Eric Tailor

@babybilly1968 @VaranusRex @johngalt_shrugs @overton_news @grok Bro, we toppled their government and in democratically installed a dictator in 1953, twenty-six years prior to that.

@VaranusRex @johngalt_shrugs @overton_news @grok Bro , Iran took 52 American hostages in 1979. You’re the brain dead Jew Hater .

Joe Rogan tells Theo Von to his face he’s “losing his f*cking marbles” during the latest episode of the podcast. Rogan then urged him to get off antidepressants after Von went on a bizarre rant. VON: “It’s all just a cat and mouse game.” “People are like, ‘we’ll elect the Democrats next time.’ But it’s all...the same sh*t has been happening forever.” “They haven’t been helping anybody forever.” “They’re letting f*cking politicians slurp on kids!” “All of our f*cking money goes to Israel and they’re using it to f*cking genocide people!” “It’s like, everybody is scared out of their wits right now. It’s like, our religious leaders are afraid to speak out.” “It’s like...the...it’s a time where it’s like...satan is amongst us and our religious leaders are talking about bullsh*t at the polls!” “It’s just like, what is going...I don’t know man.” ROGAN: “We gotta get you off those antidepressants, son.” “You’re losing your f*cking marbles!” VON: “You think I am?” ROGAN: “Come hang out with us. Just chill out!”

@babybilly1968 @VaranusRex @johngalt_shrugs @overton_news @grok Lol did you ever ask yourself why? Did they just pick a country at random to hate?

@johngalt_shrugs @VaranusRex @overton_news @grok Our enemies? How were they our enemies? Did I cut Assad off on the freeway one time? Did I say something to piss off Gaddafi?

@VaranusRex @overton_news @grok Those were our enemies and our wars. In fact, Israel cautioned us against them.

@johngalt_shrugs @overton_news That’s the part you can see in direct payment. Nevermind the defense spending to protect ourselves from Israel’s enemies, or to preemptively bomb them. Then consider how much money and time our government spends fighting “antisemitism” and going to AIPAC fundraisers, etc.

"All of our fucking money goes to Israel." Let's fact check. Historically, we have "given" (more on that below) $3.8 billion/year to Israel, out of $5.2 trillion in income -- less than 1/10 of 1% of our money. Nowhere NEAR "all of our money." And the claim that we "give" it is grossly misleading. They're required to spend that money on U.S. defense companies that employ American workers. They then use those products in combat, thereby providing valuable and irreplaceable battlefield testing. They also share intelligence, which they are exceptionally skilled at doing. The economics are such that we probably gain more from the arrangement than Israel does.

@Mitch17334152 @benwehrman Physics 101. Force is mass x acceleration. And if an equal opposite force is applied, per Newtonian physics, you’ll move a large mass like a rocky quickly by moving exhaust out of it very quickly.

@benwehrman I’m still want to know how they get thrust in a vacuum. Do the normal thrusters in atmosphere switch over to a vacuum system once they leave the atmosphere. Where is this point where atmosphere converts to the vacuum of space.?

A speeding sniper rifle bullet flies at around 1,700 MPH. NASA says their astronauts are zooming around the universe at 15 TIMES that speed. Just stop and think about this for a second. Visualize the speed of a sniper bullet. Now multiply that by FIFTEEN. Are you buying this?

@benwehrman Yes. What’s the problem? There’s no atmosphere, no drag in space. You can travel 100000x the speed of a bullet no problem as long as the acceleration doesn’t exceed what the human body can take.

@Emilyaustin Three astronauts died a gruesome death because we weren’t cautious enough back then. We are more cautious now.

Not trying to be conspiratorial at all, but I’m genuinely confused… if we already landed on the moon decades ago, why does going back now feel like such a massive, complicated mission? 🤔

@MarchandSurgery What we did back then really has nothing to do with what we can do now with completely different hardware. The risks are about the same. We just know now how dangerous the original Apollo system really was and try to do better now. That’s why things take even longer now.

If anything were to happen to the Artemis II astronauts on this mission, it would be an amazingly strong argument that the original lunar landing was fake, exonerating all skeptics. If we can't circle the moon 57 years later, we probably didn't land on it and get back in 1969.

@SternDrewCrypto Lol they won’t land on the moon because they can’t. The Blue Origin lander didn’t even get out of the vacuum chamber test until next week. Axiom hasn’t finished building the space suit. Y’all are the psyop.

