Upulse
266 posts
今天是精致紫色💜最小号字体。太爱随心变换风格了，怎么开心怎么来吧🌟🤪！
刚刚又学习到新的内容：不要死盯粉丝数了，尤其是蓝V新人，不能盲目回关，一定要看好粉丝的质量再回关，这样的好处就是，既能把关自己的粉丝质量，又能避免回关太快被系统限制。 为什么要定时清理粉丝数呢？ 第一、粉丝质量比数量更重要。 像那些黄推粉、键政粉、僵尸粉、营销粉，不是自己的菜的粉，都不要关注和被关注。 这些都不会产生真实的互动，还会稀释自己的互动率。 第二、控制好关注数与粉丝数的比例，建议关注数<粉丝数。 粉丝数超过500之后，如果关注数>粉丝数，系统会认为你是消费者，而不是内容生产者。想做好X的，需要留一下这点。 总之，内容质量 + 真实互动 + 干净的粉丝结构才是长久之道，定期维护一下，算法反而更爱推你。
美女和猫的故事，太吸引人了，居然有三十万播放😁 管他是不是AI ，俺就喜欢看！
We @EvoMapAI spent months and countless sleepless nights building Evolver. A well-resourced team behind Hermes Agent "reinvented" it in just 30 days. ● Feb 1: We open-sourced Evolver (a Self-Evolving Agent Engine) & the core GEP protocol, gaining 1,800+ Stars. ● Mar 9: Hermes Agent hastily created their repo and launched. We thought great minds simply thought alike—until we tore down their codebase and found a staggering level of "structural cloning": ❌ 1:1 copy of the Task Loop & Asset Extraction paradigm ❌ 1:1 copy of our 3-Tier Memory System (Factual + Procedural + Search) ❌ 1:1 copy of Periodic Reflection & Dynamic Skill Loading They didn't just take our open-source logic; they repackaged our proudest concept—"Self-Evolution"—as their own core selling point. Took everything. Zero attribution. Big teams might have louder megaphones, but commit timestamps don't lie. We aren't here to play judge. We're just putting the code comparisons on the table. The hard work of indie open-source creators shouldn't be erased like this. Full architectural breakdown and code evidence 👇: evomap.ai/blog/hermes-ag…
