Eric Tailor

5K posts

Eric Tailor banner
Eric Tailor

Eric Tailor

@ToolTimeTailor

Human

Beigetreten Eylül 2016
237 Folgt266 Follower
Overton
Overton@overton_news·
Joe Rogan tells Theo Von to his face he’s “losing his f*cking marbles” during the latest episode of the podcast. Rogan then urged him to get off antidepressants after Von went on a bizarre rant. VON: “It’s all just a cat and mouse game.” “People are like, ‘we’ll elect the Democrats next time.’ But it’s all...the same sh*t has been happening forever.” “They haven’t been helping anybody forever.” “They’re letting f*cking politicians slurp on kids!” “All of our f*cking money goes to Israel and they’re using it to f*cking genocide people!” “It’s like, everybody is scared out of their wits right now. It’s like, our religious leaders are afraid to speak out.” “It’s like...the...it’s a time where it’s like...satan is amongst us and our religious leaders are talking about bullsh*t at the polls!” “It’s just like, what is going...I don’t know man.” ROGAN: “We gotta get you off those antidepressants, son.” “You’re losing your f*cking marbles!” VON: “You think I am?” ROGAN: “Come hang out with us. Just chill out!”
English
2.4K
1.3K
19.7K
3.5M
Eric Tailor
Eric Tailor@ToolTimeTailor·
@johngalt_shrugs @overton_news That’s the part you can see in direct payment. Nevermind the defense spending to protect ourselves from Israel’s enemies, or to preemptively bomb them. Then consider how much money and time our government spends fighting “antisemitism” and going to AIPAC fundraisers, etc.
English
0
0
0
15
John Galt
John Galt@johngalt_shrugs·
"All of our fucking money goes to Israel." Let's fact check. Historically, we have "given" (more on that below) $3.8 billion/year to Israel, out of $5.2 trillion in income -- less than 1/10 of 1% of our money. Nowhere NEAR "all of our money." And the claim that we "give" it is grossly misleading. They're required to spend that money on U.S. defense companies that employ American workers. They then use those products in combat, thereby providing valuable and irreplaceable battlefield testing. They also share intelligence, which they are exceptionally skilled at doing. The economics are such that we probably gain more from the arrangement than Israel does.
English
216
16
326
46.3K
Eric Tailor
Eric Tailor@ToolTimeTailor·
@Mitch17334152 @benwehrman Physics 101. Force is mass x acceleration. And if an equal opposite force is applied, per Newtonian physics, you’ll move a large mass like a rocky quickly by moving exhaust out of it very quickly.
English
0
0
0
24
Mitch
Mitch@Mitch17334152·
@benwehrman I’m still want to know how they get thrust in a vacuum. Do the normal thrusters in atmosphere switch over to a vacuum system once they leave the atmosphere. Where is this point where atmosphere converts to the vacuum of space.?
English
18
0
8
1.8K
₿en Wehrman
₿en Wehrman@benwehrman·
A speeding sniper rifle bullet flies at around 1,700 MPH. NASA says their astronauts are zooming around the universe at 15 TIMES that speed. Just stop and think about this for a second. Visualize the speed of a sniper bullet. Now multiply that by FIFTEEN. Are you buying this?
English
169
187
902
49K
Eric Tailor
Eric Tailor@ToolTimeTailor·
@benwehrman Yes. What’s the problem? There’s no atmosphere, no drag in space. You can travel 100000x the speed of a bullet no problem as long as the acceleration doesn’t exceed what the human body can take.
English
0
0
0
4
Eric Tailor
Eric Tailor@ToolTimeTailor·
@Emilyaustin Three astronauts died a gruesome death because we weren’t cautious enough back then. We are more cautious now.
English
0
0
0
8
Emily Austin
Emily Austin@Emilyaustin·
Not trying to be conspiratorial at all, but I’m genuinely confused… if we already landed on the moon decades ago, why does going back now feel like such a massive, complicated mission? 🤔
English
274
15
260
23.4K
Eric Tailor
Eric Tailor@ToolTimeTailor·
@MarchandSurgery What we did back then really has nothing to do with what we can do now with completely different hardware. The risks are about the same. We just know now how dangerous the original Apollo system really was and try to do better now. That’s why things take even longer now.
English
0
0
1
33
Greg J. Marchand MD
Greg J. Marchand MD@MarchandSurgery·
If anything were to happen to the Artemis II astronauts on this mission, it would be an amazingly strong argument that the original lunar landing was fake, exonerating all skeptics. If we can't circle the moon 57 years later, we probably didn't land on it and get back in 1969.
English
243
14
183
17.2K
Eric Tailor
Eric Tailor@ToolTimeTailor·
@SternDrewCrypto Lol they won’t land on the moon because they can’t. The Blue Origin lander didn’t even get out of the vacuum chamber test until next week. Axiom hasn’t finished building the space suit. Y’all are the psyop.
English
0
0
0
184
Stern Drew
Stern Drew@SternDrewCrypto·
