unify
3.9K posts
someone put $308,000 on blackjack on 1win and walked away with $456,000. most people will read that and think one of two things: “that’s insane.” or “i wish that was me.” but here’s what's interesting, blackjack isn’t even the biggest opportunity on @1winPro right now. because while that was happening, 1win put $5,000,000 on the table for the world cup. 5,000 winners and no $308,000 stake required. here’s all it takes to get in: ⪼ create an account on 1win ⪼ deposit a minimum of 5 USDT ⪼ place a bet of 1 USDT on any FIFA world cup match with odds of 1.50 or higher ⪼ earn points, climb the leaderboard, and win. prizes start at $30 and scale all the way to $500,000. the world cup is already one of the most unpredictable tournament in recent memory. every match is an opportunity hiding inside a question nobody can answer with certainty. that’s exactly where @1winPro exists, right at the intersection of conviction and reward. link in the comments to get started.
building a tokenized receivable financing protocol on @0xpolygon more details coming to your screen soon.
update on my product - sworn. sworn: the bonded dispute layer for @genlayer. probably wwondering if this is an intelligent oracle but it's not, works in alignment with adjudication and not resolution. key takeaway: a sworn statement is true until consensus says otherwise. and the the thing gated is economic finality with no trusted resolver - an off-chain server doing this is the captured-oracle problem SWORN exists to kill. works this ways : swear (bond) → optimistic window → bonded challenge → consensus on a label → slash the loser → read_truth() nothing settles on the asserter's word alone, and nothing settles on the LLM's word alone - the label only matters once a bonded challenger has put their own money where their disagreement is and an unchallenged claim costs zero LLM calls - a challenged one costs exactly one consensus round, paid for by the loser's bond. thanks to @edgarsnemse - was able to resolve the issue of the gen_call getting a rate limited due to assertions. was supposed to share full details on how it works w video clip but im unable to, reason being on mobile devices - there's lack of hierarchy but works well on desktop. will get the bug fixed before the wks runs out + thinking of adding or incorporating a new archi to the product to avoid rpc being broken in the future. this is just a sneak peak of what's coming to your screen soon, will make it make sense once it's all finalized and ready. and off course, would lub to hear feedback from you all - appreciate. link here : sworn-eight.vercel.app (home page - hierarchy bugs) sworn-eight.vercel.app/console (the real deal). genn.
