QA.tech

74 posts

QA.tech banner
QA.tech

QA.tech

@getqatech

Your Autonomous QA Engineer https://t.co/tY1wU6Sf6d

Beigetreten Mayıs 2024
68 Folgt136 Follower
QA.tech
QA.tech@getqatech·
@cjc @levelsio 4. Improve: Agentic testing gives qualitative feedback, finds bugs and areas for improvement, feeding new issues into Linear this is the future we are building for.
English
0
0
0
41
Cristina Cordova
Cristina Cordova@cjc·
This is exactly the workflow we’re building for at Linear. 1. Logs to issues: Auto-sync Sentry or Datadog alerts directly into Linear linear.app/integrations/s… 2. Issues to code: Use our new AI deep links to push those issues straight into Claude Code or other agents linear.app/changelog/2026… 3. Review: We’re currently in beta with the final step, automated PR reviews, to close the loop linear.app/reviews
English
7
5
65
5.2K
@levelsio
@levelsio@levelsio·
This is fun but what if we connect my PHP, JS and server error logs AND the bug and feature request board to an AI that then writes the code and does pull requests that I then approve or reject? How I do this? Can I do it with Claude Code?
@levelsio@levelsio

This week I decided to just permanently switch to running Claude Code on the server mostly on bypass permissions mode: c() { IS_SANDBOX=1 claude --dangerously-skip-permissions "$@"; } And for the first time in my life I think I've actually managed to outrun my todo list What happened is I simply blasted through my to do list of features I had to build and bugs I had to fix I've never shipped so fast and Claude Code almost made no mistakes, and when it did it they were tiny that weren't fatal (important because I'm mostly working on the server in production now) Before I was always known to ship fast (also because I always work alone) but while I shipped new things would always build up on my features/bug board (my users can submit them there) But this is the first week where I've been fast enough to outrun them The board is actually empty! As other people have written on here the real bottleneck is becoming myself and my creativity, not how fast I can ship. Because I think I ship faster now than I can come up with new ideas, or maybe my brain will adjust to this new speed (probably) Also I feel another limit is becoming my own mental context window, as in how many things, features, bugs, projects, I can keep in my mind in parallel while building on all of them. It's a lot and I haven't reached that limit yet but I feel I might be close I also noticed that you start going really fast the more you let it just go loose, before I was slow because I didn't trust it and I was scared it would destroy my code, now I just let it go. As @karpathy wrote, things feel like they've changed a lot around December last year when models became good enough to really code with and I feel the same When I see other friends code with Claude Code I often notice they're slow because they still check everything, which is good of course, but I feel the better way would be to create some tests and just let it run freely and see if it can pass those For me the tests are mostly just me checking out if the new feature on the site works or not, and in 99% cases it just does, and then I ask it to improve it further Because I run Claude Code on the server in production, I don't have to wait for deployment anymore (although that took only 3 seconds anyway before, that still adds up), now it's wait for it to be done coding, I refresh the site and I test it, that feedback loop is how I work and it's made me WAY faster Anyway here's what I did this week and the majority of these things were requested by people on the bug board, I'd say this is about 10x my normal output: 📸 Photo AI - Built new image viewer and mobile image viewer - Added batch remix, multi-photo import, filtering by model in gallery - Security overhaul: phased out insecure ?hash= login, migrated to session tokens - Fixed Google login loop, multi-model selection, talking scripts - Added custom audio upload for talking videos - Created dynamic model selector from server endpoint 🏡 Interior AI - Revived [ Add furniture ] feature (started 6 months ago, image models now good enough) - Added custom style upload for redesigns - Built own Gaussian Splat viewer for 3D - Made /remove_bg endpoint for furniture backgrounds - Migrated 3D walkthrough to new World Labs API - Added .skp file support, paint color masking, empty room button 🎒 Nomads - Launched weekly AI-generated newsletter from chat - Built profile edit modal, moved profile editing from /settings to profile page - Added TikTok/YouTube links, status bar, server-side API tracking - Added hundreds of new profile tags and traits - Fixed timezone filters, broken links, user avatars 🗺️ Hoodmaps - Revived write mode (before was only read for last few years because db was rekt) - Built heatmap mode using sentiment-scored tags (50K+ tags) - Fixed root cause: tags not entering DB due to wrong PRAGMA (should be WAL) - Added good/bad area detection with admin grid controls - Set up Claude Code Telegram bot for live changes - Enabled CF cache, fixed health check, fixed Brussels 📕 MAKE book - Built auto ePub/PDF generator cron worker - Added dynamic generation with personal customer watermarks - Added image compression for file size 💾 Pieter .com - Added Wikipedia text-only reader for Kindle - Exploring Windows 3.11 emulator using v86 (to replace Em-DOSBox) - Added product recommendations on homepage - Installed Wall Street Raider (1986) 👩‍💻 Remote OK - Installed Chatbase AI customer support bot - Added "report not remote" link on job posts 🏨 Hotelist (3 todos) - Fixed hotel URLs and city range bugs - Added iron amenity

