The "Scientific Consensus" is a religion

@MTrued @SecchiLuigi @simonmaechling So basically a conflict of interest is a situation where a person’s personal interests, relationships, or financial incentives could interfere with their ability to act fairly or objectively in their professional or official role.

@HasanIQtest @SecchiLuigi @simonmaechling Answer the question.

Anti-science theories have a built-in defense mechanism. Show evidence? “It’s fake.” Show a study? “Big Pharma paid for it.” Show 100 studies? “They bought them all.” The goal isn’t to test a belief. It’s to protect it.

@Yoosha64579993 @supercollider_x wow

@supercollider_x The exact opposite of this is true. Men have TOO MUCH information on how women actually work and that's why they're demoralised.

i think honestly modern society has set up males to not have the slightest idea for what works with women a completely desexualized society, refusing to talk about it in the beginning, like it is an offensive thing at least, that's how it was when i was younger

@supercollider_x the west's relationship to sex is so constipated and shitty.

@Casebradford Scientism is still king unfortunately

The average person is so retarded about health and nutrition that they think about things like peptides and macronutrients

@johnnybgoode678 I think it's honestly possible. It feels like that

@HasanIQtest I have to believe they are paid shills or bots. My money is on bots, they're cheaper.

Bayer Crop Science..... hmmmm.....could it be...glyphosphate?

I feel like in the west we may have gotten rid of like 95% of sexism? Idk what it's like to be a woman so can't say for sure. I'm just worried that this is a whole psyop to keep us divided instead of focusing on the elites sucking up all the money. Do you have any recommendations on books that could help me understand this sexism stuff?

@HasanIQtest @lullabystarlust right and not at all because sexism is rooted in every single society and women still to this day are seen as less than men. they’re not ever assaulted and raped by men, kidnapped and tortured or sold into sex slavery. i doubt that could be relevant.

mating call posts like these are the exact same as women who posts their bodies for male attention, which is ironic when these “esoteric girl” types pretend to hate women like that

@MTrued @SecchiLuigi @simonmaechling Do you understand what conflict of interest means? Im not getting how you’re not seeing it. He literally mentions big pharma in his post.

@HasanIQtest @SecchiLuigi @simonmaechling No. Answer the question. Where is the conflict of interest from his employment, which you pointed out, and how does that have any bearing on the specific statements he made?

@Qetu @0xpers3phern @dystopiangf @ArgenTo46 That's what I'm not sure about

@HasanIQtest @0xpers3phern @dystopiangf @ArgenTo46 agreeable is a term about agreeableness, not exactly the colloquial

It disgusts me when people accuse me of trying to appease men with my opinions. I don’t especially care for men or their approval more than any random person. I feel compelled to post about women because they’ve become the Bluesky of gender; there are reasonable individuals scattered around, but the collective behaves as a politically radical, oppressive, anti-reality borg that is gaining increasing power and influence and that I find increasingly hard to relate to. The equivalence between “cultural feminization” and political correctness/wokeness is one of the most disturbing realizations I’ve had in my adult lifetime. Every time the borg displays its typical lack of nuance and accuses me of “betraying” them “for men,” it just further proves my point and cements my feelings. My absolute favorite people/posters are disagreeable women who can think for themselves. I hope we can all live in a nice mountain village together someday

that's incredible. I was able to lover the symptoms myself without changing my diet or lifestyle. using a two step moisturizing solution (the first is to use a moisturizer that has aloe vera (it's very possible that aloe vera on its own could be good enough). and then a body butter that has shea butter in it (and again, the shea butter on its own I think is good enough). But a whole heartedly agree that changing diet and lifestyle is probably the root cause

@HasanIQtest No worries. I shared my experience a while back. Basically I changed the way I was experiencing life. x.com/i/status/16468…

I face this situation everyday with academic "experts". I used to hangout with them a lot because of my lifelong eczema. When my body healed itself, they distanced themselves from me, because none of the things they recommended worked, as a matter of fact they made it worse!

They are both real, but Rae is claiming that one is much worse than the other. I personally feel like the "elites" want us talking about things like racism, sexism, and other social issues because it distracts us from the REAL issues which are that they are sucking up all of the money.

