Charlie Grutter

24.8K posts

Charlie Grutter banner
Charlie Grutter

Charlie Grutter

@c_grutter

sick, but healthy enough to know what needs to be done.

Beigetreten Mayıs 2017
1.9K Folgt237 Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
Charlie Grutter
Charlie Grutter@c_grutter·
"There is no spoon"
English
0
0
10
6.1K
Mark Dubowitz
Mark Dubowitz@mdubowitz·
If you keep telling Tehran it is winning while it is plainly losing, it will stick to maximalist terms, the war will resume, and the price will be more military losses and deeper economic devastation. Hormuz will eventually be solved—and the regime’s last leverage goes with it.
English
40
67
451
20.8K
Alex Jones
Alex Jones@RealAlexJones·
@paramounttactcl I don’t do my broadcast for followers. I think Candace overall is wrong about some of her views on Charlie Kirk, but at the end of the day she’s right about a cover-up. Trump is now openly a foreign asset. We are in a different world.
English
698
297
5.6K
159K
Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton
Alex Jones is begging for Candace Owens’ followers to follow him. Nothing more. Absolutely pathetic. Oh, how the mighty have fallen.
Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton tweet media
English
205
172
1.6K
162.3K
Jerry Dunleavy IV 🇺🇸
Jerry Dunleavy IV 🇺🇸@JerryDunleavy·
Friedman literally says he’s torn on whether he wants the U.S. or Iran to win because, on one hand, the Iranian regime is an evil terror plague on the Middle East & the best thing would be for the regime to fall, but on the other hand, that might benefit Trump & Bibi politically
Brent Baker 🇺🇲🇺🇦 🇮🇱@BrentHBaker

Don’t want Iran to lose if it means Trump wins. @TomFriedman of @NYTimes really wants “to see Iran defeated militarily because this regime is a terrible regime for its people and the region,” but on CNN’s @Smerconish he fretted “the problem is I really don’t want to see Bibi Netanyahu or Donald Trump politically strengthened by this war because they are too awful human beings. They are both engaged in anti-democratic projects in their own countries. They’re both alleged crooks. They are terrible, terrible people doing terrible things to America’s standing in the world and Israel’s standing in the world.”

English
5
14
67
4.3K
Mark Dubowitz
Mark Dubowitz@mdubowitz·
Good signs from U.S. negotiators: hold the red lines, reject regime demands. Washington has never had this kind of leverage—after the severe degradation of the regime’s war-making power, repression apparatus, and economic machinery.
Fox News@FoxNews

VP VANCE: “We need to see an affirmative commitment that they will not seek a nuclear weapon, and they will not seek the tools that would enable them to quickly achieve a nuclear weapon.” “That is the core goal of the president of the United States, and that's what we've tried to achieve through these negotiations.”

English
126
248
1.4K
224.8K
Yashar Ali 🐘
Yashar Ali 🐘@yashar·
Late last year, Alex Jones went after Candace Owens, suggesting that she was suffering from severe psychological issues. Now he says, “Candace Owens was ahead of the curve, and I officially apologized to her.”
Yashar Ali 🐘 tweet media
English
21
40
187
25.8K
BlockProf
BlockProf@theblockprof·
@zackbshapiro I did not say AI does this magically. If you want to be more precise about it, my Claude skill files can do anything a first year associate can do. Same result.
English
2
0
4
730
Charlie Grutter
Charlie Grutter@c_grutter·
@RealAlexJones Fuck off Alex - nothing you say comes true You said WW3 was going to happen constantly last year
English
0
0
6
225
Alex Jones
Alex Jones@RealAlexJones·
EXCLUSIVE: First Lady Melania Trump Despises 47 - High Level White House Sources Confirm On Thursday Melania Publicly Contradicted Her Husband And Called For A Full Investigation Of The Epstein Coverup! In This Powerful Report Alex Jones Breaks Down The Historic Crises Now Shaking The Trump Admin To Its Very Foundation x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English
405
431
2.2K
174.4K
Mark Dubowitz
Mark Dubowitz@mdubowitz·
Good for Tom Friedman for being honest. He hates Trump and Bibi so much that he doesn’t want them to win the war against the regime in Iran.
Brent Baker 🇺🇲🇺🇦 🇮🇱@BrentHBaker

Don’t want Iran to lose if it means Trump wins. @TomFriedman of @NYTimes really wants “to see Iran defeated militarily because this regime is a terrible regime for its people and the region,” but on CNN’s @Smerconish he fretted “the problem is I really don’t want to see Bibi Netanyahu or Donald Trump politically strengthened by this war because they are too awful human beings. They are both engaged in anti-democratic projects in their own countries. They’re both alleged crooks. They are terrible, terrible people doing terrible things to America’s standing in the world and Israel’s standing in the world.”