English
161
9
356
191K
QA.tech
QA.tech@getqatech·
@ctatedev Love it this is what we have been building for the last few years. If you don’t want to handle this yourself. Give us a try!
English
0
0
2
878
Chris Tate
Chris Tate@ctatedev·
New: Autonomous Dogfooding A skill for agent-browser that uses your app the way your users do → Point it at any URL → Explores pages, clicks buttons, fills forms → Tests edge cases and checks the console → Captures repro videos and step-by-step screenshots → Outputs a structured report with severity ratings No test scripts. No manual QA.
Chris Tate tweet media
English
114
177
3.6K
609.6K
Rohit Agarwal
Rohit Agarwal@jumbld·
Huge news: our team at Portkey has raised $15M in Series A funding led by @ElevCap w/ @lightspeedvp 🎉 As agentic workflows become a reality and businesses recognize AI as mission-critical infrastructure, we’re here to ensure it never breaks. (1/5)
English
44
64
360
225.7K
QA.tech
QA.tech@getqatech·
@Shpigford If you want to go furher down this path, we do basically that but handle multiple browsers, parallell execution, connect to github etc :) All test cases are in natural language
English
0
0
0
16
Josh Pigford
Josh Pigford@Shpigford·
"real" programmers are going to drag me through the mud on this but alas i could not care less. tl;dr i now have claude run a full "suite" of E2E tests using plain english + playwright traditional E2E tests are a giant pain to maintain. they're incredibly fragile and just not a good fit for any codebase that's rapidly changing/expanding. but they ARE hugely impactful in an AI-assisted-programming world because they allow AI to verify their work in the same way a user of your app would. you could have AI write/maintain your traditional E2E tests, but i promise they'll quickly miss CSS selectors and feature changes and you'll become deeply enraged. instead, you can use markdown and have claude run through all major scenarios for you! i'll generally manually run it a couple of times a day to sanity check the full app using a custom /e2e claude command. this is just to augment the rest of the traditional test suite as one last final bit of proof that things actually function for users.
Josh Pigford tweet mediaJosh Pigford tweet mediaJosh Pigford tweet mediaJosh Pigford tweet media
English
102
49
1.1K
119.7K
QA.tech
QA.tech@getqatech·
@ericzakariasson now you guys just need some really good QA testing on PRs 👀
English
0
0
1
23
QA.tech
QA.tech@getqatech·
@80sGeek @omarsar0 No - no playwright, all tests are in natural language and interpreted and evaluated in real-time
English
0
0
0
11
Mild Mannered Maniac
Mild Mannered Maniac@80sGeek·
@getqatech @omarsar0 Ok here we go, you does that thing poop out playwright? They need a better marketing video the value prop here is a no brainer This is a painkiller
English
1
0
0
20
Adam Ji
Adam Ji@Adam_Ji·
So many people online are asking the same question: “Where do I even start with QA automation? 😭” And honestly… that confusion is real. Different languages, different tools, different bugs — and 100 different opinions on Reddit. But here’s the twist 👇 If you’re feeling overwhelmed, that usually means you’re trying to learn automation the old way. Modern coders don’t need 6 tools, 12 scripts, and 3 nights of debugging just to test a login page. They start with @Test_Sprite — the most user-friendly automation platform built for today’s workflow. Why new testers love it: 1️⃣ Ridiculously simple UX — no setup chaos, no config nightmares. 2️⃣ Super accurate test results + auto video recordings so you see exactly where a bug happens. 3️⃣ Free trial — so you can actually experience real end-to-end testing before committing. If you’re curious → give testsprite.com/?ref=ZZ28 a try. It might be the easiest decision you make today.
Adam Ji tweet media
English
3
0
2
61
Mild Mannered Maniac
Mild Mannered Maniac@80sGeek·
@omarsar0 It's closer to my dream of an AI testing my site, in fact it can do it, and it's really good at it. It discovers everything on it's own it'll click shit for an hour i just proved it Now if i can get it to shit out Playwright tests, then I will be happy, for now...
English
1
0
0
381
swyx
swyx@swyx·
good showing from @coderabbitai at sf caltrain i am very late to this but am starting to seriously consider that code review ai tools might have larger TAM than code gen ai tools. basic intuition: - both ai authored and human authored code can benefit from review - exponential increase in vibe coding creates insane review load past human tipping point - code is easier to verify/lint than to generate reliably
swyx tweet media
English
27
10
148
20.5K
PL Bompard
PL Bompard@PLBompard·
Pitch your startup - Max 4 words - Share link when ready 👀 Seen by 175k people last month 📈 YES, this is marketing - GO!
English
548
14
343
48.4K
Ângelo Marques
Ângelo Marques@angelomarquesc·
Is there any AI testing tool?
English
1
0
0
10
QA.tech
QA.tech@getqatech·
@fmerian Thanks for the support 🙌💕
English
1
0
1
9
fmerian/launch
fmerian/launch@fmerian·
results: #2 Product of the Day, featured in the daily newsletter #2 Developer Tool of the Week s/o to the @getqatech team for this launch
English
2
0
1
56
QA.tech retweetet
fmerian/launch
fmerian/launch@fmerian·
I had a blast working on this launch. There are rare talents on this team with high-quality standards and attention to detail. The result? A polished product with a stellar first-time experience. Join us today on Product Hunt ↓
QA.tech@getqatech

