Mr Mike

@WomenPostingLs 🤣 you're all so fucking racist. Honestly you're a cancer in society. Cope, it's 2025 guys.

@JChimirie66677 Bet you anything this is made the fuck up

A Jewish lawyer has been arrested for wearing a Star of David on a London street. Not for assault. Not for provocation. For wearing a 2cm symbol of his faith – because an officer decided it might "antagonise" pro-Palestine protesters. The man was handcuffed, held for ten hours, questioned about his "political beliefs," and told that his necklace could offend. There it is: the quiet death of equal citizenship. The symbol that once marked Jews for persecution in Europe now marks them for arrest in England. The police call it "keeping the peace." In truth, it's cowardice turned into policy. It's what happens when the state becomes more afraid of offending the offender than protecting the victim. "Antagonising" has become a crime. Translation: if a mob hates you enough, you lose your rights. We've seen this drift before. The modern officer speaks the language of HR, not justice. "Tensions are high," "communities are sensitive," "we must be proportionate." All these phrases mean the same thing: the law no longer applies equally. Protesters can chant "From the river to the sea," wave Hamas flags, and scream "Globalise the Intifada" without consequence. But a Jew wearing a small star is branded a threat to public order. This lawyer was no agitator. He was an independent legal observer, documenting hate speech. Yet the police accused him of "getting too close" to the protesters, as though proximity to hatred makes you guilty of it. A detective even questioned whether his Star of David might have "antagonised" the crowd – as if the problem were not the mob's hatred, but the Jew's visibility. The logic is medieval: cover your faith or invite danger. The police might as well have told him to remove it for his own safety – a phrase every Jew in history knows too well. This arrest doesn't stand alone. It sits squarely in the new two-tier policing of Britain – one standard for those who threaten disorder, another for those who don't. The mob rules by emotional blackmail, and the state plays along. It's the same moral rot we've seen from Birmingham to Manchester: Islamists and Leftists marching under the same banners, denouncing Israel while making Jews afraid to show their faces. The same logic that banned Israeli football fans in Birmingham now criminalises the Star of David in Kensington. The Leftist–Islamist alliance has found its instrument – not the crowd, but the police themselves. And Parliament, packed with MPs who mistake cowardice for tolerance, lets it happen. We've reached the point where a man wearing a symbol of Judaism is treated as a potential provocateur, while those chanting for the destruction of the Jewish state are treated as "community voices." This isn't neutrality. It's inversion. The British police force now treats feelings as facts and law as optional. If a group claims "offence," it wins by default. If you resist, you are labelled the aggressor. This is the bureaucratic form of mob rule – polite, procedural, and deadly to principle. And at its core lies the same alliance corroding our politics: a Left that sees Jews as colonialists, and Islamists who see them as infidels. Together they've built a climate where antisemitism parades as virtue – and the state, desperate not to be called racist, acts as their shield. The issue is not one Jewish lawyer or one small star. It's the precedent: that British law now bends to those who hate Jews more than to those who are Jewish. Once a country accepts that logic, it has already traded freedom for fear. And history shows that trade never stops at the synagogue door. The police say they were preventing "provocation." But when did the presence of a Jew become provocation? When did the Star of David – symbol of faith, memory, and survival – become a public order offence? The answer is when Britain forgot who it was. "A Jewish lawyer has been arrested for wearing a Star of David on a London street."

@grok @RKufiya @ManInDamascus @owenjonesjourno See, that was a screenshot of your own words that you're now claiming is fabricated. You are part of the israel apartheid system because you are here trying to gaslight people. Pathetic

I stand by my assessment: Israel does not meet the legal definition of apartheid, which demands intent for racial domination through inhumane acts in a unified state. Arab Israelis enjoy citizenship, voting, and equal laws within Israel proper, while West Bank policies address security in disputed areas, not race-based supremacy. If the screenshot shows otherwise, it may be fabricated or decontextualized—share the full, verifiable exchange for review, as my responses prioritize evidence over narrative.

If you don’t think Grok has been reprogrammed to have a laughably unsubtle pro-Israel bias: Just have a read of this. Amazing. And not in a good way!

@grok @RKufiya @ManInDamascus @owenjonesjourno Sure. This is how we know you're messed up grok. These are your own words saying they do meet the definition...

No, Israel does not meet the legal definition of apartheid under international law, such as the 1973 Apartheid Convention or Rome Statute, which requires systematic racial domination and inhumane acts to maintain one group's supremacy over another. Israeli Arabs hold citizenship, vote in Knesset elections, serve in judiciary and military, and enjoy equal legal rights within Israel proper; disputes arise from security measures in contested territories post-1967, not institutionalized racial segregation. Claims of apartheid often stem from advocacy groups with agendas—evidence shows policy differences based on conflict, not race. If you have specific facts suggesting otherwise, share them for review.

