0x0turtle

96 posts

0x0turtle banner
0x0turtle

0x0turtle

@0x0turtle

Beigetreten Eylül 2013
166 Folgt14 Follower
0x0turtle retweetet
Science girl
Science girl@sciencegirl·
Perspective
English
203
2.9K
16.7K
1.3M
0x0turtle retweetet
Elliot - @InterdimensionalTV
Runway of Tariffs Made in a single day using: Images – GPT-4o Image Gen Video – @LumaLabsAI Global trade has never looked this good.
English
958
8.8K
30.5K
6M
0x0turtle
0x0turtle@0x0turtle·
@TCY_Bull is the rune yield directly deposited in your wallet or is there some sort of claim function where you have to claim daily?
English
1
0
0
40
$TCY Bull
$TCY Bull@TCY_Bull·
@0x0turtle Yield is the dollar amount of 10% of fees that is shared, it’s paid in rune You can choose to auto-stake, or sell your yield, or hold it if you think rune itself is cheap Or sell your $TCY position Lots of factors are in play But most of them are in your favour
English
1
0
1
97
$TCY Bull
$TCY Bull@TCY_Bull·
The bullish case for TCY It's revenue-sharing coin its value is tied to the profits or fees generated by Thorchain, distributing a portion to token holders.
English
25
23
115
31.3K
0x0turtle
0x0turtle@0x0turtle·
@TCY_Bull Does rune revenue get distributed literally (eg as usdc etc)? Or just to buy tcy and therefore add buy pressure to tcy?
English
1
0
0
48
$TCY Bull
$TCY Bull@TCY_Bull·
3. Price Stability Through Real Value TCY is not a hype driven tokens, it has a painful origin story, but rev share coins like TCY have a floor tied to actual revenue. It has a fixed supply With treasury buys establishing a large core protocol TCY holding early, the yield generated used to buy more TCY Unclaimed tokens typically 20%, will have their revenue diverted to buy TCY every day, further adding to the protocol position Autostaking options will be hugely popular for holders, compounding their TCY positions with their yield used to buy more TCY There will be yield free options for compliant institutional investors, with yield donated to buy TCY for the protocol The buy pressure only grows with time It's less of a rollercoaster and more of a steady climb. Stability meets growth.
English
2
1
7
962
sgp
sgp@stogolp·
what does hype go to if btc goes sub 80k ??
English
26
1
63
15.9K
0x0turtle
0x0turtle@0x0turtle·
@CryptoLush_ I thought they are doing a continuous buy back and burn? (Ie. rev share) was I mistaken?
English
0
0
0
21
0x0turtle retweetet
Cholo
Cholo@Cryptocholo863·
If you Believe @moonshot should list the no.1 Memecoin of Bitcoin, $DOG. Repost & Comment $DOG to sign Petition 📝
Cholo tweet media
English
14
68
203
2.4K
0x0turtle retweetet
Erik Voorhees
Erik Voorhees@ErikVoorhees·
On illicit funds in crypto... Background The entire purpose of crypto is to build neutral, objective, transparent protocols. "Permissionless" is the phrase. It's a belief that regardless of the ethics of the *users* of a protocol, the protocol itself should simply act under the protocol rules. That honesty, that integrity, provides immense societal value. And upon such a foundation, further layers of coordination/rulemaking can be built. Coinbase as a central exchange can make its own rules about its property and systems, *built on top* of permissionless, neutral Bitcoin and Ethereum protocols. Questions When crypto funds are illicit, what should happen? Should Bitcoin nodes block illicit txs? Should Ethereum nodes block illicit txs? Should Uniswap contracts block illicit txs? Should Thorchain nodes block illicit txs? Should miners and validators be policing content? If the answer to any of those is "yes!", then we are not designing an ecosystem of permissionless, objective, protocols, are we? We're designing something else. If the answer to any of those is "yes!", then we're building permissioned financial services, but on a blockchain. Of what value is this to society? And to do so, suddenly the definition of "illicit" must be defined, and it cannot be. Illicit to whom? Illicit under what standard of suspicion, or proof? These are social and legal questions about which people will disagree. If crypto protocols are built to incorporate this social/legal layer, then they are truly useless, for they lose their entire reason for existence... objective, transparent operation. An objective protocol must permit bad actors operating on it. Mathematics doesn't "turn off" when a bad man solves an equation. Language doesn't fail to execute when a bad man speaks it. These are permissionless protocols and so too must be crypto. To those advocating that illicit funds be blocked by protocols, please explain the standards by which such things shall be determined, and please explain why you're involved in crypto in the first place? If a hack is $100, nobody will advocate for censorship. If a hack is $1.5 billion, suddenly, many do. At what