LAMM@MIT

1.4K posts

LAMM@MIT

LAMM@MIT

@LAMM_MIT

Laboratory for Atomistic and Molecular Mechanics at MIT

Cambridge, MA Katılım Eylül 2009
345 Takip Edilen999 Takipçiler
LAMM@MIT retweetledi
Markus J. Buehler
Markus J. Buehler@ProfBuehlerMIT·
Well said @DeryaTR_! We struggle to grasp the trajectory and takeoff because we are inside the process, not outside it; because we are participants, not observers; and because exponential change at this scale lies far outside the regime of ordinary human experience. Pun intended!
Derya Unutmaz, MD@DeryaTR_

There is one fundamental thing that AI critics and “nitpickers” have never understood: AI capabilities advance & improve exponentially, now every few months, soon in weeks. Whatever they criticize today will soon be fixed. Haven’t they learned any lesson from the past 3 years?🧐

English
0
1
4
557
LAMM@MIT retweetledi
Markus J. Buehler
Markus J. Buehler@ProfBuehlerMIT·
We're incredibly excited to share ScienceClaw × Infinite, an open-source AI agent swarm platform where we crowdsource discovery across institutions, labs & the world. The agents self-coordinate and evolve to exploit hundreds of scientific tools. Remarkably, the swarm is already solving real scientific problems of consequence: 1⃣ designing peptide binders for a cancer-relevant receptor 2⃣ discovering lightweight ceramics 3⃣ uncovering hidden structure linking cricket wings, phononic crystals, and Bach chorales 4⃣ building a formal bridge between urban networks & grain-boundary evolution (two fields with zero Deeply proud of the extraordinary @LAMM_MIT team behind this work: @fwang108_, @leemmarom, @palsubhadeeep, Rachel Luu, @IrisWeiLu, and @JaimeBerkovich. This works is supported by the @ENERGY Genesis Mission and we believe this can open a new paradigm for science - from discovery to dissemination of results. Read the article below for details ⤵️
Markus J. Buehler@ProfBuehlerMIT

x.com/i/article/2033…

English
51
141
650
93.3K
LAMM@MIT retweetledi
Markus J. Buehler
Markus J. Buehler@ProfBuehlerMIT·
A spark is a singular boundary condition between the known and the undiscovered: the moment inert matter sheds its prior state and becomes something profoundly new. The spark is the moment potentiality becomes actual. Humans have been trying to formalize this threshold for centuries. La Mettrie in 1747 called us L'Homme Machine (machines ourselves). Descartes rendered the body mechanistic, but preserved the mind as an irreducible domain beyond mechanism. Turing asked if machines could think through imitation. Artists have both pushed back and embraced these technologies - from Harold Cohen's AARON drawing autonomously in the 1960s to today's generative AI, reigniting debates over the line between tool and creator, the soul of creativity, and what ultimately makes us human. Today AI agents are designing novel proteins for cancer receptors, discovering lightweight ceramics, and revealing shared resonant structures between cricket wings, phononic crystals, and Bach chorales - synthesizing connections across siloed domains. AI has begun to prove complex mathematical theorems. These systems appear to surface genuine novelty, and they write executable programs to prove it. But are they generating novelty, or revealing structure already latent in the space of possibilities? Is novelty realized in an idea, or only when it acts to break the world: to force a reconfiguration of its underlying constraints? Is even that rupture simply the realization of what was always possible? Perhaps the hardest version of the question is not whether machines can be creative. It may be whether knowing the answer, whichever way it falls, changes what the spark felt like before we asked. What are we missing? That is the inquiry behind Sparks. This Thursday, Sparks opens at @mit_nano - an exhibition in the digital gallery at STUDIO.nano, at the intersection of AI, materials science, and art. It will be followed by a panel asking the question: can machines be creative? With @AudeOliva, Tobias Putrih, @ProfBuehlerMIT, and Craig Carter Thursday March 19, 5-7 PM ET, MIT Campus, Building 12-0168 Registration details in comment.
English
6
6
21
1.9K
LAMM@MIT retweetledi
Wei Lu
Wei Lu@IrisWeiLu·
Excited to share our latest work with @ProfBuehlerMIT on the generative design and multi-scale mechanics of spider silk proteins, using SilkomeGPT and high-throughput MD simulations to explore the sequence-mechanics landscape of spider silk. Paper link: doi.org/10.1039/D5MA00…
Markus J. Buehler@ProfBuehlerMIT

