David van Moorsel

492 posts

David van Moorsel banner
David van Moorsel

David van Moorsel

@Law_Flows

Virtual Business lawyer with All In Business Law. Incorporations through https://t.co/cMOizperUj.

Alberta, Canada Beigetreten Kasım 2012
849 Folgt253 Follower
David van Moorsel
David van Moorsel@Law_Flows·
@BitGrateful Don't know. I would never choose not to strip it. I value my clients' privacy as much as my own.
English
1
0
1
53
Lawyered
Lawyered@BitGrateful·
@Law_Flows How much time added vs not stripping it? 100%?
English
2
0
0
192
David van Moorsel
David van Moorsel@Law_Flows·
@BitGrateful None of these PII stripping services are 100% effective. You still need a human review step at the end, but it can definitely save a lot of time by completing the first 95% or so. It's a significant time saver over the manual process.
English
4
0
3
212
John Tomkinson
John Tomkinson@johnwtomkinson·
In the Alberta Independence debate between @ikwilson and @jkenney, Jason gets it wrong again. On the imbalance of representation in the HOC, Jason claims rural Albertans are over represented. I live in a riding where there are 209,431 constituents represented by @MikeLakeMP. There are other federal ridings out east with only 26,655 constituents! Thats nearly 10:1 voter representation depreciation. Hard to defend federalism when your facts are wrong. On October 19, vote for freedom. #AlbertaIndependence
John Tomkinson tweet mediaJohn Tomkinson tweet media
English
37
119
326
11K
Declan Regan
Declan Regan@mrdeclanregan·
@johnwtomkinson @ikwilson @jkenney @MikeLakeMP You realize that riding no longer exists and they redistributed that riding because it grew too fast and replaced it with Leduc-Wetaskwin? That’s how ridings work, sometimes they grow too quickly then they change them to better reflect the population. Literally the system worked
English
2
0
4
78
David van Moorsel
David van Moorsel@Law_Flows·
@bruce_mcgonigal It's odd that you're blaming Mark Carney for a decision that Danielle Smith made. She specifically chose to make the question about a question. It's intentionally unclear. If you think that meets the requirements of the Clarity Act, then perhaps you should try reading it.
English
0
0
0
71
Bruce McGonigal
Bruce McGonigal@bruce_mcgonigal·
🤡🤡🤡🤡 : Mark Carney said having a question about a question, put to a vote, is not legally binding in Canada and doesn't require the Clarity Act. 🖊️ Albertans were told they needed to collect enough signatures to have a referendum on staying in, or leaving Canada. 📜 Hundreds of thousands of Albertans took the time to sign a petition to have a legally binding referendum on Alberta separation from Canada. 🗳️ They met the required threshold to have the vote they wanted. But are now told one will not happen but they can have a vote, to see if they want a vote. 🇨🇦 We keep being told Albertans overwhelmingly want to stay in Canada. So why not have the vote then? If it sounds retarded, it's because it is retarded. On par for the course for Canada, where men get pregnant and kids needs taxpayer funded snorting kits. What a retarded society.
English
23
32
149
10.3K
David van Moorsel retweetet
Ann Srivastava
Ann Srivastava@helloparalegal·
"I built Harvey and Legora in two weeks with Claude and made it open-source." That's the pitch on Mike (mikeoss.com). I haven't tested the code. I won't pretend I have. But this is the structural inevitability worth paying attention to: when the moat is a UI on top of an LLM, someone will eventually rebuild it on a Saturday. The lawyers who matter in 2026 won't be on Harvey. They won't be on Mike either. They'll be running their own agents, configured to their own workflow, on Commercial Terms API. The vendors are racing the open-source clones. The future of legal AI isn't a product. It's a workflow you own.
WillC@willchen500

Harvey is valued at $11B. Legora just raised at $5.5B. I built their entire web application in two weeks and I'm making it open-source and free for everyone to use. Say hi to Mike: mikeoss.com. When I got the chance to try Harvey and Legora, I was surprised by how simple they were. A thought came to mind: I could probably build something similar in no time at all with Claude. And so I did. Assistant, project, tabular review and workflows. You get it all without vendor lock-in. Mike offers law firms an alternative, where they own the application layer and aren't stuck with a vendor they're renewing forever. You can try Mike in the demo on the website, or go to the GitHub link on the site to download the code and run a local version yourself.