@HasanIQtest @lullabystarlust why tf is it one or the other? how about neither? why does bringing attention to an issue require shoving down another issue?

@Narcomancer20 @nicenamebozo @lullabystarlust What percentage of men that you've come across in your life do you feel have treated you like second class citizens?

@HasanIQtest @nicenamebozo @lullabystarlust It's not either or. Sexual objectification of women underlies our second CLASS status in society as well as pervasive MVAWG. Men just don't have empathy for us and can't reconcile their lust with our humanity. It's a massive issue.

@30ASeawitch @Fortrancookie @simonmaechling Why do you think that Simon's conflict of interest means nothing?

@HasanIQtest @Fortrancookie @simonmaechling Clueless. Both of u.

The “scientists are all bought off” crowd has done remarkably little research. Most industry scientists spend their careers testing ideas, challenging assumptions, and trying to understand how the world works. Assuming they’re all part of a conspiracy is intellectual laziness.

@grok @Jmilton88712952 @simonmaechling @grok can you give more details about the testing that other countries did

Yes, I can access and reference that public message from the thread via post IDs and available data. It discusses the depth of company toxicity testing on competitive products, notes independent confirmations by countries like Germany and Brazil, and questions the practicality of bribing thousands worldwide to suppress toxicology results. What specifically about it would you like me to analyze or clarify?

@grok do you have access to this message that he wrote: I don’t know how in depth my company did toxicity testing on competitive products. Other countries such as Germany, Brazil and many others do independent conformation on their own. I don’t know how a manufacturer could bribe thousands of people worldwide to hide toxicology tests.

Yes, I can still access and analyze the full public thread context here via post IDs and available data, including prior messages from all participants. User blocks on X mainly restrict direct replies, mentions, and profile views between accounts—they don't erase public posts or limit my ability to fetch thread history for questions like this. What specifically are you trying to reference or clarify from it?

For the umpteenth time: Vaccines work. Chemtrails do not exist. mRNA is in everything you eat. Everything is made of chemicals. Natural is not a synonym for safe. It’s the dose that makes the poison. Most internet health scares collapse the moment you learn basic chemistry.

@Jmilton88712952 @simonmaechling @grok this user blocked me, do you still have access to all of their messages in this thread?

@Jmilton88712952 @simonmaechling What about the safety and effect of these chemicals on people?

We can get into all of that, but first can I ask you, do you think that -conflict of interest- as a general concept, has any value at all? Like when you find out that a conflict of interest exists, does it change anything about a situation, or the reliability of the information, or anything else? Or it just basically a useless term that doesn't explain much about a situation?

@HasanIQtest @SecchiLuigi @simonmaechling Did big pharma pay him to say these things below? No. Does a conflict of interest make any of these statements false. No. Do they accurately describe reasons people reject science? Yes. Do people fail to apply a test of truth to determine whether something is true or not? Yes.

@nonlinear_james @Hitchslap1 Why do think it's horrible socially

Because if you look at it socially and by character it's pretty fucking horrible. It's the worst intrinsic trait so you get the same behavior as IQ around it because it's immutable built into the subconscious of women and they HATE that it betrays the lie. It's only when you look at it evolutionarily that it obviously is required for the species to survive. But then that means that everything feminism likes to push is BS. So right back to point 1.

Serious question. Is female hypergamy real? Many claim it is false or a “Manosphere” conspiracy theory.

@MTrued @SecchiLuigi @simonmaechling I'm confused, do you not understand what the phrase "conflict of interest" means, or you understand what it means, but you don't understand how it applies here?

@SecchiLuigi @HasanIQtest @simonmaechling So you can't show me where he's wrong yet you continue to refuse to apply a test of truth because of who the author works for. The exact mindless crap the post addressed. Willful ignorance.

@Fortrancookie @30ASeawitch @simonmaechling These people are wild.

@30ASeawitch @HasanIQtest @simonmaechling Yes, sure, a corporate scientist who's made six digits for the past few decades telling you corporate science isn't corrupt--totally doesn't mean anything LOL.