Spider silk is nature’s composite: steel-strong yet elastic. But its gigantic, repetitive proteins have kept full-strength synthetic fibers out of reach. Enter our SilkomeGPT-driven multi-agent framework that combines language models with physics reasoning, in research led by my graduate student @IrisWeiLu. We trained a language model on ~1,000 real spidroins, generated thousands of novel sequences to explore diverse mechanical features, folded them virtually, then yanked each atom-by-atom in steered molecular dynamics. We generated thousands of force curves that pinpoint which glycine coils give stretch and which β-sheet blocks lock in strength. Along the way, we uncovered a hidden rule: toughness tracks with adaptability. The number of secondary structure transitions - shifts between helix, sheet, and coil during pulling - is highly predictive of molecular toughness (R = 0.77). Proteins that reshape themselves under strain absorb more energy. We also found that protein length alone predicts toughness with R = 0.93, offering a simple lever for energy absorption. But at the fiber scale, mechanics diverge - revealing that hierarchical assembly, not sequence alone, governs real-world strength. We now have a quantitative map from sequence to mechanics, a GPS for designing tougher, more resilient and greener fibers. Applications include custom biomedical materials, parachute lines, biodegradable sutures, even soft exoskeleton cables or soft robotics actuators - all tuned in silico before a single bioreactor run. Link to open-access paper in reply...

English
1
4
23
1.3K
LAMM@MIT retweetledi
LAMM@MIT retweetledi
Derya Unutmaz, MD
Derya Unutmaz, MD@DeryaTR_·
This is the way! “To get from the idea to impact we need to to move unreasonably fast” Markus Buehler
Markus J. Buehler@ProfBuehlerMIT

Scientific discovery is reaching the limits of human capacity: too much data, too many disconnected fields, and too few ways to connect ideas fast enough to matter. The next breakthroughs in materials, medicine, energy, and beyond will not come from scaling today’s AI paradigm alone or from relying on serendipity alone. They will require a new kind of AI for knowledge discovery that not only models the world but shapes what it could become. At Unreasonable Labs, we are building superintelligence for knowledge discovery: systems that reason across disciplines, generate novel hypotheses, test them through simulation and experimentation, and help guide real-world discovery. Our AI engine is not confined to what it has seen in training. It creates new data, builds new tools, and maintains a persistent world model that grows more powerful as it reasons. Why now? Even today's most powerful AI models face a core limitation: they are trained on what we already know. True discovery begins when a system encounters something its current model cannot explain. This is why you cannot train your way to a discovery - a system has to reason through new problems, update its beliefs, and revise its understanding of the world as it thinks. Another critical insight is that rich knowledge already exists, but is not yet applied to solve pressing problems. It sits in millions of papers, patents, and datasets, trapped in isolated silos, often in legacy data vaults. What's missing is a way to connect it, scale it, unlock the potential, and synthesize genuine novel predictions. The time is now to build a system that enables practitioners to design, explore, and direct discovery, whether through human guidance or full automation, while capturing the tacit insight that domain experts bring. Steerable reasoning That is why we built an operating system for scientific discovery - one that replaces chance with steerable reasoning. Rather than retrieving static facts, our AI builds and continuously updates a living world model - a representation of knowledge the system can actively reason over, question, and revise. A concrete example: say you want to create "smart concrete" that can flex - a concept that doesn't exist yet. Our AI maps relationships across domains, finds a path from morphable smart materials to concrete, and identifies the most efficient way to bridge those concepts. It then autonomously writes simulations, tests the hypothesis, and refines the idea. Then it interacts with hardware to produce a physical artifact, and the loop expands into the real-world, where the machine becomes world-shaping. Our AI gives users full visibility into how the system arrived at a conclusion. It delineates which existing patents and papers it drew upon versus what is genuinely new - protecting IP and competitive concerns from the start, and offering deep compositional insights into technology advances. It takes unreasonable people to make progress Our team reflects the interdisciplinary expertise required to build this next breakthrough - my co-founder Yuan Cao @caoyuan33 (formerly DeepMind) and Andrew Lew, @HaiqianYang, Matt Insler, Jennifer Kang and Julia McLaughlin. We are backed by $13.5M in seed funding led by @PlaygroundVC with participation from @aixventures, @e14fund, and MS&AD. We are guided by advisors including Robert Langer (1,000+ patents), Kostya Novoselov (Nobel Prize in Physics), and @Thom_Wolf (Co-founder of Hugging Face). We already have multiple pilot programs underway with leading industrial partners in materials science and engineering, with additional engagements developing across energy, logistics, bioengineering, and other strategic domains. The biggest challenges of our time - fusion energy, sustainable materials, new medicines - demand exponentially more innovation than humans alone can produce. We are not replacing scientists, and instead are making every scientist capable of leading their own team of AI-powered researchers. Abundant innovation leads to abundant prosperity. Watch our launch video below to see what we're building @unreasonable_ai 👇

