offpolicy

325 posts

offpolicy banner
offpolicy

offpolicy

@offpolicy

Reader, fixer, free agent

SF انضم Mayıs 2015
1.5K يتبع1.3K المتابعون
offpolicy
offpolicy@offpolicy·
@DeeZe Gold BAYC from 15 ETH to 1000 ETH to liquidated 🫡
English
0
0
9
150
DeeZe ⛳🏌️‍♂️
What’s your largest round trip? Bonus points if you comment with the initial buy, peak value, and sell price.
English
176
5
154
78K
Lukas (computer) 🔺
Lukas (computer) 🔺@SCHIZO_FREQ·
How is it so bad? This is literally $JUP-tier. Entire market pumping like 400% and Celestia can't even poke the next level up It's possible the token may be cursed by God himself. There is a nonzero chance your soul will burn in hell if you invest in this token.
Lukas (computer) 🔺 tweet media
Lukas (computer) 🔺@SCHIZO_FREQ

@screentimes If you asked me this question two weeks ago I would have said Celestia. Unfortunately since then it's become the worst token in the entire universe

English
5
3
27
12K
offpolicy
offpolicy@offpolicy·
@CoinDesk @Injective_ Yo dawg I heard you like speculative ecosystems with no organic adoption so I put a 404 in your Injective
English
0
0
0
363
Arcade.xyz
Arcade.xyz@Arcade_xyz·
Where should Arcade launch next?
English
41
11
69
9.1K
offpolicy
offpolicy@offpolicy·
@loopify @Arcade_xyz @wabdoteth There are many opportunities to earn future airdrops in less time-sensitive ways by using the protocol. The Level 0 Airdrop (open since October) has a claim window of 6 months. Those who won today now have a full day to set themselves up to claim within that short window
English
1
0
4
330
Arcade.xyz
Arcade.xyz@Arcade_xyz·
The Clash of Claims whitelist checker is live. Check to see if you were selected: arcadedao.xyz/airdrop If you made the cut you will have 2 hours to claim your ARCD tomorrow (Feb 21) from 6:00 - 8:00pm UTC. You do NOT need to connect a wallet to check the whitelist. This will be the same site used to access the claim. Note: The ARCD whitelist & claim site is unavailable to individuals in restricted jurisdictions.
Arcade.xyz tweet media
English
95
30
193
83.3K
offpolicy
offpolicy@offpolicy·
Beau, I respect the uncompromising focus on user safety; if users took that upon themselves we wouldn’t need this conversation, so you are being the change we need to see in the space and that should only be applauded. But I’m having trouble with your logic here: If we were to tell people, “go use the protocol to get a future airdrop”, that would be fair game right? Been a standard part of the protocol growth playbook since the days of Yearn. However, using the protocol usually requires one to connect a wallet, approve some tokens, and then actually submit on-chain transactions. I don’t think one would argue that asking people to use their protocol would equate to leading them into the arms of scammers; the great thing is, we’re asking them do even less. No on-chain transactions, no token approvals, just connect a wallet, sign and qualify! Pretty cool. And we both know that wallet popups 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨. Let’s disabuse ourselves of the notion that signing anything could lead to losing your funds, because it discourages people from using their own eyes and thinking critically at the actual moment of time of signing. If it doesn’t look like structured data - and 𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘦, 𝘪𝘵 𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘺 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵, 𝘪𝘵’𝘴 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘥𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴 - it’s overwhelminglly likely to be safe. Safer than encouraging people to make token approvals and farm the protocol, which describes dozens of “pre-airdrop” campaigns open at this very moment. Now one could say, well that’s fair, but phishing sites could swap our harmless payloads with harmful ones, and the added time pressure might increase susceptibility for those who leap before they look. On your feedback, we’ve addressed that; now there’s a raffle, with pre-announced winners, and a pre-announced claim window. Boom, check on this day if you won, and if you did, just set a reminder on your phone. You've got time now. And again, in many of these other campaigns, time pressure 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴 an issue; how many times have you heard protocols use messaging like, “we’re raising the caps, get in before they’re full!”. In conclusion, I posit to you that given our setup already, which involves low-touch qualification requirements and reduced time pressure - again, thanks to your feedback! - we’re 𝘴𝘢𝘧𝘦𝘳 than the large majority of airdrop campaigns that have run in history and are currently running. We think our setup is fair and balanced, we’re proud of it, and we’re excited to continue being leaders in security in the space; as we’ve been over the past 2 years, with over six audits from best-in-class firms (all available on Github and in our docs), multiple completed crowd audit contests, and an open bug bounty program which has paid out over $50,000 to whitehats since our initial protocol launch, all without losing user funds. I respect what you’re doing but given the points explained above your position is reaching the point of disingenuity. We’re on the same team; let’s work together constructively to empower people to 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭 𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘬 𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘺𝘴𝘪𝘴, explore the wild and wonderful space of on-chain NFT finance, and protect themselves all at the same time. Cheers fren 🤝
English
0
0
3
39
Beau
Beau@beausecurity·
You are encouraging everyone reading your tweet to connect their wallet to a website to potentially qualify for future airdrops that they are not currently qualified for. Folks will see Arcade impersonators on the TL and rush in hoping to get free money and end up getting scammed. The advice I gave your team was to avoid having folks connect wallets and sign anything unless it was absolutely necessary. Of course security is a personal responsibility, but imo you guys are creating circumstances that are easy for scammers to take advantage of
English
1
0
3
117
Toast
Toast@DeFiToast·
While the Sappy Seals, Pudgy Penguins & lils will be automatically entered, connecting your wallet & checking out Arcade probably won’t hurt your chances of future activations… just saying 🤷
Arcade.xyz@Arcade_xyz

