Bahbahbased Sheep✝️

The GATES OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL, a 🧵 You will often hear Roman Catholic apologists cite Matthew 16:18 "and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it" as a prooftext for errors will not befall the Roman Catholic Church. Or does this refer to the salvation extended to members of Christ's Church? Lets see what the Early Church taught... 🧵/1

@HolyPost_Media Who cares about the article on which the church stands or falls, right guys. The creeds!

The label “heretic” gets thrown around way too easily these days. If you profess the Nicene Creed & the Apostles’ Creed, you count as a legitimate Christian. Period. Christians will always disagree about important political & social issues and matters of doctrine. But at the end of the day, if someone affirms the essential truths outlined in the creeds, they are not heretics or apostates. 🎙️Holy Post 670 with @philvischer, @skyejethani & @kaitlynschiess

@goodbreffis If we get Mass deportations these guys can be at the very back of the line

Blink-Juan82 🤟🤟🤟

@Gian_TheBaptist @TomBuck And grace does not destroy nature. Every sexual partner one has leaves a lasting impact on their psyche. And this effect is not uniform across the two sexes

@TomBuck Understand that exceptions are not normative challenge: impossible

If someone argues that a former promiscuous woman is "damaged goods" and questions whether a Christian young man should marry her, remember Rahab. She was a Canaanite prostitute but became a mother in the lineage of Jesus. God redeemed her, cleansed her, and Salmon married her.

@yada_da_mean @goddek @marklevinshow Beware Mark Levin of the pharisees

@goddek @marklevinshow The bread goes by Mark Leaven

Well said

@jew_jacob2005 @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 We've already been over this, ecclesialist. May you one day obey the gospel instead of your institution of man

@BahBahBased @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 U literally didnt even dive into the canon, you made a vague reference to God as if that means anything lmao. Didhonest cult member

I'm seriously starting to doubt Penal Substitutionary Atonement. The responses to the objections against PSA have been weak and dismissal. However, I've advocated for PSA for so long, it's hard to change the way I articulate the gospel. This is a total paradigm shift for me.

@Unashamed_Chuck @SpringhouseFilm @LutheranEpistle children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s will, but born of God. Literally the very next verse

@BahBahBased @SpringhouseFilm @LutheranEpistle But to all who DID receive Him, He gave the right to be called sons of God

@jew_jacob2005 @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 You: -gets proven wrong in the greek regarding Logion vs logos Also, -gives wrong definition of sola scriptura -cant address the OT Canon issue -makes nonsensical statement about how God must act -misused ad hominem accusation What did I miss?

@BahBahBased @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 You: Augustine is sola scriptura because of this quote Me: Heres a quote he holds to tradition You: yeah but this other thing Me:that other thing doesnt make sense You:U place God in a box Me: Then you also place God in a box. You: yeah but when I do it its cool Unfalsifiable

@redeemed_zoomer @whitesocksclips They will import infinity brown adherents of liberation theology so long as they sing ave Maria and are quiet enough for an 8 minute homily once a week

@whitesocksclips Catholicism trying to be the American right is the ultimate “we wuzzery” Catholics made political alliances with leftists in the 20th century to break down the Anglo-Protestant establishment

Nick declares a HOLY WAR with Irish, Mexicans, Italians, and Polish against all Protestants

@jew_jacob2005 @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 You havent proven anything, you've baselessly asserted it. Anyone who reads this conversation can clearly see youre in over your head and incapable of asking questions when the answer challenges your ecclesialist cult

@BahBahBased @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 Even if you called me retarded, wouldnt change the fact you dismiss everything I say, even when youre proven wrong you stack more things whether they make sense or not. Youre in a cult that programs you with this line of dismissal

@jew_jacob2005 @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 More projection

@BahBahBased @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 U dont even know your fallacies. Bullshit like this is why I left the bible cult

@jew_jacob2005 @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 And for the record I am not calling you retarded. That would probably be sinful. Unless you were my friend

@jew_jacob2005 @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 No, an ad hom would say your argument is retarded because you are. I just said your argument is retarded. Because it is

@jew_jacob2005 @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 No, just pointing out your "rules" are retarded

@BahBahBased @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 Proving my point youre the one that is arbitrarily subjective

@StandAndKnox Hard Rs vs 3 Rs

Bro sucks at reading and math lol

@jew_jacob2005 @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 "You cannot get something infallible from something that is fallible" Sure bro

@BahBahBased @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 Its not subjective, its an argument. You cannot get something infallible from something that is fallible. However, my God is consistent in infallibly guiding men in acting in specific circumstances. While you hold to it just is the case. Yours is the real arbitrary position

@jew_jacob2005 @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 Your box is how God must act, according to your subjective and arbitrary standards and assumptions. My "box" is how God has revealed Himself to be, according to His name and his word, which is held higher than your "church"

@BahBahBased @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 Oops that means by your standard God is now in a box, so you hold to a double standard

@jew_jacob2005 @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 Sure, but your argument above isnt

@BahBahBased @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 Is God logically consistent?

@jew_jacob2005 @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 Completely ridiculous assertion, nice box you put God in, Palamite. No wonder your "church" spergs over the Filioque

@BahBahBased @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 The means would have to be infallible, which is detrimental to your position since that would imply men can act infallibly like in Ecumenical Councils, which you reject the authority and infallibility of.

@jew_jacob2005 @shadowcrewtroll @Alex_Ortodoxie @Just4Tweets1986 No, I gave a very general answer about fallible human means preserving and recognizing infallible divine revelation. You just didnt like it bc it goes right at your presuppositions, making you go back to the original point you lost about Gods word being higher than your "church"

@BahBahBased @shadowcrewtroll @Alex_Ortodoxie @Just4Tweets1986 I asked how and you gave a vague answer about God that doesnt address the historicity of the text itself

@jew_jacob2005 @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 Projection once again, Mr. Jew. Only INFALLIBLE authority has always been the definition. And God can give His word through fallible means, what kind of retarded argument says otherwise? He literally put words in a donkeys mouth. Even AI is more honest than you

@BahBahBased @Alex_Ortodoxie @shadowcrewtroll @Just4Tweets1986 Now youre shifting the goalpost, sola scriptura is that only scripture alone is authoritatively binding. When its shown that he holds to authority outside the bible, now its a matter of infallibility. Even then, you cannot get something infallible from something fallible.