Invariant Perspective

147K posts

Invariant Perspective banner
Invariant Perspective

Invariant Perspective

@InvariantPersp1

What are the inviolable constraints on the Global Financial Markets and the Global Economy?

Beigetreten Mart 2019
7K Folgt5.8K Follower
Invariant Perspective retweetet
zerohedge
zerohedge@zerohedge·
Record high on negative breadth
zerohedge tweet media
English
25
77
465
74.5K
Invariant Perspective retweetet
Alec Stapp
Alec Stapp@AlecStapp·
Here’s the one chart that shows Jensen is lying about the AI compute balance between the US and China. When measured on an apples-to-apples basis, China’s domestic production is tiny compared to the amount of compute they could access if we sell them NVIDIA chips.
Alec Stapp tweet media
Dwarkesh Patel@dwarkesh_sp

Distilled recap of the back-and-forth with Jensen on export controls: Dwarkesh: Wouldn’t selling Nvidia chips to China enable them to train models like Claude Mythos with cyber offensive capabilities that would be threats to American companies and national security? Jensen: First of all, Mythos was trained on fairly mundane capacity and a fairly mundane amount of it by an extraordinary company. The amount of capacity and the type of compute it was trained on is abundantly available in China. Dwarkesh: With that, could they eventually train a model like Mythos? Yes. But the question is, because we have more FLOPs, American labs are able to get to this level of capabilities first. Furthermore, even if they trained a model like this, the ability to deploy it at scale matters. If you had a cyber hacker, it's much more dangerous if they have a million of them versus a thousand of them. Jensen: Your premise is just wrong. The fact of the matter is their AI development is going just fine. The best AI researchers in the world, because they are limited in compute, also come up with extremely smart algorithms. DeepSeek is not an inconsequential advance. The day that DeepSeek comes out on Huawei first, that is a horrible outcome for our nation. Dwarkesh: Currently, you can have a model like DeepSeek that can run on any accelerator if it's open source. Why would that stop being the case in the future? Jensen: Suppose it optimizes for Huawei. Suppose it optimizes for their architecture. It would put others at a disadvantage. As AI diffuses out into the rest of the world, their standards and their tech stack will become superior to ours because their models are open. Dwarkesh: Tesla sold extremely good electric vehicles to China for a long time. iPhones are sold in China. They didn't cause some lock-in. China will still make their version of EVs, and they're dominating, or smartphones, they're dominating. Jensen: We are not a car. The fact that I can buy this car brand one day and use another car brand another day is easy. Computing is not like that. There's a reason why x86 still exists. There's a reason why Arm is so sticky. These ecosystems are hard to replace. Dwarkesh: It's just hard to imagine that there's a long-term lock-in to the Chinese ecosystem, even if they have this slightly better open-source model for a while. American labs port across accelerators constantly. Anthropic's models are run on GPUs, they're run on Trainium, they're run on TPUs. There are so many things you can do, from distilling to a model that's well fit for your chips. Jensen: China is the largest contributor to open source software in the world. China's the largest contributor to open models in the world. Today it's built on the American tech stack, Nvidia’s. Fact. All five layers of the tech stack for AI are important. The United States ought to go win all five of them. in a few years time, I'm making you the prediction that when we want American technology to be diffused around the world—out to India, out to the Middle East, out to Africa, out to Southeast Asia—on that day, I will tell you exactly about today's conversation, about how your policy ... caused the United States to concede the second largest market in the world for no good reason at all.

