Dootch

@zimathy @marcy98gc @SideTweetz @CNviolations I don't think all vegans do it for taste. That's why i added that qualifier to both of my responses. "If they are vegan for dietary preferences." I'm only talking about people who simply don't like meat.

@Dootch @marcy98gc @SideTweetz @CNviolations Brother I think veganism isn’t great but you must be pretty braindead if you think people are vegan because they don’t like the taste of meat 💀 they do it for their own morality

I can't believe I'm saying this… but she's right 😭

@TheCatholicEngr And a modern computer can still compute much quicker than those 400k people. Booting my personal computer takes millions to billions of computations

"We went to the moon in 1969 with less computing power" NO WE DIDN'T NASA employed 400,000 people at that time to run the calculations for us The physical machine may have had less RAM than today, but there were still millions of computations taking place With human brains

@VaniIIaextracts @117ChiefMaster Butthurt retard over here ^

@117ChiefMaster The part where she just wanted a different face than juno you retard ass bitch. She also came out after it was revealed saying how much she loves it.

Just straight up fucking lying is crazy The world would genuinely be a better place without these grifting incel sidewalk boogers using up its oxygen Screenshotted cus your ass ain’t getting any Twitter blue pennies from me lmao

@marcy98gc @SideTweetz @CNviolations It is when it comes to food preferences. This isn't tricking a gay man into having sex with a woman, it's eating things you don't otherwise enjoy eating. My family has put mushrooms in my food before, was i annoyed? Yes. Was it a simple, minor inconvenience? Also yes.

@Dootch @SideTweetz @CNviolations No respecting others people’s personal choices is definitely not a minor inconvenience

@theoofcat5 @barneyxbt They also never "create an argument." They simply present a bunch of information they don't fully understand in the forms of questions, then expect the listener to put all the information into one coherent claim. e.g. "Isn't the most optimal path a straight line to the moon?"

@barneyxbt Conspiracy theorists never ever present a logically coherent case. They present facts they’ve interpreted with their beliefs; then argue the fact that they interpreted it in such a way is evidence that their belief is true.

let me get this straight it doesn’t matter how much evidence you present. emails, laws of physics, exposed connections, literal video footagenone of it is enough a conspiracy theorist can lay out a bulletproof case with sources and the npc response is always the same. “where’s your proof” brother i just showed you the proof. you didn’t even look at it nothing is real to these people unless anderson cooper says it on cnn or it gets stamped as “officially confirmed” by the same government that’s been lying to them their entire lives they don’t want proof, they want permission to believe it. and until their favorite news anchor tells them it’s okay to think for themselves they never will the saddest part is they turned the general public into the gatekeepers of their own prison. you don’t even need guards when the inmates police each other for free

@dreadconquest @goducksmendoza @WoocashWombat Resorting to insults and completely disengaging with the disagreement at hand is a common sign of someone who doesn't know how to argue their point. If you're gonna be retarded, at least stand on business.

@Dootch @goducksmendoza @WoocashWombat do you guys share a single brain cell between you

"aha, the capitalist state has a higher score in the capitalism metric"

@SideTweetz @CNviolations If its simply dietary preference, that seems like a bit of an over reaction. Sure its a bit rude, you can call him an ass or whatever, but it really isn't a big deal in any capacity. Big whoop, someone who doesnt enjoy meat ate meat and enjoyed it. Minor inconvenience at most.

@CNviolations Standing there eating ribs while a vegan loses their mind... THAT'S funny. Intentionally tricking someone to eat something against their dietary preference... NOT funny.

@dreadconquest @goducksmendoza @WoocashWombat So the only example you can come up with to prove that NK is better than SK is... higher birthrate and lower suicide. And then you immediately admit that this metric would need to be "spun" to even convince simple people? Maybe your example is actually... dogshit.

@goducksmendoza @WoocashWombat okay well north korea has better birth rates and lower suicide rates than south korea, so if you were sufficiently motivated, you could spin that up into a little tweet to sway the opinions of simple folk- do you understand now?

@mynamehear You must have missed the memo, democrats have already moved onto the "it's happening and here's why it's a good thing" step of their 3-step plan they use to argue against everything.

No transgender person has ever recruited a cisgender kid to become transgender. That's never happened. It's a completely made up talking point. If you believe that, you have a little baby bird brain.

@futureVrking @PlainSightLogic Idk about Below Zero or Subnautica 2, but the first game's VR kinda sucks ass imo. It was a better experience on keyboard, even with the mod (which is better than standard).

@PlainSightLogic Nice choices. Hope to play some of these myself soon

The latest VR is dead post (VR has fallen off) has made me realise that VR has a treasure trove of video games that flatscreen gamers and VR casuals don’t even know exist. Post your top 5 VR games to educate gamers out there. I’ll go first in the comments for this post.

@RedHConservatar @TenthAmendment That's why i called it a disingenuous obfuscation, not an outright lie, which you're doing now. If we have created a law, and the law is upheld by the supreme court (which it has), then the law can be followed and is constitutional. Labelling it unconstitutional is wrong.

@Dootch @TenthAmendment LOL Never said illegal. It's UNCONSTITUTIONAL. So, without the power explicitly stated in the constitution OR explicitly stating WAR can be a delegated power, it's Unconstitutional. The fact that it's a law is meaningless. Courts have violated the constitution many times.

The constitution doesn't say the president can wage a war without approval from congress as long as it's 60 days or less That's made up trash.

@ultidav @slime_machine Since the Islamic Revolution, the IRGC have repeatedly called for "death to America" and have been threatening us for decades. Iran has been funding terrorist organizations in the same time. And we've never committed war crimes against them. Quit siding with terrorists.

@Dootch @slime_machine Probably shouldn’t have committed war crimes against them if we were afraid of them getting mad and nuking us!

all this propagandized media coverage on a single pilot is so disgusting man we bombed a fucking school harder to pretend every american pilot’s life is some precious glass figurine with the immediate dead kids contrast and the purpose of the conflict being so moronic

@Iconguards @slime_machine They are still investigating as far as i know. And they've made it clear that it was not on purpose. I really don't care to wait for an "I'm sorry." Obviously it was a tragedy, but that happens in war.

@Dootch @slime_machine Or its the fact that there was no accountability. Our DoW leader didnt even apologize to the families. War is war, but when you kill civilians a proper leadership shows accountability for the mistake, not doubling down on killing kids.

@the_enrightened It does, it just caters to the worst of society. The dregs and the billionaires.

Do the Americans get how little America offers them at this point?

@realtimsharp Literal retard. No fucking shit, its a war. If we didn't attack first, they would attack first. The IRGC outright says they will. "Lets let Hitler take over Europe because if we join they war, they still start attacking American soldiers 👉👈."

If foreign soldiers landed on the shores of America, would you want to kill them to protect your land? Why wouldn’t the same logic apply to Iran? End the war now.

@lorahmoe Do they look black? Then yeah they're black. Do they look white? Then they're white. Simple as that.

Why do mixed people always claim they black 😂

@PotatoMcWhiskey Arbitrary rules? If art is made to be viewed by the public, the public gets to decide the rules. If 95% percent of the public decide the Art is bad, then we are allowed to criticize it.

@PotatoMcWhiskey I tired of people defending art they dont even like. No one is saying no one should be ALLOWED to make obscene art. But we are able to express how much we think it shouldn't have been made. I can disagree with someone making something while supporting their right to create it.

Its not about liking the art, I fucking hate it, its gross and ugly, the point however is that it IS art and can and should be allowed. We do not need arbitrary rules calling back to when the fucking church and society demanding things look a certain way and conform to a style