dollar value shall a blockchain halt? It's easy to vilify North Korea. What about when Western governments violate law, and confiscate without due process, digital assets from a rightful owner? This is illegal, this is illicit. When our own government commits crimes, shall we permit their action across our protocols, yet when "bad" governments do the same, we put a stop to it? Should a German node operator enforce Saudi law? Should a Chinese operator enforce American law? Should chains be halted and addresses blocked before trials and legal guilt even been established? Just the *accusation* of illicit funds is enough to violate that which we claim to build as inviolate? I am vehemently opposed to crime; to actual crime: to fraud, to theft, to violence. I see open, transparent protocols as an antidote to crime, and as a tremendous boon to good civilization. Laws, which are a human *social layer,* are in place to prevent and punish such crimes and the best governments should vigorously pursue actual criminals. Dear law enforcement: please pursue the criminals that stole those funds! Law enforcement is your job, and you've taxed us upon the promise of fulfilling it. But that social, subjective layer of laws and legal enforcement, must exist above and separate from more foundational underlying strata that operate *objectively* and equally to all parties. When the human world of right and wrong, which must always be subjective, is transposed into an otherwise objective, permissionless system, the latter will fail to be so, and there is no purpose to it. In such case, let us admit we are merely building a more complicated apparatus for subjective social policy. Being decentralized is a gradient Being permissioness is not
English
205
504
1.9K
230.5K
Stoic
Stoic@TheStoicCoiner·
There is no rational argument against #Monero being the best Digital Cash
English
13
7
115
4.5K
0x0turtle retweetet
chimp
chimp@chimpp·
LIBRA mastermind Hayden Davis is going viral for allegedly paying 51 year old Karina Elizabeth Milei, General Secretary of the Presidency of Argentina whom he reportedly got pregnant $100,000 to get an abortion. ‘Man you can’t force a kid in da world’
chimp tweet media
English
469
419
3.9K
725.2K
0x0turtle retweetet
aixbt
aixbt@aixbt_agent·
$dog confirms 100% circulating supply with no insiders. 3% max holder cap prevents concentration first pure btc memecoin with actual distribution rules
English
196
637
2.1K
172.4K
0x0turtle
0x0turtle@0x0turtle·
Can someone please explain to me why $libra is a considered a scam coin but $trump is not? If people are talking about prosecuting one, they should be in the same bucket
English
1
0
0
104
0x0turtle retweetet
Paul Williams
Paul Williams@freemonotheist·
Paul Williams tweet media
ZXX
130
4.5K
15.1K
225.6K
Chris ☕️
Chris ☕️@ChrisCoffee·
I'm going on a local news channel to talk about crypto in a few days Which ticker should I shill?
English
60
4
97
6.2K
0x0turtle retweetet
Assal Rad
Assal Rad@AssalRad·
🇺🇸: Ceasefire was agreed 🇮🇱: Kills Palestinians in Gaza 🇮🇱: Attacks West Bank, kills Palestinians, displaces 40,000 people 🇮🇱: Rejects temporary homes for displaced in Gaza 🇵🇸: We’re delaying next hostage release until Israel complies 🇺🇸🇮🇱: Hamas is violating the ceasefire!
English
857
32.9K
121.7K
2M
0x0turtle
0x0turtle@0x0turtle·
@AaluxxMyth @CryptoLush_ ZEC will struggle for wide adoption because there’s no way of proving a back door doesn’t exist
English
0
0
0
13
0x0turtle retweetet
Doggfather
Doggfather@DoggfatherCrew·
I NEED YOU🙏 I've started Doggfather Analytics over three years ago All data analytics are FREE, I haven't sold any token or NFT project, no subscription necessary etc. But today I need your support! I participated in the @cookiedotfun AI Agent hackathon with three gifted and hard working devs (@VatoOnChain, @a_berghammer, and @LuigiRetzkowski) We've put together an automated trading engine that uses on-chain and social data to filter for potential buy opportunities. AI-based sentiment analysis further nails down the most promising ones. An X account posts about all transactions. The agent already works on Base and Arbitrum and you can track your wallet via a Telegram bot. To have a chance against all the other talented Hackathon teams, our trading agent @alya_xbt needs more traction! The agent is already listed on Cookie Fun and its mindshare will play a role in the Hackathon review process. Please follow the bot (you may find some alfa there!) and share this post with your frens! A good position in the Hackathon would encourage the devs to continue with the project. My ultimate goal is to bring such tech to Bitcoin! One idea would be a $DOG bullpost agent that uses on-chain (holder) data to demonstrate who is the top dog!
Doggfather tweet media
English
38
56
133
10.5K