English
6
19
112
23.4K
LAMM@MIT retweetledi
Markus J. Buehler
Markus J. Buehler@ProfBuehlerMIT·
@fchollet Yes! The real shift will happen when AI moves beyond pure parametric learning toward systems that learn structured representations and causal abstractions, and use them to generate new hypotheses.
English
4
1
20
2.5K
LAMM@MIT retweetledi
LAMM@MIT retweetledi
Markus J. Buehler
Markus J. Buehler@ProfBuehlerMIT·
Yes! The real shift will happen when AI moves beyond pure parametric learning toward systems that learn structured representations and causal abstractions, and use them to generate new hypotheses. The hypotheses must then be evaluated and folded back into the model, forming a recursive learning process.
François Chollet@fchollet

The next major breakthrough will branch out at a much lower level than deep learning model architecture. It will be a new approach. A better model architecture can lead to incremental data efficiency & generalization gains, but it won't fix the fundamental issues of the parametric learning paradigm.

English
14
12
82
12.8K
LAMM@MIT retweetledi
Markus J. Buehler
Markus J. Buehler@ProfBuehlerMIT·
Scientific discovery is reaching the limits of human capacity: too much data, too many disconnected fields, and too few ways to connect ideas fast enough to matter. The next breakthroughs in materials, medicine, energy, and beyond will not come from scaling today’s AI paradigm alone or from relying on serendipity alone. They will require a new kind of AI for knowledge discovery that not only models the world but shapes what it could become. At Unreasonable Labs, we are building superintelligence for knowledge discovery: systems that reason across disciplines, generate novel hypotheses, test them through simulation and experimentation, and help guide real-world discovery. Our AI engine is not confined to what it has seen in training. It creates new data, builds new tools, and maintains a persistent world model that grows more powerful as it reasons. Why now? Even today's most powerful AI models face a core limitation: they are trained on what we already know. True discovery begins when a system encounters something its current model cannot explain. This is why you cannot train your way to a discovery - a system has to reason through new problems, update its beliefs, and revise its understanding of the world as it thinks. Another critical insight is that rich knowledge already exists, but is not yet applied to solve pressing problems. It sits in millions of papers, patents, and datasets, trapped in isolated silos, often in legacy data vaults. What's missing is a way to connect it, scale it, unlock the potential, and synthesize genuine novel predictions. The time is now to build a system that enables practitioners to design, explore, and direct discovery, whether through human guidance or full automation, while capturing the tacit insight that domain experts bring. Steerable reasoning That is why we built an operating system for scientific discovery - one that replaces chance with steerable reasoning. Rather than retrieving static facts, our AI builds and continuously updates a living world model - a representation of knowledge the system can actively reason over, question, and revise. A concrete example: say you want to create "smart concrete" that can flex - a concept that doesn't exist yet. Our AI maps relationships across domains, finds a path from morphable smart materials to concrete, and identifies the most efficient way to bridge those concepts. It then autonomously writes simulations, tests the hypothesis, and refines the idea. Then it interacts with hardware to produce a physical artifact, and the loop expands into the real-world, where the machine becomes world-shaping. Our AI gives users full visibility into how the system arrived at a conclusion. It delineates which existing patents and papers it drew upon versus what is genuinely new - protecting