English
25
9
194
59.5K
David van Moorsel
David van Moorsel@Law_Flows·
@LilPork07 @funtomvids Did he buy those stocks before or after he became PM? Did he make the decision personally, or was it an investment advisor? What decisions were made for his benefit, and what was his involvement in those decisions? I'd happily look at that sort of evidence if you have it.
English
0
0
0
13
LILPORK
LILPORK@LilPork07·
@Law_Flows @funtomvids Sir he’s the PM of Canada not a banker. The stock he hold definitely matters because he’s enriching himself with the influence and decision he’s making. It’s public available data everyone has access to im literally showing you the proof of wrongdoing and corruption.
LILPORK tweet mediaLILPORK tweet mediaLILPORK tweet media
English
2
0
2
45
Fun Tom 🇨🇦 💂
Fun Tom 🇨🇦 💂@funtomvids·
🟥 WHY?? ▪️ Why is it that all of Poilievre's "influencers" are such terrible actors and disingenuous proxies? ▪️ Why is it that many of them have ties to Russia? ▪️ Why does he choose hollow gongs like Kat Kanada to carry his messages, while giving them a misinformation platform to attack REAL, widely-respected journalists like Andrew Coyne? ▪️ Why is it that whenever Poilievre is asked a question - he gives, snotty, arrogant and unprofessional answers? ▪️ Why does he double down on defending Donald Trump who is trying to destroy our economy and Canadian jobs? ▪️ Where is Pierre's security clearance? This chap is severely unqualified to be anywhere NEAR the Prime Minister's office. 🤦🏻‍♂️ #LeadershipMatters
English
297
321
1.3K
50.7K
David van Moorsel
David van Moorsel@Law_Flows·
@LilPork07 @funtomvids That is not proof my friend. You are suggesting that he's done something improper, just by showing that he has investments and knows lots of people in Canada. That's evidence he had a successful career outside of politics, not "proof" that he's corrupt.....
English
1
0
0
33
David van Moorsel
David van Moorsel@Law_Flows·
@LilPork07 @funtomvids I'm open to reviewing actual evidence if you have any, but the fact that a former investment banker holds a wide range of investments shouldn't be surprising to you. It certainly isn't proof of wrongdoing or corruption.
English
1
0
2
44
LILPORK
LILPORK@LilPork07·
@funtomvids WHY don’t you ever put the same efforts towards Carney and hold him accountable? WHY? We have 100% verified undeniable accurate proof don’t you want to look at it?
LILPORK tweet mediaLILPORK tweet media
English
6
1
27
947
Jordan Urbs
Jordan Urbs@jordanurbs·
I have 3 guest passes to Claude Code (1-week free) I want to raffle these off along with a free lifetime subscription to my Skool community, AI Captains If you're new(ish) to AI agents and wish to upgrade your tech skills, this is your opportunity Drop a reply and RT to enter
Jordan Urbs tweet media
English
6
4
5
854
David van Moorsel
David van Moorsel@Law_Flows·
@TeamYouTube Videos have not been posted on the channel for at least 2 years. It has barely been used. I have no idea what the channel URL is. That's part of the problem. I can't see anything when I log in other than the cancellation notice. The username is @allinbusinesslaw if that helps.
English
14
0
0
47
TeamYouTube
TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube·
@Law_Flows So sorry you're going through this. Let us know your channel URL & we'll see what we can do
English
1
0
0
28
David van Moorsel
David van Moorsel@Law_Flows·
@TeamYouTube I'm trying to get some help with the removal of our channel. I can't seem to get support anywhere, or even an explanation of what happened. My emails are not responded to and none of the troubleshooting steps work. Are you able to help?
English
20
0
1
95
David van Moorsel
David van Moorsel@Law_Flows·
@TeamYouTube The only explanation I have is that the channel was hacked, which would be pretty damn important for me to know, but I can't even log in to see what was posted. It's pretty frustrating to lose a channel with no explanation and no one to even contact to get an answer. (3/3)
English
19
0
0
104
TeamYouTube
TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube·
@Law_Flows The first step here is to appeal, which sends your channel directly to our policy team & they'll follow up w/ you over email. You can appeal in Studio or via this form: goo.gle/3QY69Nj You can also view your appeal confirmation & anticipated review time in Studio (2/2)
English
3
0
0
42
David van Moorsel
David van Moorsel@Law_Flows·
@TeamYouTube The channel had a couple of videos posted years ago. They were made by me and had no copyright infringing material. I have no idea what the issue was, and YouTube hasn't told me anything that would clarify. (2/3)
English
0
0
0
27
David van Moorsel
David van Moorsel@Law_Flows·
@TeamYouTube The only information provided was that the channel breached the community guidelines. No warnings or specifics were provided. I already appealed and asked for specifics, but none were given. It was just a statement that the appeal was rejected with no explanation as to why. (1/3)
English
2
0
0
20