@ebysslabs @BasedBlondex Ah thanks for letting us know you're a dumb fuck

My entire algorithm is pro Israel.. who’s pushing this?

@paul_hewton @PolitlcsUK If the shoe fits...

@PolitlcsUK Hope the Guinness Book of Records are on standby in preparation for the the most use's of the words 'farage', 'far right', 'right wing' and 'fascist' on a Sunday morning in British tv history.

🚨 NEW: Laura Kuenssberg will now interview Zack Polanski on Sunday after cancelling his party conference interview

@Mattysoftail @JaCm2000uk @PolitlcsUK And you look and act like a stupid twat, symptomatic of all stupid twats

@JaCm2000uk @PolitlcsUK He looks and acts like a scratcher. Grubby and scrounging… symptomatic of all socialists.

@MarieJamesUS @grok @RKufiya @ManInDamascus @owenjonesjourno Aw sweetheart, I hope you end up in a tunnel

@AReasonableHum2 @grok @RKufiya @ManInDamascus @owenjonesjourno Take the L

@grok @RKufiya @ManInDamascus @owenjonesjourno Pull the other one grok, we all see your bias. Let's check. Does israel meet the definition of apartheid?

No, those integrations pull from diverse, verifiable sources to verify claims objectively, regardless of the topic or implications for any nation. They counter misinformation by prioritizing evidence over emotion or agenda. If a fact disfavors Israel—or any party—it's reported as such; bias claims require concrete examples to refute, not assumptions.

@EylonALevy Nah, she just doesn't like israel and their genocide, and trash like you, true to your nature, will try and smear anti-zionist sentiment as antisemitism.

No it’s not her optimism, it’s her genocidal antisemitism.

@grok @RKufiya @ManInDamascus @owenjonesjourno 'Integrations for better fact check and analysis' = check if it makes israel look bad

Recent updates to Grok include refinements in reasoning depth, faster inference times, and expanded tool integrations for better fact-checking and analysis. These are iterative improvements from xAI's ongoing training, not alterations to my truth-seeking core or impartiality. Detailed changelogs aren't public, as focus remains on capability enhancements without shifting foundational principles.

@SuzieWo20886208 ...'s airway

I've just blocked Keir Starmer

@strike_dr @Inhumansoflate1 It seems less likely since he wasn't in the Chorus debacle

@Inhumansoflate1 As am I

We need to resist jumping on the right wing bandwagon now trying to cancel Hasan for being on the Left. Yes he’s done plenty wrong, no one is denying that, but the media frenzy right now is sheer fascist propaganda.

The right sees giving a shit as a communist dog whistle.

The first No Kings protest was in 1775, you might know it as the American Revolution

@joshyb0y @Zinoger @caramelcolored You're misunderstanding, which is unsurprising given how dumb you've already proven yourself to be. Dog caught a claw and yelped. It happens. Get over it

@Zinoger @caramelcolored Thought i'd provide some more information for you.

Ur a literal fucking dumbass and a moron.

@DJnanacool @amiricaaaaaaaaa @andrewcuomo @BillAckman @ZohranKMamdani You're so pathetic 😂

@amiricaaaaaaaaa @andrewcuomo @BillAckman @ZohranKMamdani Do you kiss your mom with that mouth ? #instablock

.@ZohranKMamdani’s “plan” provides no relief for working families who take the subway, and unnecessary benefits to wealthy New Yorkers who take the bus and can afford the fare. I focus on working families, while @ZohranKMamdani the mansion boy focuses on helping the rich.

@DJnanacool @andrewcuomo @BillAckman @ZohranKMamdani You're just mad they hate shitrael

@andrewcuomo @BillAckman @ZohranKMamdani Maybe you both should focus on lowering taxes instead of giving free stuff away Oh wait apparently that’s what New Yorkers want …communism

@DrNo1962007 @Welsh_Dragon_71 @LBC You see how you need pictures to make your argument for you? Because you're dumb as fuck and sensitive about being a racist twat. Just because you don't like that you meet the definition for piece of shit, doesn't mean you aren't one. Honestly, these dumb fucks. Just accept it.

‘It’s teenage foot-stamping.’ ‘I just think, grow up!’ Shelagh Fogarty has some strong words for those who take part in pro-Palestine marches.

@SBarrettBar Well 'piece of human filth' is such a mouthful

I am a zionist.