English
7
25
189
15.1K
Invariant Perspective retweetet
John Nosta
John Nosta@JohnNosta·
AI and the 10-Minute Mind 🕑Ten minutes of AI use erodes results and persistence. 🕑Borrowed certainty feels like understanding but costs us the struggle that builds it. 🕑The mind that never stumbles doesn't grow—it just waits for the next answer. psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-di…
John Nosta tweet media
English
3
5
10
464
Invariant Perspective retweetet
Select Committee on China
A Chinese firm, MizarVision, posted detailed satellite imagery of U.S. forces in the Middle East while not disclosing its data sources. @ChinaSelect analysis found @AirbusSpace satellites had multiple daily windows, up to 10 hours, where they could have captured imagery of U.S. troop positions before the Iran conflict. That imagery later appeared online via a China-based AI company. "These documented facts present a troubling scenario: 1. A Chinese firm with undisclosed satellite sourcing published precise, annotated imagery of U.S. military assets at a specific base. 2. That imagery identified the exact aircraft types that were subsequently destroyed in a precise Iranian strike. 3. A technical analysis suggests Airbus Space satellites were the most plausible sources for that imagery,” concludes Chairman @RepMoolenaar. chinaselectcommittee.house.gov/media/press-re…
Select Committee on China tweet media
English
23
159
475
42K
Invariant Perspective retweetet
Alec Stapp
Alec Stapp@AlecStapp·
This is the key moment between Jensen and Dwarkesh on export controls: 1. Dwarkesh asks why it’s okay to sell NVIDIA chips to China given the national security implications of AI models like Mythos. 2. Jensen gives a misleading answer, arguing that it’s okay to sell American chips to China because China already produces 60% of the world’s chips. 3. But as Jensen definitely knows, compute is measured in flops, not number of chips. 4. Dwarkesh then pushes back, pointing out that on a flops basis, China has 10% of the compute the US has, and giving them more compute would change their cyber capabilities. This exchange shows why it’s critically important for interviewers to have at least some technical knowledge, so they can push back against misleading talking points.
Alec Stapp tweet mediaAlec Stapp tweet media
Dwarkesh Patel@dwarkesh_sp

The Jensen Huang episode. 0:00:00 – Is Nvidia’s biggest moat its grip on scarce supply chains? 0:16:25 – Will TPUs break Nvidia’s hold on AI compute? 0:41:06 – Why doesn’t Nvidia become a hyperscaler? 0:57:36 – Should we be selling AI chips to China? 1:35:06 – Why doesn’t Nvidia make multiple different chip architectures? Look up Dwarkesh Podcast on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, etc. Enjoy!

