MAFIASWAT

valor in fructu non in verbo.

One of the prediction markets that’s being hyped as a game-changer, offering up to 10x leverage. TGE on April 29. Open beta is now available to everyone. I’m hoping the next big ICO win is here👀

@VIhnatiuk @utexocom Utexo can solve the problem

Every time a B2B operator told us they were afraid to come onchain, it was because of one of these reasons. Same five, every time. @utexocom is how we solve all of them.

@ChangzhCrypto Awesome.

@leoxwolf_ More the second. The tech is largely there, but institutions are locked into legacy systems, regulations, and risk models that make switching costly and slow. It’s less about building better rails, more about making the transition worth the disruption.

I stared at the numbers again last night and felt this strange mix of awe and frustration. Traditional finance moves over $100 trillion in global deposits, locks up around $27 trillion in pre-funded correspondent banking accounts, and handles roughly $3.7 quadrillion in annual transaction volume. Yet the infrastructure behind it is still slow, fragmented, and expensive. Institutions don’t just need faster pipes. They need privacy for sensitive activity, full control over how transactions are executed, cryptographic certainty without relying on trusted intermediaries, and seamless connectivity to liquidity and counterparties. Most blockchains fail at delivering all four at once. Prividium, built by @zksync on the ZK Stack, was designed to solve exactly this tension. It runs as a permissioned Validium: institutions keep all transaction data and state completely off-chain in their own controlled environment, while zero-knowledge proofs anchor everything to Ethereum for final settlement and security. This gives them sovereign execution with public verifiability, a combination that has been missing until now. What do you see as the single biggest inefficiency in today’s financial system that a well-designed onchain architecture could solve? I’m genuinely curious to hear your perspective

@RealFinOfficial For real?

The date is locked. 🎉 April 30. REAL TGE. The build-up is over. The launch phase begins. Stay sharp. Stay tuned. REAL is about to move.

@__allend__ How does this handle Bitcoin's halving events? Traditional leverage products might behave differently around halvings due to volatility spikes. Has Fragments modeled this?

Just had an interesting realization about leverage products in crypto - they're all basically designed to make you check your phone every five minutes, right? The constant anxiety of liquidation, the funding fees that slowly bleed your position, it's like trying to sleep with a dripping faucet in the next room. Then I came across BTC-Jr from @FragmentsOrg and it's a completely different approach. Instead of borrowing against your position (hello margin calls!), they've built 1.33x exposure directly into the token structure. According to their documentation, it's designed for buy-and-hold investors rather than traders - which honestly flips the script on what leverage should be. The analogy that really stuck with me is: "Owning BTC-Jr is similar to owning a plot of land that naturally yields 33% more crops than your neighbor's, without extra work." That's the part that makes me pause - no debt, no liquidation risk, just structural exposure that compounds over time. Most leverage products feel like renting power tools with hidden fees; this feels more like inheriting a well-orchestrated farm. What I'm still trying to wrap my head around is how this structural leverage handles extreme volatility. Traditional leverage breaks in 30%+ crashes because of margin calls, but if BTC-Jr's exposure comes from the token structure itself rather than borrowed funds, does that mean it could theoretically survive market conditions that would wipe out other leveraged positions? The team mentions it's "coming soon on Fragments" but I haven't seen detailed breakdowns of how it behaves in different market scenarios. Signed up for the waitlist at link.fragments.org/rally - apparently during April, 10 random signups win $200 each ($2,000 total). Curious to see if the whitepaper has more technical details about the mechanics behind this structural approach. Anyone here who's dug deeper into how Fragments actually constructs this leverage? 10 waitlist signups win $200 each in the April giveaway I'm particularly interested in the tokenomics and whether there are any hidden risks that aren't immediately apparent from the high-level description.

GM

@onchaincc LFG🔥

Missed our stream? Referring pays more now when desktop goes live. $0.50 per milestone, every time, from every person you bring in. We broke it down on stream 👇

@pinai_io gm

gm 🫡

What the hell is this? Another Telegram username just sold for $500K and I still don’t see the endgame. But I won’t ignore this: TON NFTs are heating up, and Telegram just made it ridiculously easy to deploy bots and AI agents. Is $TON about to run this alt season? Is tap-to-earn airdrop meta coming back? DYOR. sc: getgems.io/collection/EQC…

@MonacoTrading Soon monaco 👀

Stop scrolling. Close your eyes. Imagine it.

@RallyOnChain Great job

Just disqualified 4 cheaters from the Post. Compete. Win campaign Don't try to Game the system, just focus on create the best content!

@KaitoAI Another another another ...

Billions Network TGE is approaching. In light of community feedback, the Billions team is offering community round contributors three options ahead of TGE: - A: 100% refund - B: Full allocation + 25% bonus, 6-month lock - C: Full allocation + 50% bonus, 12-month lock Selection window: Apr 27, 12pm UTC → May 18, 12pm UTC Options B and C are for contributors who want to stay aligned with Billions over the longer term. Refunds will be processed after the selection window closes and handled in the order in which they are received, subject to the stated processing period. Selections will be final once submitted. Only original contributing wallets will be eligible to make a selection. Contributors who do not select an option before the deadline will default to a full refund. Submit here: kaito.ai/capital-launch…

@arbitrum Needs airdrop arbitrum V2🫠

Gm to everyone growing the programmable economy this week.

@MrUncleBro Are u cooking today?👀

🧑‍🍳 👀…

@yantowid1 Awesome.

@leoxwolf_ Exactly, Rally removes that operational burden so agencies can finally focus on narrative, positioning, and scaling campaigns

Crypto agencies, be honest. How much of your time is still spent chasing KOLs in DMs, updating spreadsheets, and guessing if a campaign actually worked? You charge for strategy, but most of the work is ops hell: • creator sourcing • manual tracking • inflated metrics • zero verifiable ROI The current influencer model is broken. Everyone knows it. Nobody has fixed it. @RallyOnChain is the first thing that actually looks like infrastructure, not another “platform.” It flips the model: • campaigns run on-chain • creators submit content directly • AI scores quality, relevance, and real engagement • rewards are distributed transparently No gatekeeping. No fake reach. No back-and-forth chaos. And here’s the part most agencies are missing: Rally is not replacing you. It removes the lowest-leverage work so you can focus on what clients actually pay for: narrative, positioning, and distribution strategy. Instead of proving ROI with screenshots and vibes, you get: on-chain performance data AI-verified engagement transparent attribution That’s a completely different level of credibility when you’re reporting to clients. Agencies that treat this as a threat will get outpaced. Agencies that integrate it into their stack will scale faster with less friction. This is what marketing infrastructure looks like in crypto. If you run an agency or manage KOL campaigns, how are you handling attribution and performance today? Reply with your current stack or pain points.

@VIhnatiuk @a16zcrypto Sounds interesting

Two takeaways from @a16zcrypto's report: 1. B2B payments are growing fast (66% YoY), accounting for ~40% of total volume. For businesses, privacy and cost programmability will be increasingly in demand. 2. Local, non-USD stablecoins are on the rise — FX wars have begun.

@TREX_chain 2030 still cooking

2026 progress ▓▓░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 20%

@moonpay gm moonpay!

gm!