BlockProf

2.9K posts

BlockProf banner
BlockProf

BlockProf

@theblockprof

Prof of Forensic Accounting & Corporate/Securities/Banking Law, Expert Witness, Crypto Policy Ninja

United States Katılım Ekim 2011
2.8K Takip Edilen22.2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
BlockProf
BlockProf@theblockprof·
When you hire Veritas Financial Analytics as your policy consultant, your enemies become my enemies. veritasanalytics.net
GIF
English
4
3
22
10.5K
BlockProf
BlockProf@theblockprof·
I read punch bowl, I read your work and will continue to. But you missed an angle here. In your effort to focus on the “money in politics” trope, you missed the reason money had to step in. When asset backed securities and ETFs came on scene they didn’t need to fight in DC because they weren’t made into a political punching bag by Warren/Gensler. Crypto was. You papered over that part of the backstory. Do better.
Brendan Pedersen@BrendanPedersen

Crypto is on the verge of accomplishing an unprecedented act of legislative piracy — writing its own legal framework in an otherwise stalled out Congress with sweeping implications for all of American finance. I wrote about the money that brought us here and what it means:

English
0
3
12
1.6K
BlockProf retweetledi
Lewis Cohen
Lewis Cohen@NYcryptolawyer·
GIF
Jacob Robinson@JacobRobinsonJD

Monday's @LawofCodeFM podcast: the CLARITY Act. It's a multi-hour deep dive covering: 1. The history behind it 2. What gaps the 309-page bill addresses 3. How it regulates the industry 4. What projects need to know 5. Next steps to get it enacted You'll hear from experts like @NYcryptolawyer, @milesjennings, @SH_Brennan, @millercwl, @KyleBligen and Dugan Bliss, as well as snippets from prior episodes with @thatgerald and @BillHughesDC. Can't wait to share it.

ZXX
0
1
6
837
BlockProf retweetledi
Arjun Khemani
Arjun Khemani@arjunkhemani·
Zcash: A Swiss bank account in your pocket.
English
8
9
146
11.6K
BlockProf retweetledi
Cypherpunk ($CYPH)
Cypherpunk ($CYPH)@cypherpunk·
.@zooko: "Bitcoin is not a payment system that can empower individuals the way Zcashers and Hal Finney would have wanted."
English
36
35
246
39.6K
BlockProf
BlockProf@theblockprof·
Jay Clayton lets Wall Street guys walk. But let’s the dogs loose on @rstormsf in a runaway prosecution despite Treasury guidance saying what he did was not illegal and despite hung jury. I hope @CynthiaMLummis knows that Clayton should never be formally confirmed as US Atty.
Larry Tabb@ltabb

This is f*ing crazy. Self-report fraud and walk free, New York prosecutors tell Wall Street Hey SEC, I just ripped off my customers for $20b & paid my guys bigly, but can I walk away unscathed with no disclosure or penalty? ft.com/content/6344b5…

English
2
0
7
833
BlockProf retweetledi
ZachXBT
ZachXBT@zachxbt·
@zoomerfied @SilvXBT Interesting how NYSE only has issue with HL but not Polymarket. Never mind it all makes sense now.
ZachXBT tweet media
English
75
219
2.1K
98.7K
BlockProf retweetledi
BlockProf
BlockProf@theblockprof·
Voting for Clarity Act will be a lifeboat for Dems in next election. There isn’t room for everyone on the boat but there is room for 7 of you.
GIF
English
2
1
7
676
BlockProf
BlockProf@theblockprof·
@nuttycom Wait a sec, I think tokenized equity and governance tokens and memecoins and such can take on some of the attributes of money if two people are interested in barter. But not the full features of money I agree (like unit of account)
English
0
0
0
19
@nutty.land / @nuttycom@icosahedron.website
@theblockprof Anything that has utility *apart* from its use for exchange: commodities, securities, etc, aren’t money. Money is special in *lacking* that other utility. So crypto is definitely money.
English
1
0
0
30
BlockProf
BlockProf@theblockprof·
@JacobRobinsonJD @CarloD_Angelo @LawofCodeFM Perfect. My number one fear and the topic at the DC get together was how much we got rolled on BRCA and how much worse will it get in the push for more D votes. Will DEF’s line in the sand hold?
GIF
English
0
0
2
80
Jacob Robinson
Jacob Robinson@JacobRobinsonJD·
Monday's @LawofCodeFM podcast: the CLARITY Act. It's a multi-hour deep dive covering: 1. The history behind it 2. What gaps the 309-page bill addresses 3. How it regulates the industry 4. What projects need to know 5. Next steps to get it enacted You'll hear from experts like @NYcryptolawyer, @milesjennings, @SH_Brennan, @millercwl, @KyleBligen and Dugan Bliss, as well as snippets from prior episodes with @thatgerald and @BillHughesDC. Can't wait to share it.
Jacob Robinson tweet media
Eleanor Terrett@EleanorTerrett