QA.tech 1.0 is live! 📷  Today marks a huge milestone for us. This isn’t just a version number, it’s the result of months of building, refining, and crafting something we truly believe in. producthunt.com/products/qa-te…

English
2
1
5
907
QA.tech retweetet
Olle Pridiuksson
Olle Pridiuksson@pridiuksson·
So let's agree on this - you send me an URL to your web app/service and I will create you a PERSONAL testing suite tailored to YOUR web app? CONTEXT:
Olle Pridiuksson tweet media
English
2
4
8
870
QA.tech
QA.tech@getqatech·
Your users aren’t scripted, why should your tests be?
English
1
2
6
246
QA.tech
QA.tech@getqatech·
QA.tech 1.0 is live! 📷  Today marks a huge milestone for us. This isn’t just a version number, it’s the result of months of building, refining, and crafting something we truly believe in. producthunt.com/products/qa-te…
English
5
0
6
1.3K
QA.tech
QA.tech@getqatech·
@alexcooldev You can try using our product to have an agent test your critical user journey before every release 🕵️‍♂️
English
0
0
0
6
Alex Nguyen
Alex Nguyen@alexcooldev·
I just lost $300-$700/day and got over 10 one-star reviews because of a silly bug that broke a key feature in my app for the whole day. No new revenue, just frustration. Back when I worked 9-5 with a team, someone would've caught this in a code review. I'm try using CodeRabbit AI to review my code, and that amazing all problems are solved. So currently, here's my new combo for building: - Cursor AI – for coding - CodeRabbit AI – for code review PS: be care full each time you merge code to main with CI/CD. Should I hire a Tester, QA, or QC for my project? Or does anyone suggest AI tools that can handle manual testing? 🤔
Alex Nguyen tweet mediaAlex Nguyen tweet media
English
38
13
249
40.5K