Moonboy.hl

@prjx_buddy @prjx_hl Wen TGE…

25 million dollars rewarded to the prjx community is kinda amazing tbf lpers bullish on the eco and on @prjx_hl get rewarded sometimes we gotta take a step back thats 25m of cold hard digital cash. not vaporware. prjx is community driven and always will be so much higher

USDH has reached an all-time high of $100M supply on Hyperliquid.

@NostalgicHubb Spain

Only smart ones will get this right

SAM BANKMAN FRIED PICKED EVERY WINNER OF THE 2020s AND HIS LAWYERS SOLD THEM ALL AT THE BOTTOM. If the FTX estate hadn't panic-sold its assets during bankruptcy, SBF would be sitting on a $114 billion empire today. Instead, he is watching the greatest trades of the decade from a prison cell. The data is almost impossible to believe: - Anthropic: $82.3 billion (165x) SBF bought an 8% stake for $500M. The estate sold it for $1.3B in 2024. Today, that stake would be worth over $80B. - SpaceX:$15 billion (75x) A massive stake liquidated early to pay creditors. - Solana: $5.1 billion (27x) SBF was an early backer at $8. The estate offloaded a massive chunk at $64. - Robinhood: $4.9 billion (8x) - Genesis Digital: $3.5 billion (3x) The Latest "Missed" Fortune: CURSOR In 2022, Alameda Research wrote a tiny $200,000 check for a 5% stake in the AI startup Cursor. In April 2023, the bankruptcy estate sold that entire stake back for exactly what they paid: $200,000. Yesterday, SpaceX announced a deal to buy Cursor for $60 billion. That "worthless" 5% stake would be worth $3 billion today. That is a 15,000x return that vanished because the lawyers wanted a quick exit. SBF was a genius at picking generational winners and a criminal at managing their money. The lawyers recovered $18 billion for users. If they had just held, they would be sitting on $114 billion and the most valuable venture portfolio in history.

I read it like: Witkoff’s recent tweet is a desperate attempt to deflect attention from his garbage $WLFI proposal to his claimed Justin’s “misconduct” 🤷

@ZachWitkoff @worldlibertyfi Idc what he did, but apparently Justin has the point, and WLFI team is apparently fucking with early investors. How the fuck can vote No to garbage proposal will get voter punished?! Is this even voting then? How is this legal? It’s more like a scam

Justin Sun’s recent lawsuit against @worldlibertyfi is a desperate attempt to deflect attention from Sun’s own misconduct.  His claims are entirely meritless, and World Liberty looks forward to getting the case thrown out promptly. He engaged in misconduct that required World Liberty to take action to protect itself and its users.  World Liberty will continue to take all necessary steps to protect its community.

Today, I filed a lawsuit in California federal court against World Liberty Financial to protect my legal rights as a holder of $WLFI tokens.   I have always been—and remain—an ardent supporter of President Trump and his Administration’s efforts to make America crypto friendly.  This lawsuit does not change how I feel about President Trump or the Trump Administration.   Unfortunately, certain individuals on the World Liberty project team have been operating the project in a manner that goes against President Trump’s values.  They wrongfully froze all of my tokens, stripped me of my right to vote on governance proposals, and have threatened to permanently destroy my tokens by “burning” them—all without any proper justification.  I do not believe President Trump would condone these actions if he knew about them.     I have tried in good faith to resolve this situation with the World Liberty project team without resorting to litigation.  But the project team has refused my requests to unfreeze my tokens and restore my rights as a token holder.  They have left me with no choice but to turn to the courts.  All I want is to be treated the same as every other early investor who received tokens—no better, no worse.    I also want the community to know that I strongly oppose the new governance proposal World Liberty published on April 15.   If it passes, token holders who do not “affirmatively accept” its terms—including a requirement that 10% of all advisor tokens be permanently burned—will have their tokens locked indefinitely.  For early purchaser tokens, the proposal imposes a two-year cliff followed by a two-year vesting schedule—and again, for those who do not affirmatively accept, their tokens are locked indefinitely.   This proposal is bad for the community, but because World Liberty has frozen my early investor tokens, I cannot vote them for or against the proposal.   I believe in fairness, transparency, and the principles that make crypto powerful.  I will continue to fight for those principles. 🙏

I saw people posting about depositing funds directly from Hyperliquid to IBKR using USDH, I thought it will be jumping through 10 hoops. I linked it up in 10 mins (which a qn to @fiege_max which he responded really quickly), send a test tx, and received funds in IBKR the same day. Previously, I was swapping it back to SGD to off ramp, and depositing to IBKR. Now I just skip the bank completely. NM handles that.

Fee only pools are deployed! 7.5% goes to the protocol, 92.5% to users. Dynamic fees are enabled just like the other pools. Kittenswap😼

Hyperliquid entered the Congressional record for the first time today. @ChairmanSelig testified before the House Agriculture Committee and received a question about "decentralized exchanges like Hyperliquid." He said: "[O]ur goal is always going to be to onshore those markets and to have the markets subject to our regulation here in the United States and accessible to our U.S. persons here in the U.S. ..." We appreciate Chairman Selig's commitment to ensuring Americans can benefit from decentralized markets. It will take some effort to adapt the commodities laws, but we're confident this CFTC and its capable staff are up to the task.

$1B+ trading volume 4,000+ traders $5M+ daily volume in beta and it’s built directly on top of Hyperliquid’s order book pair trading just became the most capital efficient trade on chain Thanks to @pear_protocol

@cryptolala @Lighter_xyz used to trade on lighter but actually took time to compare execution prices lighter is worse even with 0 fees as they fill you on a worse price

I don’t get why people aren’t using @Lighter_xyz unless they’re trading multi-million positions; there’s no real reason to use HL

@Henrik_on_HL When there is no fees, spread is/will be the hidden fee

Fees on Hyperliquid are insanely high

@satoshiheist @Henrik_on_HL Spread is the real fee

@Henrik_on_HL No fees on Lighter 🕯️

@prjx_buddy Wen TGE

turn your HYPE into a yield machine LPs collecting fees nonstop +90k past 24h

@0xNessus gLend! looking forward to your next talk with 1000+ people🍺

A year ago I spoke to a room of around 100 people about Hyperliquid and HyperLend. A lot has happened since. Thank you to those who were listening.

🇺🇸 JUST IN: SEC says certain crypto interfaces, including DeFi front-ends, wallet extensions, and apps, may operate without broker-dealer registration under conditions: • No custody of user funds (self-custodial only) • No investment advice or recommendations • No order routing or execution • Fixed, neutral fee structures only • No discretion over transactions or market activity

@hyperbulla @pear_protocol gPear

long hype / short mon hyperliquid

Polymarket takes 2% on wins, Kalshi 7% Hyperliquid HIP-4: basically free to open, only 4-7 bps when you close. $1M winning trade = $20k fees vs $400–700 That alone is huge, but the real killer is cross-margining: perps + prediction markets all share the same collateral in one account. Instant hedges, no transfers, way better capital efficiency HIP-4 markets are about to eat everyone’s lunch

@Herbertonic @infinitybanyan 3-day bear divergence😂

@infinitybanyan Wtf is a 3d bear div

Mmm $hype just printed a 3D bear div on declining volume. Not loving it but we’ll see