Simon

@rezzyman @0x_kaize It ain’t, I prefer it over Opus 4.7 It’s also miles better than gpt 5.5 xhigh

@0x_kaize GLM seems bench-maxed tho. I’ll give it a go this week and see.

after my agent testing, GLM 5.2 is better than Opus-4.8. It is closer to Fable level - at coding my leaderboard: Fable > GLM 5.2 > Kimi-2.7 > Opus 4.8 > GPT5.5 > Minimax

@J3_Trades Which prop is it? Curious. Have you gotten payouts with em yet?

If you haven’t won a evaluation from me before raise your hand 🙋🏼‍♂️ End of the day someone is getting a 100k

@flexxtrades @TradingLucid Just blow your accounts after a few payouts and get new ones

what is @TradingLucid live, can someone explain, what happens to my existing balance do I get paid out or do I go fully live im confused

@Benjamin_SMC I have a flamingo in my backyard

i’ve never lost a trade in my entire life.

Been using @Plasma daily for a while now. Had a few minor issues before, but most of them seem fixed now. Honestly feels cleaner and simpler than Revolut and most other banks/cards I’ve used. Card tiers are coming this week too. Bullish on $XPL. Got 1 invite code left. DM me.

@Zyra_exe @k_spiros7 @hqmank Well genuienly say how it's good, the front end capabilities are years behind gpt 5.5 xhigh right now. Worst thing is, GPT is bad at front end... but better than glm

@SimonFXpert @k_spiros7 @hqmank no way GLM all the way

Wait, GLM 5.2 is really good, but I didn’t expect it to hit #1. Has anyone tested it on real coding or agent tasks yet?

@k_spiros7 @hqmank I closed it, gay model

@SimonFXpert @hqmank I haven't tested it on backend yet, but if you have, is it better than the previous generation?

@k_spiros7 @hqmank Yeah right? I remember GLM 5.1 good at front end but like damn 5.2 is horrible. Kimi etc is miles better

@SimonFXpert @hqmank Wasn't like glm 5.1 way better at frontend stuff, even glm 5.0 . This release was very disappointing for me.

@hqmank Yeah well, tbh i always come back at gpt 5.5 xhigh no matter what i try. No idea if GLM 5.2 is good at backend, but as of now i remember 5.1 better. Not sure if i'm braindead

@SimonFXpert I tested it too. It still feels behind Opus to me. For simple tasks it should be fine

@0xOPgg_ @xplaceapp @ether_fi @KASTxyz @Plasma Just be aware, all customer funds was lost not long ago.

@xplaceapp @ether_fi @KASTxyz @Plasma interesting. let me check

crypto cards are starting to pick their lane @ether_fi Cash feels made for people already running serious DeFi activity @KASTxyz is leaning into the premium card crowd → paid tiers → USD cashback → better card flex @Plasma One is the one i keep coming back to because the product feels practical → load stablecoins → spend with the card → see cashback come back in XPL i’ve tested it on actual purchases and that matters more to me than a tier table alone perks get attention. repeat usage proves the card.

@pauliepunt Absolutely bullish. Didn’t know plasma had a proper office, thought it was a smaller team working from home. Makes me more bullish, can’t wait for plasma Platinum🥂

Grateful doesn’t even describe how I feel to be a part of this team. Sometimes I question how I lucked into working at Plasma and getting to be a part of this for a living.

@Plasma Amazing!

Building Plasma One. Coming soon.

@nahid_pro09 @Marktechpost Just go try it, it’s good.

@Marktechpost the +21.8% gain is huge cant wait to try K2.7-Code

Moonshot AI Releases Kimi K2.7-Code: a Coding Model Reporting +21.8% on Kimi Code Bench v2 Over K2.6 Here's what's actually in it. 1. It's a coding-focused model built on Mixture-of-Experts, 1T total parameters, 32B active. 256K context window. Open weights under a Modified MIT license on Hugging Face. 2. The benchmark gains are over K2.6 (and company-reported)→ +21.8% on Kimi Code Bench v2 (50.9 → 62.0) → +11.0% on Program Bench → +31.5% on MLS Bench Lite 3. The efficiency number is the one I'd watch→ ~30% lower reasoning-token usage vs K2.6 Reasoning tokens bill as output. Across a long agent run, that compounds into real cost and latency. 4. Against the closed frontier, here's where it actually landsGPT-5.5 leads on all six rows. Claude Opus 4.8 leads on five. K2.7-Code beats Opus 4.8 on MCP Mark Verified (81.1 vs 76.4). 5. Pricing is low for high-volume runs→ $0.19 / 1M cached input → $0.95 / 1M cache-miss input → $4.00 / 1M output Full analysis: marktechpost.com/2026/06/12/moo… Kimi code: kimi.com/code?track_id=… API: platform.kimi.ai Model weight: huggingface.co/moonshotai/Kim… @Kimi_Moonshot

@DrElectronX @aksheyd Using grok, haven’t tried composer yet

@SimonFXpert @aksheyd Are you using Composer 2.5? If you don’t state the model and the .md files you are using, you have no clue what you are doing.

Grok Build tip of the day: plugins! Plugins contain any combination of skills, agents, MCPs, and hooks, incredibly powerful harness extensions. Install your first one from /marketplace! The Grok Build team shares an "on-call" plugin loaded with observability skills and MCPs, equipping Grok with the tools of an entire SRE team.

@Chris_Wozniczek @jahooma Selling data & advertisements ig. The models are free in there

@jahooma quick question, does this work in such way that you just need to connect your api keys from various platforms, and the actual tool is free? how does this work and what is 'free' there?😉 looking for where's the catch 😄

Our free coding agent used 124 billion tokens of DeepSeek V4 Pro in May. That's a lot! In 11 days of June, it's already used 184 billion 🤯 Try it free: npm i -g freebuff

@jeazous You can literally withdraw the cashback the second it gets paid out🫩

They’re dropping tiers (Platinum/Core/Lite) while $XPL is down 96% from ATH. Cashback in a crashed token. Gated AI subs you can buy cheaper yourself.

@kay00nee Platinum 🍻

What tier are you choosing?

@simonthekid_ @river0x 100000 XPL locked, around 6-7k

@river0x Any info on how much platinum will cost? 👀

Plasma's vision on the next revolution of money, with Platinum leading it. Next week.