English
34
144
1.1K
96.7K
Invariant Perspective retweetet
Mike McGlone
Mike McGlone@mikemcglone11·
Commodity Rally Set to Fade as Crude Oil Reverts: 2Q Outlook The Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index's roughly 23% gain in 2026 through April 15 looks increasingly tough to sustain. I expect the energy spike to reinforce the usual commodity cure for high prices: demand destruction, wealth reversion and supply incentives, particularly from the US. The energy crisis and technology that's replacing fossil fuels may pressure crude oil to follow falling US natural gas akin to 2022-23. Matched 1Q crude peaks in WTI and Brent near $120 a barrel might be as enduring as $130 in 2022. Crude and US gas have cleansed shorts within extended range-bound markets. Grain-price bounces could add to ample supplies, absent a US drought. Juxtaposed are the record-setting metals, which showed up-too-much inklings in 1Q, led by gold and silver -- moves that proved prescient ahead of the Iran war. Full report on the Bloomberg here: blinks.bloomberg.com/news/stories/t… {BI COMD} #crudeoil #naturalgas #gold #copper #corn #commodities @BBGIntelligence
Mike McGlone tweet media
English
2
3
13
2.4K
Invariant Perspective retweetet
PlungeProtectionTeam
PlungeProtectionTeam@gamesblazer06·
Large Banks have reported this week…. Bank Capital is down big…. Sheets are Overextended… Bank Commentary from Large GSIBs has been downright giddy.
English
2
8
32
2.5K
Invariant Perspective retweetet
Trevor Noren
Trevor Noren@trevornoren·
Bloomberg: "'If you're worried about direct lending at all, you've got to be really worried about PE'...If the leveraged buyouts [private credit managers] financed do get into difficulties because of competition from artificial intelligence, the private equity owners are first in line to lose money." COVID-era excessive enthusiasm was the culmination of a decade in which private market AUM growth tripled and a lack mark-to-market accountability enabled suspension of disbelief. As I wrote in my October report on "The Retailization of Private Markets" (sample here: sageroadresearch.com/products/the-r…): "In one form or another, we came across this quote repeatedly researching this report: “Many private equity players have raised their last fund, they just don’t realize it yet.” Arguably, this is the most challenging downcycle in the industry’s history. According PWC estimates from June, PE firms have roughly $3 trillion invested in 30,000 companies and in a typical M&A cycle, $1 trillion would have already been put back into the market. With under $900 billion in exits so far this year, the industry is still far below the $1.5 trillion annual exit run rate pace that would be required to truly begin unwinding its $3 trillion asset pile. Distribution challenges have sapped fundraising. Currently, more than 18,000 private capital funds are seeking $3.3 trillion, according to Bain. Through the first half of 2025, PE funds worldwide had secured just over $420 billion, according to S&P Global. Rapidly rising rates in 2022 and 2023 catalyzed the industry’s struggles. Excessive enthusiasm during the low-rate regime, peaking during the COVID years, is playing a major role in the severity of the downturn. Bloomberg published the following anecdote in September. It encapsulates the industry’s struggles broadly: 'When Insight Partners tried to raise another $20 billion flagship fund, it found itself offering mea culpas. Months into the campaign, the software-focused private equity firm conceded it had invested too quickly before interest rates rose, buying assets near a market peak. Executives vowed to focus on returning capital. But contrition wasn’t enough for some clients. Even after trimming ambitions to $12.5 billion from $15 billion for an era of fewer deals, the firm’s 13th fund closed in January with about $11.5 billion.'" Learn more about Sage Road Research: sageroadresearch.com. Interested in subscribing? Message me. Bloomberg link: bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
Trevor Noren tweet media
English
1
11
45
3.8K
Invariant Perspective retweetet
Zineb Riboua
Zineb Riboua@zriboua·
My assessment: The IRGC ran through every option. Set markets on edge, no effect. Pressed Gulf states, no shift. Threatened Hormuz, unsustainable as it threatens China as well. Leaned on proxies, limited impact. The deeper issue lies in their reading of the moment. For years, they operated against U.S. administrations that tolerated delay and kept negotiations alive. Even under Joe Biden, with concessions and attempts to revive the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, there remained room to maneuver. Every single time a U.S. president tried to leave the Middle East or stabilize it so that others take care of their own security, the U.S. gets even more involved given how it never really gets to the bottom of it: an agressive Islamic Republic with proxies across the region. They now face Trump, who shortens timelines and prioritizes closure. The objective centers on ending the file and reducing U.S. exposure in the region. In that setting, delay offers no advantage to IRGC. In their minds, time buys survival, but it narrows drastically their options as Trump weakens them, hits their command and control, humiliates them, and tightens their economic margins as well. They have no other choice.
English
59
251
1.5K
78.6K
Invariant Perspective retweetet
PlungeProtectionTeam
PlungeProtectionTeam@gamesblazer06·
The Vol Regime has totally changed since the beginning of 4Q25…. Bank LCRs hovering around their Cycle Lows Now with War Inflation that’s gonna linger Fed Balance Sheet Expansion remains difficult in 2026 until further Demand is Destroyed.
PlungeProtectionTeam tweet media
English
0
2
9
2.7K
Invariant Perspective retweetet
Invariant Perspective retweetet
Mr. VIX
Mr. VIX@yieldsearcher·
Somebody pls help me reconcile these with recent strong Fed manufacturing survey datas.
Mr. VIX tweet media
English
4
6
26
2.7K
Invariant Perspective retweetet
Invariant Perspective retweetet
Lisa Abramowicz
Lisa Abramowicz@lisaabramowicz1·
"US corporate profits have been growing faster than the domestic economy since the year 2000. The relationship between the two sits at/near record highs:" @DataTrekMB Meanwhile, "American workers’ share of economic activity has been declining rapidly over the same timeframe"
Lisa Abramowicz tweet media
English
31
99
279
24.6K
Invariant Perspective retweetet
Izabella Kaminska
Izabella Kaminska@izakaminska·
Some 15% of US IG debt is now tied to issuers involved in AI Capex (chart via Muzinich & Co)
Izabella Kaminska tweet media
English
0
5
19
2.1K
Invariant Perspective retweetet
Justine Bateman
Justine Bateman@JustineBateman·
Lol, the shoot was only 20 days long in some grey room, with all the “locations” being added via AI after, and it still cost them $70m? True lol. Where’s the supposed cost savings of AI use? All they did was make a film with inauthentic backgrounds for more money than it would have cost to actually travel to shoot.
No Film School@nofilmschool

Doug Liman just wrapped what could be the first fully AI-generated studio film. nofilmschool.com/doug-liman-ai-…

English
65
51
606
27.2K