Eudaimonia ↗️🐦🧍‍♀️

41.8K posts

Eudaimonia ↗️🐦🧍‍♀️ banner
Eudaimonia ↗️🐦🧍‍♀️

Eudaimonia ↗️🐦🧍‍♀️

@spoam

Enabling Eudaimonia for Seven Generations

Beigetreten Nisan 2009
909 Folgt441 Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
Eudaimonia ↗️🐦🧍‍♀️
@scottsantens Other idea: Universal Basic Credit Central Bank issues a Basic Credit card to every citizen with a $250 limit, interest free Every month, max $250 balance is forgiven and written off If balance is zero, credit limit doubles (max $10,000) Direct Distributed Quantitative Easing
English
1
15
27
0
Pierre Poilievre
Pierre Poilievre@PierrePoilievre·
Mark Carney's budget will drive up the cost of living on every Canadian - on food, on homes and on everything else Canadians buy. Conservatives demanded an affordable budget for an affordable life. On behalf of the Canadians that Liberals have priced out of food, homes and life, Conservatives voted no tonight on this costly credit card budget that gambles away Canada’s future.
English
1.2K
791
5.6K
335.8K
Eudaimonia ↗️🐦🧍‍♀️
@SteveSaretsky As a realtor, you should know about radical crown title. Does the king of England introduce uncertainty to fee simple titles? Look for precedents where fee simple exists on indigenous title lands Reading + comprehension = effective negotiations #CrownLand #INDIGENOUS
English
0
0
0
4
Steve Saretsky
Steve Saretsky@SteveSaretsky·
Richmond Property owners who says he’s owned his home since 1975 and paying taxes on it has been told by his lender they won’t be renewing his mortgage after First Nations land claim. This is just the start.
English
1K
2K
7.3K
1.5M
Eudaimonia ↗️🐦🧍‍♀️
@JohnRustad4BC As a politician, you should know about radical crown title. Does the king of England introduce uncertainty to fee simple titles? Look for precedents where fee simple exists on indigenous title lands Reading + comprehension = effective negotiations #CrownLand #INDIGENOUS
English
0
0
0
3
John Rustad
John Rustad@JohnRustad4BC·
Do you own your home? Are your private property rights at risk? This is a valid question thanks to David Eby’s NDP who directed the crown not to argue extinguishment of indigenous rights to protect private property rights. Now, because of him, mortgages are at risk.
Steve Saretsky@SteveSaretsky

Richmond Property owners who says he’s owned his home since 1975 and paying taxes on it has been told by his lender they won’t be renewing his mortgage after First Nations land claim. This is just the start.

English
247
216
966
79.5K
Eudaimonia ↗️🐦🧍‍♀️
@ikwilson As a lawyer, you should know about radical crown title. Does the king of England introduce uncertainty to fee simple titles? Look for precedents where fee simple exists on indigenous title lands Reading + comprehension = effective negotiations #CrownLand #INDIGENOUS
English
0
1
0
10
Eudaimonia ↗️🐦🧍‍♀️
@sarkonakj As a "journalist", you should know about radical crown title. Does the king of England introduce uncertainty to fee simple titles? Look for precedents where fee simple exists on indigenous title lands Reading + comprehension = effective negotiations #CrownLand #INDIGENOUS
English
0
1
0
18
Tim Pettit
Tim Pettit@Tim_Pettit_·
Private property rights and aboriginal title are mutually exclusive. They can only co-exist during a period of transition which ends with either the aboriginal title being bought off the private property or, alternatively, the private property right being extinguished in favour of the aboriginal title, ie. the indigenous group takes ownership of the property. The NDP appear to be in a major campaign of damage control where they are trying to tell British Columbians that they need not worry about Cowichan Tribes. This may be because the NDP decolonization initiative, as represented by DRIPA etc..., runs parallel to court cases advancing aboriginal title claims and, thus, concerns about the Cowichan Tribes decision are echoed in concerns with the NDP decolonization initiative. But, politics aside, the NDP should not be soft peddling the consequences of the Cowichan Tribes decision. It is a very consequential decision which will resolve either by: - expropriation of a substantial portion of a BC private property; or, - government buying out aboriginal title from a substantial portion of BC private property leaving private property owners intact but a potential government fiscal crisis; or, - constitutional amendment of s. 35 of the Constitution, removing aboriginal title from private property; or, - secession of BC from Canada which would return BC control over constitutional matters; or, - SCC does a significant 180 degree turn on SCC case law since 1997 Delgamuukw; One concern here is the period of uncertainty following the Cowichan Tribes decision. There may be years of uncertainty. In the meantime, the private property owners stand to be harmed and all private property in BC falls under question.
English
10
1
12
241
Jamie Sarkonak
Jamie Sarkonak@sarkonakj·
"The fact is, you can respect Aboriginal title and private property." Just making it up as they go. This issue is actually so uncertain. In New Brunswick, a judge even suggested that courts could order the Crown to expropriate private land and give it to the Indigenous people.
Mortimer@mortimer_1

“That’s why, in the Cowichan case, our government argued explicitly that the rights of private property landowners must be protected” An absolute lie by the BC NDP members in this article… the BC NDP are getting desperate… a puff piece Op Ed vancouversun.com/opinion/op-ed/…

English
14
29
140
9.6K
Keith Wilson
Keith Wilson@ikwilson·
95% of BC's land base is currently subject to unresolved claims of Aboriginal title. The court just ruled in the Cowichan case that a successful determination of Aboriginal title can declare fee simple interests invalid as unjustified infringements. This means the assumed indefeasibility of registered titles of BC home and business owners under BC’s Land Title Act just flew out the window.
Keith Wilson tweet media
English
396
642
1.9K
299.6K
Mario Zelaya
Mario Zelaya@mario4thenorth·
The demolition has begun. This is bigger than you realize. This is the destruction of one of the key pillars of Canada. Ownership. Of land. Of your homes. The implications are terrifying. “You will own nothing and be happy”
Mario Zelaya tweet media
English
553
2.1K
6.4K
169.8K
deltron
deltron@drooski78·
@mario4thenorth All land should be handed back to First Nations and Canadians pay rent to live.
English
65
0
15
3.8K
SP Solutions
SP Solutions@spttestslope·
If people can vote, they will vote for a constitutional amendment to protect their land ownership. If the right of voting is taken away or cheated away, there will be a revolution. It’s a simple as that. The first nations people do deserve some kind of compensation, but not other peoples houses. @PrepperCanadian
English
7
0
5
1.5K
Kevin Meunier 🇨🇦🪬☯️
@mario4thenorth People have never really "owned" their property, in Canada. Annexation, taxation, land-lease agreements, historical designations, protected fauna & green space, as well as municipal by-laws, building codes & permits. With a mortgage the bank owns & you rent it for 20 or 30yrs.
English
1
1
6
146
Dem0084a
Dem0084a@dem0084a·
@mario4thenorth Hopefully Canadians are gearing up to defend their rights. Everyone should be ready to defend their home by any means necessary. You think the banks are going to forgoes the mortgages when it gets seized?
English
5
2
21
633