🚨 BREAKING: THE ARTEMIS LAUNCH IS THE DEEPEST COVER-UP YET. THEY ARE NOT GOING TO THE MOON. THEY ARE HIDING WHAT IS ALREADY THERE! 🚨 Yesterday's so-called historic Artemis II blast-off from Kennedy Space Center was not a triumphant return to the Moon after 50 plus years. It was Stage 2 of the greatest psyop in human history. They rolled out that bloated SLS rocket built with your tax dollars funneled through endless delays and cost overruns carrying four so-called heroes on a 10-day joyride. But ask yourself: Why no landing? Why just a quick lap around the Moon and back? Because they cannot risk showing you what is really on the lunar surface. The original Apollo missions? All filmed on a Hollywood soundstage. Van Allen radiation belts? Deadly. Flag waving in vacuum? Studio fans. No stars in the photos? Convenient lighting. Buzz Aldrin himself looked uncomfortable when pressed. Now they are rebooting the narrative with Artemis because the old lie is crumbling under scrutiny. This launch was pure theater: - Perfect timing right after years of technical issues and budget black holes. - Crew includes international players, Canadian astronaut and all, to make it look global while the real players pull strings from the shadows. - That convenient toilet fan glitch hours in? Classic distraction. Oh no, the billion-dollar potty broke! Meanwhile, the real payload, surveillance tech or alien artifact retrieval protocols, slips under the radar. Why now? Distraction from Earthly chaos. Keep the sheep cheering fireworks in the sky while the real power consolidates control over space narrative, resources, and the coming disclosure they will script themselves. The sheep are celebrating humanity's return. The awake see the strings. They faked it before. They are faking it better now. Question everything.
English
518
577
2.3K
615.1K
Eric Tailor
Eric Tailor@ToolTimeTailor·
@Ac7ionMann Why is it impossible? I can show you the math that proves you are wrong.
English
0
0
0
14
Eric Tailor
Eric Tailor@ToolTimeTailor·
@Treeclimbergabe @tweettruth2me Because this is a practice run for the next mission. This lets the astronauts, Mission Control, the engineers see how it’s going to go on game day. There will be 10000 changes to Artemis III and IV as a result of Artemis II.
English
1
0
0
38
Gabriel
Gabriel@Treeclimbergabe·
@tweettruth2me Even if you support a trip around the moon, why is it manned? Why risk lives? Everything is automated. You can make it smaller and cheaper. Cameras and videos are all you need, humans seeing it with their eyes do us no good.
English
4
0
1
83
Eric Tailor
Eric Tailor@ToolTimeTailor·
@tweettruth2me @BigTexJames NASA isn’t the problem. Congress and corporations are the ones turning this into a moondoggle. NASA is doing a good job with the tiny budget they have.
English
0
0
0
10
Eric Tailor
Eric Tailor@ToolTimeTailor·
@Tazerface16 @jeffkelehernb What are you talking about? Your prediction is about getting to orbit, not deorbiting. Clearly Starship can get to orbit if SpaceX wants it to.
English
0
0
4
175
Eric Tailor
Eric Tailor@ToolTimeTailor·
@anon8mous @Tazerface16 You don’t need a degree if you have experience. There’s very little I know with two Astronautical Engineering degrees that Elon doesn’t know.
English
1
0
3
531
V
V@anon8mous·
@Tazerface16 Elon Musk has a Bachelor of ARTS in physics, not science, but calls himself a physicist/engineer,😂. He has never done an experiment or set foot in laboratory his whole life. The guy steals credit & put his name on research papers/patents of his employees b/c he owns the company.
English
30
8
144
60.4K
Eric Tailor
Eric Tailor@ToolTimeTailor·
@TSharp12086 @NavyStrang We lost three great astronauts. Grissom, White, and Chaffee. Yes we will likely lose more astronauts in the future, after Apollo 1, Challenger, and Columbia, NASA changed risk posture. Our systems now are many times safer than the Apollo systems.
English
1
0
0
26
Timothy Sharp
Timothy Sharp@TSharp12086·
@ToolTimeTailor @NavyStrang I expect you are correct on their purpose. No lives were lost on the moon. And if anyone thinks there will be no more lives lost because there is better tech these days, Welllllllll. well
English
1
0
0
18
Eric Tailor
Eric Tailor@ToolTimeTailor·
@HighImpactFlix NASA didn’t have the budget to add a bunch of cabling, transmitters, and cameras. They could barely pull this off with minimum set of requirements. This rocket is years behind schedule and way over budget.
English
0
0
0
156
HighImpactFlix
HighImpactFlix@HighImpactFlix·
Holy Hell!! The Artemis 2 launch was PATHETIC and had horrible video feeds. They were better in the 1960s! How can this not be all by design? At least when Elon does a launch, there are multiple camera angles and it's entertaining. Even NASA's animation sucks!
English
595
307
4K
603K
Tom
Tom@ThomasRGolden·
@Helloimmorgan With as much as tech has advanced we should be piloting the starship enterprise at this point, but no we've regressed to just taking a ride around the moon.
English
5
0
4
1.2K
Morgan
Morgan@Helloimmorgan·
Why are they just going around the moon and not stepping on it…
English
497
16
369
39.8K
Eric Tailor
Eric Tailor@ToolTimeTailor·
@Helloimmorgan Because the landers and space suit aren’t ready yet, and we don’t want to wait. This is a practice run for the astronauts, Mission Control, and engineers who never did this before. Also, better to work out any kinks with SLS and Orion before we commit our people to the surface.
English
0
0
0
3
Eric Tailor
Eric Tailor@ToolTimeTailor·
@seditiorebellum @WayneWaldropW Just because someone climbed Mt Everest once doesn’t mean it’s not an insanely dangerous challenge for anybody else trying it next.
English
0
0
0
9
Wayne Waldrop
Wayne Waldrop@WayneWaldropW·
We are flying by the moon this time instead of landing on it despite it being 50 years since we last "landed on the moon". Why does this seem like a step back instead of progress?
English
129
5
174
5.3K