🚨 BREAKING: THE ARTEMIS LAUNCH IS THE DEEPEST COVER-UP YET. THEY ARE NOT GOING TO THE MOON. THEY ARE HIDING WHAT IS ALREADY THERE! 🚨 Yesterday's so-called historic Artemis II blast-off from Kennedy Space Center was not a triumphant return to the Moon after 50 plus years. It was Stage 2 of the greatest psyop in human history. They rolled out that bloated SLS rocket built with your tax dollars funneled through endless delays and cost overruns carrying four so-called heroes on a 10-day joyride. But ask yourself: Why no landing? Why just a quick lap around the Moon and back? Because they cannot risk showing you what is really on the lunar surface. The original Apollo missions? All filmed on a Hollywood soundstage. Van Allen radiation belts? Deadly. Flag waving in vacuum? Studio fans. No stars in the photos? Convenient lighting. Buzz Aldrin himself looked uncomfortable when pressed. Now they are rebooting the narrative with Artemis because the old lie is crumbling under scrutiny. This launch was pure theater: - Perfect timing right after years of technical issues and budget black holes. - Crew includes international players, Canadian astronaut and all, to make it look global while the real players pull strings from the shadows. - That convenient toilet fan glitch hours in? Classic distraction. Oh no, the billion-dollar potty broke! Meanwhile, the real payload, surveillance tech or alien artifact retrieval protocols, slips under the radar. Why now? Distraction from Earthly chaos. Keep the sheep cheering fireworks in the sky while the real power consolidates control over space narrative, resources, and the coming disclosure they will script themselves. The sheep are celebrating humanity's return. The awake see the strings. They faked it before. They are faking it better now. Question everything.

@guyfelicella @RodKahx It is ours. It certainly isn’t yours.

@RodKahx Americans think the moon is theirs the same way they think everything else is. Smh 🙄

Our moon. The average US citizen in a nutshell.

@Ac7ionMann Why is it impossible? I can show you the math that proves you are wrong.

Launching this crap on April fools day with no space POV? Guys it’s impossible to go to the moon. We didn’t do it in 69’ and we aren’t doing it now. They are going to sit in orbit for a week and have cgi do the rest. Fake and gay.

@Treeclimbergabe @tweettruth2me Because this is a practice run for the next mission. This lets the astronauts, Mission Control, the engineers see how it’s going to go on game day. There will be 10000 changes to Artemis III and IV as a result of Artemis II.

@tweettruth2me Even if you support a trip around the moon, why is it manned? Why risk lives? Everything is automated. You can make it smaller and cheaper. Cameras and videos are all you need, humans seeing it with their eyes do us no good.

Let’s say goodbye to $100 billion plus in taxpayer dollars.

@tweettruth2me @BigTexJames NASA isn’t the problem. Congress and corporations are the ones turning this into a moondoggle. NASA is doing a good job with the tiny budget they have.

@BigTexJames NASA is one of our biggest scams.

@Tazerface16 @jeffkelehernb What are you talking about? Your prediction is about getting to orbit, not deorbiting. Clearly Starship can get to orbit if SpaceX wants it to.

@jeffkelehernb Velocity means nothing. Control is everything. How would they have deorbited it, kiddo?

I'm an aerospace engineer. I made this prediction over five years ago, and I'm still correct. I'm not interested in non-engineers trying to explain to me how I'm wrong somehow. Elon Musk is not an engineer.

@anon8mous @Tazerface16 You don’t need a degree if you have experience. There’s very little I know with two Astronautical Engineering degrees that Elon doesn’t know.

@Tazerface16 Elon Musk has a Bachelor of ARTS in physics, not science, but calls himself a physicist/engineer,😂. He has never done an experiment or set foot in laboratory his whole life. The guy steals credit & put his name on research papers/patents of his employees b/c he owns the company.

@TSharp12086 @NavyStrang We lost three great astronauts. Grissom, White, and Chaffee. Yes we will likely lose more astronauts in the future, after Apollo 1, Challenger, and Columbia, NASA changed risk posture. Our systems now are many times safer than the Apollo systems.

@ToolTimeTailor @NavyStrang I expect you are correct on their purpose. No lives were lost on the moon. And if anyone thinks there will be no more lives lost because there is better tech these days, Welllllllll. well

One of them is on its way to the moon, the other keeps blowing up. I guess NASA concentrated on the important stuff.

@HighImpactFlix NASA didn’t have the budget to add a bunch of cabling, transmitters, and cameras. They could barely pull this off with minimum set of requirements. This rocket is years behind schedule and way over budget.

Holy Hell!! The Artemis 2 launch was PATHETIC and had horrible video feeds. They were better in the 1960s! How can this not be all by design? At least when Elon does a launch, there are multiple camera angles and it's entertaining. Even NASA's animation sucks!

@ThomasRGolden @Helloimmorgan That’s what happens when you take away 90% of NASA’s budget.

@Helloimmorgan With as much as tech has advanced we should be piloting the starship enterprise at this point, but no we've regressed to just taking a ride around the moon.

Why are they just going around the moon and not stepping on it…

@Helloimmorgan Because the landers and space suit aren’t ready yet, and we don’t want to wait. This is a practice run for the astronauts, Mission Control, and engineers who never did this before. Also, better to work out any kinks with SLS and Orion before we commit our people to the surface.

@seditiorebellum @WayneWaldropW Just because someone climbed Mt Everest once doesn’t mean it’s not an insanely dangerous challenge for anybody else trying it next.

@WayneWaldropW Makes you wonder, did we really land on the moon?

We are flying by the moon this time instead of landing on it despite it being 50 years since we last "landed on the moon". Why does this seem like a step back instead of progress?