cobrasnake69

@DM_Deluca @MarcoFattorini @threadreaderapp unroll

«Gli italiani non vogliono la terza guerra mondiale, dove ci state portando». Piaccia o meno, con gli argomenti di Conte bisogna misurarsi sul serio. E lo devono fare soprattutto coloro che hanno davvero a cuore l'Ucraina. Un thread 👇🧵 (video da @MarcoFattorini)

@AssiaVonNeumann Bon, ma se il tema di una fiaba è che i neri hanno il ritmo nel sangue come la mettiamo?

Gli “stereotipi” nelle fiabe si chiamano archetipi, e non sono sinonimi

@maxcoccia @AssiaVonNeumann Come ha scritto Kasparov, la notte dei cristalli era una protesta contro le vetrine

@AssiaVonNeumann Comunque eccolo.

A quel punto fummo colti da un leggero sospetto

@Theholisticpsyc Ok, but let‘s not overdramatise it either. Even if you contact them because you want a different outcome and you are disappointed it’s not a trauma you’ll never recover from

Are you contacting them because you want closure or because you want a different outcome? Let that answer guide your decision.

@marco_beccaria Boldrin è un disastro mentale

Del non capire un cazzo, un caso di scuola.

@arcobalengo Fa ridere ma anche pensare

Ricordo come ridacchiavate, vicino alle stalattiti. Eravate allegrotte

@sasakifujika Anche l’estero è fatto di tamarri, peraltro

Madonna scarola che due cazzo di coglioni. Io mo’ che chiunque ne sappia più di un’agenzia gigantesca che da decenni fa roba gigantesca forse anche meno. Non ti piace, e ok, va bene. Ma quale eleganza dell’Italia. Ma guardatevi attorno: l’Italia è fatta di tamarri. Da decenni.

@nntaleb I think the bias is that one “over”-overestimates probability. Nobody can tell if an event occurs with 0.1 or 0.2 % probability, but if he thinks that it’s 5 % it’s definitely an overestimation

Huge. Daniel Kahneman acknowledging publicly that Prospect Theory does not work under fat tails (or unknown probabilities), hence there is no "bias" in these circumstances.

@AssiaVonNeumann Beh è una legge: se il titolo è una domanda la risposta è sempre no

No.

@Theholisticpsyc I guess that the point of the article is the void use of psycho gibberish to leave a person, not the dynamic between them

Lots of people asking me to weigh in on this. My thoughts: 1. A vast majority of people wouldn’t be able to communicate this, which is why most people ghost friends or people they’re seeing, so I give credit for at least somewhat communication. 2. This article completely leaves out what dynamics were going on in the friendship. Abuse or codependency in friendships is very real. If you’ve experienced this, you understand. 3. At 24 years old relationships end, shift, and grow as we evolve. The end of a friendship doesn’t mean anyone is bad or wrong. It’s part of life. We tend to believe friendships should or need to last forever— this isn’t the case. It’s not always selfish to choose to end a relationship. Sometimes, it’s actually the healthiest choice we can make for everyone involved. 4. It *is* compassionate to tell someone you can’t support them in the way they need or that they should seek therapy/professional help if you see them in cycles or patterns where they’re seeking you to fulfill a therapist role. 5. If someone asks you to explain why they’re ending a relationship and they say “there’s no room for discussion” (assuming abuse isn’t present) they’re likely highly avoidant. Would you want to keep a friendship with someone who wasn’t capable of this? Or who didn’t open up the conversation until they were at a breaking point? Likely not. 6. Of course a face to face conversation would have been much better. This is assuming both friends are capable of open mature communication. 7. The end of relationships is very painful experience. We’ve all been through it. And usually in the end, after a grieving and processing period it begins to make sense.

@LexieLexotan Finalmente una verità su Twitter

Le buste di rucola sono troppo grandi nessuno ha bisogno di tutta quella rucola

@HaggardHawks This is unfortunately bullshit

‘Only a counterfeit fears the touchstone’ is a 17th century proverb implying that only people who are guilty need be afraid of a trial.

@heykahn What it's definitely sure is that AI already created a cottage industry of people explaining what AI will create.

300 million jobs will be replaced by AI. 1 in every 5 jobs will be affected ― and almost nobody is prepared for this. Here's a quick 2 minute summary to help you understand how advances in AI will impact your life and career:

@EmmeBi Ed è subito sindrome di Stendhal

La geografia spiegata bene a noialtri fissati, attraverso le band e gli artisti originari di ciascuna contea che hanno in assoluto venduto di più.

@Theholisticpsyc There is however a thin line between setting boundaries and being unfriendly. People used to please may set unnecessary boundaries in the learning phase und suddenly find themselves in the asshole role.

Healing from people pleasing means beginning this (uncomfortable) practice of setting boundaries on a consistent basis. The end result is self trust and confidence— keep practicing!

@EmmeBi Ma sai che era meglio la versione con giovedì?

Quindi oggi è Martedì Falso Magro?

@Poesiaitalia Purtroppo però l’asocialità non rende intelligenti

"Un alto grado d'intelligenza tende a rendere un uomo asociale". Arthur Schopenhauer

Qualcuno doveva dirlo

The history of tech innovation, explained

🚨🚨🚨🚨 IL FC CHIASSO È SALVO! 🚨🚨🚨🚨 La trattativa con l’investitore interessato è andata in porto. A breve l’ufficialità. (via @IlSala1972)