The Sappy Seals have been called into the ARCD Clash of Claims. If you hold a @sappyseals (staked included) you are automatically entered into the ARCD airdrop raffle. Snapshot will be taken Monday - Feb 19 at 8:00pm UTC Check out app.arcade.xyz Arf. 🦭

English
1
2
17
2.5K
offpolicy
offpolicy@offpolicy·
@sama A dahlia unfolding on a vantablack background, soundtracked by low-frequency chanting
English
0
0
0
20
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
we'd like to show you what sora can do, please reply with captions for videos you'd like to see and we'll start making some!
English
13.8K
2K
28.2K
7.2M
offpolicy
offpolicy@offpolicy·
That would mean there would need to be 4000 unique "bot" wallets all holding eligible NFTs. Given that organic distribution was one of the main criteria for qualifying communities I don't think that's the case We do encourage every eligible holder to be ready to act fast, and automate contract interaction (i.e. "bot" it) if it's within their skill set. Can help avoid UI-based phishing attacks this way as well
English
0
0
1
53
offpolicy
offpolicy@offpolicy·
@beausecurity @Arcade_xyz Yes, correct, users should check URLs as they always do - for those who think that they might lose focus due to being rushed, this claim might be too risky for them. As for delegation, if a penguin is delegated at the time of snapshot then the delegated wallet will be eligible
English
3
0
6
10.8K
offpolicy
offpolicy@offpolicy·
@icebergy It makes it easier to rehypothecate tokens and provides a trusted slashing function that allows slashers to enforce honest operation (in any execution context) against the stakers
English
0
0
1
786
icebergy ❄️
icebergy ❄️@Icebergy·
Do you guys understand eigenlayer?
English
175
4
334
142.8K
Chris Low
Chris Low@Clowfb·
Nick Saban is retiring, sources tell ESPN. He won six national titles at Alabama.
English
1.2K
6.8K
27.9K
25.8M
offpolicy
offpolicy@offpolicy·
@hpatel @gas_blaster Haven't fully digested it but even the first two suggestions were 🤯 in terms of potential savings
English
0
0
1
24
curiousapple
curiousapple@0xcuriousapple·
This is common problem for all of us @immunefi @MitchellAmador Have you thought of allowing whitehats to skip POC if their accepted reports are above certain threshold and if ratio of accepted/total > some threshold Whitehats with X amount of accepted reports are less susceptible to just spam And lets say they do it in rush to be first for new bounties, their paid/total ratio would drop eventually, forcing them to provide POC from next time.
MiloTruck@milotruck

@0xcuriousapple Yeah spending time to write a detailed report and PoC just for it to be a dupe is 🥲 How do you create a "simple" PoC? Do you just prove the bug is possible at the bare minimum, without demonstrating any impact?

English
5
1
23
11.6K
andy | mnstr mode
andy | mnstr mode@andy8052·
Need to book our honeymoon Anyone have good recs for agencies or places I should be looking into? General vibe is we want it to be chill and relaxing
English
71
0
49
28.4K
offpolicy
offpolicy@offpolicy·
@rkmasiello Most confusing to me is mfs who thought this stuff would never happen. post-ftx, getting through this stage is a requirement for next bulla
English
0
0
1
55
Rob Masiello
Rob Masiello@rkmasiello·
cobie told us not to trade in February, boy was he right crypto is entirely PvP right now + govt is lvl ??? raid boss just accept you are fighting lvl 100 warlocks and wait until the environment changes to PvE (up only ez mode)
English
4
0
15
813
offpolicy
offpolicy@offpolicy·
@0xfbifemboy Great cocktails at here nor there. Get the mezcal soda
English
0
0
0
0