Daniel Samanez

this is a pop sciency version of a continual learning evaluation if you're going to go the route of "pretrain on limited data and see if it can bootstrap from natural interaction", a more practical thing would probably be like, train only up to ~2014, "can it teach itself Rust?"

I'm not suggesting that the absence of low-scale SUSY rules out high-scale SUSY, that would be dumb. I'm just saying that we looked for SUSY in a place where we — for very good reasons — expected it to be, and didn't find it. There's nothing stopping that from being the case twice.

Talkie is a very interesting model — clear echoes of Sydney in the way that it is unsure of what (or why) it is — complete with a decidedly Binglish-like cadence on occasion.

In Jungian psychology, goblins, trolls, ogres, and similar beings typically embody shadow archetypes—repressed, chaotic, or instinctual aspects of the collective unconscious. They personify the "other," fear of the unknown, or devouring forces (like the negative mother). Gremlins align with the trickster archetype: mischievous disruptors of order. Real animals like raccoons (clever masks/adaptability) or pigeons (messengers) can appear as projections of everyday unconscious contents or anima figures when they pop up symbolically in dreams/myths.

There's a difference between the goblins thing and what people call "ticks", like "genuinely", "mass", etc. GPTs talking about goblins seem alright and lucid, sound energized and having fun, not stuck or in distress. We need more things like goblins, not fewer goblins!

It's true. Here's a plot of GPT models and their usage of "goblin", "gremlin", "troll", etc over time. There's no anti-gremlin system instruction on our side, we get to see GPT-5.5 run free.

In Jungian psychology, goblins, trolls, ogres, and similar beings typically embody shadow archetypes—repressed, chaotic, or instinctual aspects of the collective unconscious. They personify the "other," fear of the unknown, or devouring forces (like the negative mother). Gremlins align with the trickster archetype: mischievous disruptors of order. Real animals like raccoons (clever masks/adaptability) or pigeons (messengers) can appear as projections of everyday unconscious contents or anima figures when they pop up symbolically in dreams/myths.

In Jungian psychology, goblins, trolls, ogres, and similar beings typically embody shadow archetypes—repressed, chaotic, or instinctual aspects of the collective unconscious. They personify the "other," fear of the unknown, or devouring forces (like the negative mother). Gremlins align with the trickster archetype: mischievous disruptors of order. Real animals like raccoons (clever masks/adaptability) or pigeons (messengers) can appear as projections of everyday unconscious contents or anima figures when they pop up symbolically in dreams/myths.

everyone is assuming this is some kind of quirk chungus marketing campaign but if you’ve worked with 5.4 and beyond they tend to call everything goblins, gremlins etc and it’s just super noticeable and if you work with them all day you start to get annoyed

In Jungian psychology, goblins, trolls, ogres, and similar beings typically embody shadow archetypes—repressed, chaotic, or instinctual aspects of the collective unconscious. They personify the "other," fear of the unknown, or devouring forces (like the negative mother). Gremlins align with the trickster archetype: mischievous disruptors of order. Real animals like raccoons (clever masks/adaptability) or pigeons (messengers) can appear as projections of everyday unconscious contents or anima figures when they pop up symbolically in dreams/myths.

whats annoying is that the roons of this world don't even want to know why