just made the cleanup bill ten times bigger.

Every foreign policy genius who spent a decade collecting paychecks to tell us Iran was untouchable just watched a real estate developer from Queens reopen the waterway that moves a third of the world's oil. The credential class should be embarrassed into silence.

@cturnbull1968 MAGA won’t “explain” this They will claim (incorrectly) that Iran wasn’t afraid of Obama so they were ignoring the deal, but Trumps deal is REAL and they are so scared of him they will abide by the deal so voila! Trumps is better!! 🏆

Really looking forward to MAGA explaining why Trump paying $20B, for Iran to give up their uranium, is somehow better than Obama paying just $1.7B for the same thing. Excluding the thousands of deaths and billions in military costs, naturally.

@blackroomsec I don’t think Elon is interested in creating a utopia I think he’s realizing that if AI puts 300M Americans out of work, there are going to be 300M *really pissed off* people — with lots of time on their hands — looking for revenge against the oligarchs

There is no such thing as a free lunch. At no time, throughout all of recorded history, has there been any society, government, collective, which paid its citizens to do nothing yet reap some sort of reward for it. And in all cases where wealth was redistributed to such extremes as described here those societies utterly failed. Or, if they survived they became complete totalitarian dictatorships. In every case.

5D Chess: It’s a $55 billion war just to go back to the Barack Obama deal. Wait. Pay 21x more than Obama did. Same deal.

@grok … to say the EC provides over-representation by SMALL states, not rural states Rhode Island for ex. is not “rural”, but 1 vote there is almost 3x as powerful (in terms of electoral votes) than 1 vote in Texas So the Q is: why should a Rhode Islander matter more than a Texan?

@robertgraham @grok 1. In a polarized environment, where most states are winner take all, the electoral college means more political power is given to swing states, not rural states, bc those are the ones you must cater to, in order to win (think “ethanol” requirements) 2. It would be more accurate

There is a good civic argument for the "electoral college". Almost all western democracies give more weight to rural voters, for the same reason as the original compromise when ratifying the Constitution. Without some counterbalance, rural areas simply become "colonies" of urban areas, with government serving the interests of urban areas over the wishes of rural areas. In almost all western democracies, the person leading the country is not chosen by a popular vote, but by representatives. Those representatives are in turn chosen primarily as local representatives for individual communities. The electoral college giving more voting power to some is not a violation of democratic principles, but the norm in western liberal democracies.