English
104
233
1K
159.7K
Grace Chong, MBI
Grace Chong, MBI@gc22gc·
TIM DILLON: We’re not even winning the trash talk war. You’d think America would win that at least, if we’re going to win one thing. Instead, we’re getting bodied by Iranian AI in the war of trash talk. How embarrassing. We invented this, and we’re getting lit up. 😂😂😂
English
115
902
6K
236.4K
Sweet Ray
Sweet Ray@polishmanium·
@c_grutter @gc22gc @TimJDillon Maybe we shouldn’t be starting wars? lol. This is what we get bruh. If you lived through the Iraq war you’d know we got booed at every sporting event for years. By like Europeans and Asians. War ain’t a good look.
English
1
0
33
359
The All-In Podcast
The All-In Podcast@theallinpod·
🚨BIG EPISODE BESTIES! Sacks is back, Fifth Bestie Brad Gerstner fills in for @Friedberg -- Anthropic withholds Mythos: serious concern or another marketing stunt? -- OpenClaw vs everybody: Are frontier model makers trying to kill the open source agent platform? -- Anthropic's $30B run rate: fastest ever, do they already have market dominance in AI code? -- The AI vibe shift: OpenAI reels as Anthropic rips -- Iran War: ceasefire and Israel's influence on US foreign policy (0:00) Bestie intros: Brad Gerstner joins the show! (4:22) Anthropic blocks Mythos release for security concerns: serious or marketing stunt? (24:07) Are OpenAI and Anthropic trying to kill OpenClaw? Does Anthropic already have market dominance in AI coding? (42:20) Anthropic $30B run rate, fastest revenue ramp ever, the TAM for intelligence (58:01) Major vibe shift: Anthropic ripping, OpenAI reeling (1:10:12) Iran War: Ceasefire, Israel's influence, market impact
English
74
90
936
250.5K
Charlie Grutter
Charlie Grutter@c_grutter·
@GaryMarcus @deanwball Arent you the guy until recently was laughing how ridiculous everyone was for being afraid of this AI exponential increase?
English
0
0
1
87
Gary Marcus
Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus·
To a degree that may surprise some people, I agree with much of this* from @deanwball and would only add that you don’t have to believe that AGI is remotely close to want to find—ASAP—a regulatory regime that foster innovation but also protects effectively against downside risks like massive cybercrime, Gen-AI influenced delusions, mass disinformation from foreign actors, nonconsensual deepfake porn, etc. We should not dismiss AI; we should not let it run entirely free. We need some middle ground. *I think that current frontiers models are highly capable in some ways but not others, and think in some important ways capability growth bulls have been important wrong (e.g. about how readily hallucinations could be remedied) but I don’t think that changes the need to act now.
Dean W. Ball@deanwball

“Describing highly capable frontier AI models as highly capable” is not “fear mongering.” “Taking AI seriously” is not “fear-mongering.” “Acknowledging obvious, realized or soon-to-be-realized risks” is not “fear-mongering.” The stark reality is that those who have taken AI capabilities growth seriously have been basically right about most important things in the last three years; those that haven’t have been consistently confused and, what’s worse, frustrated at the world about their own confusion. You don’t have to be a mega-pessimist or a “doomer” to take AI seriously. You don’t have to advocate for stark top-down controls over AI. You don’t have to support regulatory capture. It is possible to take AI seriously and advocate for a governmental response that is both effective *and* measured. To the young researchers out there, still trying to make their intellectual fortunes: Do not let anyone tell you otherwise. Do not let anyone bully you into believing otherwise. Think for yourself.

English
12
9
59
10.9K
Charlie Grutter retweetet
Dan Schwarz
Dan Schwarz@dschwarz26·
People are noticing that parts of AI 2027 have started coming true. Some reflections on the scary similarities. I should say, I and FutureSearch thought the AI 2027 scenario was a bit farfetched when first written, and really we were in love with the forecasts & modeling more than the story. (Quickly on the forecasting side, @DKokotajlo and @eli_lifland both recently moved their timelines forward significantly. I had held firm at what we published in AI 2027 originally, superhuman coding (~AGI takeoff) in 2032, slower than anyone at the AI Futures team thought. But now, like them, I'm updating to sooner, by 1 year or more.) So to the scenario. They wrote: Late 2025: "The same training environments that teach Agent-1 to autonomously code and web-browse also make it a good hacker." Maybe easy to predict, but the extent to which Mythos is an amazing hacker, and how important that is, they nailed. Early 2026: "DoD quietly but significantly begins scaling up contracting OpenBrain directly for cyber, data analysis, and R&D." Yep. To be fair, the AI 2027 story has the US government and the top frontier lab was more cozy. But then this radical stuff with Anthropic & Pentagon actually happened much earlier than expected: May 2027: "Some non-Americans, politically suspect individuals, and 'AI safety sympathizers' sidelined or fired (latter feared as potential whistleblowers)" This isn't quite what happened, but the basic idea, where AI safety got framed as disloyalty and politicized, absolutely happened, and way ahead of schedule. And of course: Jan 2027 section: "The safety team finds that if Agent-2 somehow escaped from the company and wanted to 'survive' and 'replicate' autonomously, it might be able to do so. That is, it could autonomously develop and execute plans to hack into AI servers, install copies of itself, evade detection, and use that secure base to pursue whatever other goals it might have." Just read the Mythos scorecard. I think there's something really significant about getting many of the details close, that isn't captured in a pure numerical forecast. If you haven't read it, AI 2027 deserves another read. It's spooky how prescient it seems now, one year later.
English
5
34
344
20.5K
Charlie Grutter retweetet
Jonathan Turley
Jonathan Turley@JonathanTurley·
MS NOW's Stephanie Ruhle actually praised Iran for "the fact that they have a deep belief in something. That's unfathomable to [Trump]. That they will die for." Of course, she was not referring to the tens of thousands of protesters executed by the regime for their deep beliefs.
English
420
2.6K
9.8K
86.8K