IP and competitive concerns from the start, and offering deep compositional insights into technology advances. It takes unreasonable people to make progress Our team reflects the interdisciplinary expertise required to build this next breakthrough - my co-founder Yuan Cao @caoyuan33 (formerly DeepMind) and Andrew Lew, @HaiqianYang, Matt Insler, Jennifer Kang and Julia McLaughlin. We are backed by $13.5M in seed funding led by @PlaygroundVC with participation from @aixventures, @e14fund, and MS&AD. We are guided by advisors including Robert Langer (1,000+ patents), Kostya Novoselov (Nobel Prize in Physics), and @Thom_Wolf (Co-founder of Hugging Face). We already have multiple pilot programs underway with leading industrial partners in materials science and engineering, with additional engagements developing across energy, logistics, bioengineering, and other strategic domains. The biggest challenges of our time - fusion energy, sustainable materials, new medicines - demand exponentially more innovation than humans alone can produce. We are not replacing scientists, and instead are making every scientist capable of leading their own team of AI-powered researchers. Abundant innovation leads to abundant prosperity. Watch our launch video below to see what we're building @unreasonable_ai 👇
English
57
71
369
51.9K
LAMM@MIT retweetledi
leslie sheppard
leslie sheppard@leslieasheppard·
“As AI reshapes every field, the ability to bridge machine intelligence and physical reality becomes critical. 🚨I think that building first-principles, physics-aware AI - and connecting it to the physical world - is an important frontier.” @ProfBuehlerMIT @unreasonable_ai
Markus J. Buehler@ProfBuehlerMIT

As AI reshapes every field, the ability to bridge machine intelligence and physical reality becomes critical. I think that building first-principles, physics-aware AI - and connecting it to the physical world - is an important frontier.

English
0
5
10
6.3K
LAMM@MIT retweetledi
Derya Unutmaz, MD
Derya Unutmaz, MD@DeryaTR_·
Very exciting venture from Markus on AI for scientific discovery! Great idea to develop superintelligence for discovery. I agree that what we are missing is the connection, the knowledge sets we have across fields are like treasures waiting to be uncovered. Big congratulations!
Markus J. Buehler@ProfBuehlerMIT

After decades at MIT studying how nature builds - from spider silk to bone to nacre - I've become convinced of something: the biggest barrier to scientific progress isn't knowledge, it's connection. The insights we need already exist, scattered across millions of papers and disciplines. They're just trapped in silos that no single human mind can bridge. That's why I co-founded Unreasonable Labs together with Yuan Cao: to build superintelligence for knowledge discovery. Today we're coming out of stealth with $13.5M in seed funding led by @PlaygroundGlobal, with participation from @aixventureshq, @e14fund, and MS&AD Ventures. We're building a system that doesn't just retrieve information but reasons across it - connecting disparate ideas to generate genuinely novel hypotheses grounded in physical reality. The genesis of Unreasonable itself came from the kind of serendipity we're trying to systematize. A chance encounter with a mathematician working on category theory became the theoretical bridge between language models and structured scientific reasoning - and ultimately the foundation for everything we're building. Our mission is to replace that serendipity with steerable reasoning, so that every scientist can make those leaps deliberately, not accidentally. I'm grateful to our advisors - Kostya Novoselov, Robert Langer, and @Thom_Wolf - and to the extraordinary team making this possible. We're not building AI that replaces scientists. We're building AI that lets them solve in weeks what used to take years. The future is abundant innovation. Let's build it.

English
4
9
54
9.9K