🚨JUST IN: The Clarity Act ADVANCES out of the Senate Banking Committee in a 15-9 bipartisan vote, with two Democrats voting in favor: @SenRubenGallego and @Sen_Alsobrooks. Next stop: the full Senate.

English
12
7
63
6.7K
Austin Campbell
Austin Campbell@austincampbell·
I probably should not respond to this, but I am going to for the sake of the peanut gallery. The following are all crypto assets: 1 - Tokenized money market funds 2 - Tokenized bank deposits 3 - Tokenized gold 4 - Bitcoin 5 - Art 6 - Music 7 - Complex derivatives 8 - Tokenized stocks It is trivial to understand that neither all of those nor none of those are securities. The blinkered approach of the 2020-2024 SEC that attempted to claim all tokens were securities is just as dumb as saying no tokens are securities. Similarly, notice that I said tokenized bank deposits, which should probably give someone an idea about why, you know, the Banking Committee might be looking at this. Or are we trying to argue that JPMD is not a banking product, because, wow, boy, damn, you might want to check with the OCC and the Fed (and the 1933 banking act) about that one first? It should be trivially obvious to anyone that "tokens" is about as useful a descriptor as "financial instruments" (even less specific, in fact), and that clear rules of the road about taxonomy, design, handling, and more would be exceptionally beneficial across a number of verticals, before we even get to things like the BRCA (and, again, why is it a question than Bank Secrecy Act related questions are being handled by the Banking Committee!?). Then again, what do we expect from the team that missed all of FTX, Luna, 3AC, Celsius, BlockFi, and more but managed to stop the horrific scourge of (checks notes) Stoner Cats and, to add insult to injury, suffered the only contempt finding in the entire history of the SEC thanks to their insane bumbling and borderline criminality in a case?
Amanda Fischer@amandalfischer

why is the Banking Committee marking-up crypto legislation if crypto assets aren't securities? Doesn't that Committee have jurisdiction over securities, not commodities? I don't get it, the industry spent years saying crypto didn't fall within the SEC's jurisdiction...?

English
11
21
130
28.2K
BlockProf retweetledi
Faryar Shirzad 🛡️
Faryar Shirzad 🛡️@faryarshirzad·
Big thanks @SenMcCormickPA for your support for building the future of the financial system here in the United States.
Senator Dave McCormick@SenMcCormickPA

Just voted to advance the CLARITY Act out of the @BankingGOP Committee with bipartisan support. This is a big step for crypto, consumer protection, and keeping the future of finance here in America. Now let’s get it to the Senate Floor and onto the @POTUS's desk.

English
1
9
49
2.5K
BlockProf retweetledi
Faryar Shirzad 🛡️
Faryar Shirzad 🛡️@faryarshirzad·
Thanks for your leadership and for your embrace of innovation that makes the financial system work for the American people @Sen_Alsobrooks.
Senator Angela Alsobrooks@Sen_Alsobrooks

The digital revolution is upon us, and it has presented a clear opportunity to support small businesses, generate wealth, spur innovation, and support younger Americans who want to be part of this revolution. And this digital revolution is happening with us or without us—we have a responsibility to regulate it to create rules of the road. That is why I’ve been at the table. I’ve been in negotiations for over nine months, working toward regulating digital assets in a way that protects consumers and reduces the risks of deposit flight and deceptive marketing. I have negotiated in good faith with colleagues on both sides of the aisle willing to meet this critical moment. I’ve worked to make this bill better. Let me be very clear: my vote today is a vote to keep working in good faith. It does not mean I will be voting for the passage of the CLARITY Act on the floor. We still have work to do. We need to find a workable way to address law enforcement’s concerns about financial crimes. I am a former prosecutor and know how important that is. We also need to include an agreement on ethics—that would apply not just to the President and Vice President but to all of us. The American people—especially my constituents—expect that from us. I will keep working with my colleagues to get this done. Americans—from every background and every community—deserve to benefit financially from this digital revolution and be protected from the risks that come with it. If we don’t act, we will be left behind. I won’t let that happen.

English
0
6
42
3.7K