PublicStaticVoid / Hanabi Staking +Bribes

Paying 7.7 SOL per epoch (23.1 SOL per week) to someone voting with 97k bSOL, you could be the next

Hanabi Staking will not adopt BAM as it allows arbitrary transaction reordering and censorship. BAM also decreases our block fees and MEV tips according to Vortex's data, making staking to us less attractive even after taking the subsidies into account. Enjoy FCFS tx processing!

@DriftProtocol I hate tweeting but is there a way to submit orders using txs without the fancy fancy v3 relay stuff?

@SolanaSensei @jito_sol @Bybit_Official @JupiterExchange @MarinadeFinance @ZeusNetworkHQ @binance $haSOL

Don't just hold Solana ... Let it work for you by holding a Liquid Staking Token (LST) that earns you an APY in addition to holding SOL. Here are a few examples: JitoSOL, bbSOL, JupSOL, mSOL, btcSOL, bnSOL

Last week’s top 5 APR assets in the main pool are in: 1. SOL-bSOL MLP 20.92% 🔥 2. haSOL 7.82% 3. sSOL 7.61% 4. hubSOL 7.35% 5. JupSOL 7.3%

@NickyScanz @MarinadeFinance Great pool back then, supported validators of all sizes, now sandwiching and block lagging.

What comes to mind when you think of @MarinadeFinance ? If you say something negative, I’ll block you.

@Shiroi_sol @w3e_uk Thanks for letting me know. Will upgrade my indexer to detect those better.

Old Problems in a New Wrapper We received reports from fellow validators: they were approached with offers to join a so-called “private mempool without sandwiches” with promises of “security and high yield.” This sounded too good to be true. Together with @w3e_uk, we decided to validate these claims using on-chain metrics. 1/7

@MarinadeFinance Regardless, pool share percentage wise, it's still much better than jito, so I respect Marinade for finally taking action after so long. It's certainly worth celebrating but a lot more work is needed going forward.

According to my data, if we use a static threshold of 4% (double the cluster average) and filter by validators with more than 200 blocks produced, the amount of sandwichers' stake is 1.23m. If we adopt a dynamic threshold (narrower bands as the number of blocks increases), it's 1.31m.

Earn the highest staking rewards on the market and support validators that engage in far less sandwiching. Stake migrated to Marinade will also earn $MNDE incentives. More updates on Project Migrate coming soon!

@MarinadeFinance $haSOL casually paying 8.2%

Today is a good day to stake some Solana. Let’s cook.

@BlackKingCrypto @MarinadeFinance Just generate new keys and come back bro

@0x7cf @MarinadeFinance x.com/marinadefinanc… 👀

May I once again remind you that @MarinadeFinance stakes to sandwichers. 60% of their pool goes to sandwichers right now. github.com/FixedLocally/s…

@solananew 6M SOL remain delegated to sandwichers. Everybody seemed to have forgotten that they can come back with new keys.

🚨BREAKING: 340,000 SOL REDELEGATED AS MALICIOUS VALIDATORS SLASHED AND BLACKLISTED BY MARINADE SAM — USER REWARDS FULLY PROTECTED!!!🚨

@MarinadeFinance 6M SOL remain delegated to sandwichers. The team seemed to have forgotten that they can just come back with new keys.

340,000 SOL has been redelegated after multiple malicious validators were slashed and added to the Marinade SAM blacklist. User rewards remain unaffected—slashed bonds cover any impact Reminder: Marinade is still committed to keeping SAM fair, and protecting Solana’s health

@MarinadeFinance says if you sandwich in >30% of your blocks you get blacklisted! Now the sandwichers can just stay below this number to safely fly under the radar... Plus there just isn't that many sandwichable txs nowadays (cluster average is 1.6%). Marinade once again paid lip service.

@camolNFT That's the token's update authority for updating the token's name/icon etc. The presale funds had already been withdrawn solscan.io/account/Doa8F9…

BREAKING NEWS: PumpFun $PUMP presale contract has no withdrawal function. This effectively means the $500M raised is locked forever, as the smart contract is unable to be updated.

@solblaze_org Happy to see BlazeStake rewarding contribution and ethical behaviour instead of 0.001% more vote credits and the highest bidders. Keep up with the good work!

For too long, sybil operators have been stealing stake away from honest validators. Today, we're fixing that. Introducing the SolBlaze Verified Validators program, a pathway for Solana validators to prove their unique value to the network and gain >10k SOL in stake! 1/12

@MarinadeFinance Last time I asked, the team said they take 50% of all bids

*Winning APY = theoretical maximum yield under perfect conditions (no rebalancing costs, sufficient validator bonds, no Marinade fees)

Well, that was fast. 😮 Just days after removing sandwichers, healthy validators are bidding so competitively that the winning APY is now 0.5% higher than zero-fee validators. The sandwich rate in SAM fell dramatically from 82.42% to 23.50% this epoch. 1/2

@0xjohn_crypto @MarinadeFinance @0xGhostLogs You pay that back by getting sandwiched, and half of the bids actually goes to the team, so eliminating sandwichers actually did you a favour

We’re transparent about the trade-offs. Removing high-bidding malicious validators may temporarily impact APY (estimated ~0.9 percentage points on average). WTF? This was the main reason stakers were choosing Marinade over Jito. This move just opens the door for a competitor to rise and take your market share. People will always stake where the APY is higher. @MarinadeFinance

Marinade’s Statement on SAM Delegation to Negative MEV Validators (Sandwichers): 1/ We’ve reviewed the research shared by the @0xGhostLogs and @0x7cf teams, which highlighted the importance of strengthening our blacklisting efforts.

@MarinadeFinance @0xGhostLogs Appreciate this. Looking forward to further development in safeguarding Solana users as a whole!