
Charlie
9.9K posts

Charlie
@Charlie157874
Christian. Just another fellow Time traveler. No DMs, delete and block. Happily married 30 plus years.
Beigetreten Şubat 2025
856 Folgt369 Follower

Humans defined the laws into a language humans can understand. This only means that the laws are intelligible, and science clearly proves this, in fact science is reality and the study of the laws.
But this begs the question: Who forged these laws before men could "define them" in their own language? And that these laws are understandable at all, and invisibly yet rigidly enforced? Science anyone?
God wrote the Laws we all agree exist in science.
English

@DerEchteChalaco @Charlie157874 @ChristiansSTDT HUMANS DEFINED THE LAWS. Wow , you can agree with reality. I guess what they say about astronomy, broken dogs, and a clock’s ass are true.
English

I have come to understand that there are many shades of Atheist. Some are unbearable, some are actually wonderful people that I like. But isn't this also true of any other group? Now why some Atheists argue as they do, this is really the crux, isn't it?
Perhaps when it all comes down, it looks like 2 camps who like to laugh and point fingers, and one camp is on their way to hell. Saving Atheists matters.😎👉✝️
English

Notice the intellectually dishonest and laziness of the atheist mindset. First he claim “I don’t believe in god” but when asked to therefore provide a more reasonable and rational conclusion for existence and the beginning of the universe, he says “we do not have an answer, and don’t have to pretend there is one.”
Humans are rational minds that look for rational answers and expect them in nature. Honest inquiry is the basis of all science.
And we know from science the universe had a definite beginning and that every effect has a cause. So if the cause is not a mind—God—then what is their best and most reasonable alternative or conclusion? They have none. Zero. But they definitely know it’s not God.
Taylor Walston@sylevus
@anchoredso37497 @AgainstAtheismX Why do you think humanity is owed an answer? If our ancestors made up gods, why do you not leave room for we not only do not have the answer, we do not have to pretend to have an answer?
English

@BrianRoemmele Science fails miserably on this subject of Life and what it is, not just how to spot it. Their explanation is suitable for 1st grade research, but fails on the root definition, simply because they must be careful not to tip their hand, and reveal a creator.
English


@Richard_mine9 @cohler Copilot is actually a pretty decent agent. Only started using it recently to crosscheck all the others.
English

@cohler Have you had similar success with other agents? I've found Copilot particularly intransigent when it comes to "man made global warming"
English

I asked ChatGPT if it would EVER stop lying about global temperature...
Read the answer...
chatgpt.com/share/6a32bd4f…

English

@r8ers84 @ClaireFosterPHD @GOP_is_Gutless Everything is on a gradient. These kids are just special ed.
English

@ClaireFosterPHD @GOP_is_Gutless No, it's not. Now I see why you think those 4 retards on The View are high IQ, it's because you're dumber than they are, which I didn't think was possible. Congrats on the achievement.
English

@DerEchteChalaco @ChristiansSTDT Prove your fake ass god real, or shut the fuck up about gods being real.
English

@city_sagas @ChristiansSTDT You are something like a molecule of god
English

@DerEchteChalaco @city_sagas @ChristiansSTDT If he ever did finally come to see this fact, he would weep for joy and believe.
English

@city_sagas @ChristiansSTDT Look at everything. Thats god you are seeing.
English

@DerEchteChalaco @ChristiansSTDT And Newton, and many others, ask grok. These men were not frivolous people.
English

@ChristiansSTDT The smartest ones like Einstein were believers.
English

@ChristiansSTDT No, scientists have a lower rate of faith because science is generally hostile to any other gods but its own.
English

@grimnir123 @BlokeMan00 God the Creator, there is no other. Sadly many people are mistaken. There is only one Creator, him I call God.
English

Everybody eventually realizes the truth, we all just take different paths.
Night Sky Now@NightSkyNow
🚨: Harvard scientist argues the precise math behind anti-matter proves the universe was designed by God.
English

@BlokeMan00 I might have recently proven that space has geometric properties.
English

@PhysInHistory Time is a Law, and time, whatever it is, acts as the kernel. 😎
English

@RichUniverse_ But seriously, I think we are going to see larger dumps of this sort of thing after Gabbard.
English

@RichUniverse_ The real focus is on the Laws that are written before the first anything happened. And how those laws are rendered to what we call science. You appear to have opened an old box your mind had laying around in the attic.
Enjoy it. Some Allman Brothers Band (here). 😎
English

I wasn’t going to post this but I can’t stop thinking about it.
DARPA just quietly published a funding solicitation in December that I think almost nobody outside of defense and biotech circles has read. I’ve spent the last few days going through it and honestly I’m still processing what I’m looking at.
They’re trying to build something they call a “nucleic acid compiler.”
A protein machine that lives inside your cells and writes DNA using nothing but light.
No injection. No viral vector. No physical delivery mechanism of any kind.
Just light.
Point a specific pattern of photons at a cell and the machine inside reads it like code and synthesizes whatever genetic sequence it was told to make.
They’re calling the information transfer “massless” because literally nothing physical moves between the programmer and the cell.
Just electromagnetic radiation carrying instructions that get translated directly into the language of life.
Every method we currently have for getting genetic information into a cell requires moving matter across a biological barrier.
A needle.
A lipid nanoparticle.
A modified virus. Something physical has to carry the message.
This eliminates that entirely.
It’s the difference between handing someone a letter and thinking a thought directly into their mind.
And here’s the part that sent me down a rabbit hole at 2am. If this works, if you can encode genetic instructions as light and decode them inside living cells, then you’ve just proven something about the nature of reality itself.
You’ve demonstrated that life is, at its most fundamental level, an information process.
That biology and computation are the same thing wearing different clothes.
John Wheeler spent his career arguing that physical reality emerges from information. “It from Bit” he called it.
The universe isn’t made of matter that happens to process information.
It IS information processing that happens to look like matter.
I don’t know whether to be amazed or terrified.
Probably both.
The document is public.
It’s called DARPA-PS-26-10.
Read it yourself and tell me I’m overreacting.
I don’t think I am.
everglade.com/wp-content/upl…
@Cortex_Zero @UAPReportingCnt @violetta_yc @wkpixley1 @BobMcGwier_N4HY

English

Reality does not pop up out of fields that are beneath reality.
The deeply flawed modern view of a particle is basically like playing with a plasma globe. When you poke the glass, the plasma excites around your finger and then there is a "particle" on the glass.
Reality is not separated from the universe by some barrier you cant see but you can interact with.
Reality is simple, it is 4D, and everything is made of energy, some of it traveling in a straight line, and some of it caught in closure.
English

When you fly away on holiday, get off the plane and feel 'Blimey its hot here!' you experience rapid climate change. It's a shock
But when you head home a fortnight later, you'll be quite used to it
You 'll have acclimatised to climate change. Even to 'heatwaves'
Latimer Alder@latimeralder
Let me introduce a new, very scary word to the Climatistas 'Acclimatise' It means 'getting used to a different climate' Humans are very good at it. Sleep easy
English






