tripzero

Announcement: aizero 1.6.1 is out. Aizero is the framework I used to run my greenhouse and now my home over the last 3 years. It's focus is "doing the right thing" and energy saving. Would love feedback. github.com/tripzero/aizero

@TeslaJigsaw It kinda is the best 😁

TRIGGER ALERT: Jason Cammisa just said "Cybertruck Is the Best Car Ever" 😂 Independent auto legend drops the hot take + explains why EVs are obviously the superior drivetrain. He’s right. Video below 👇

@NotEvolution1 Not true. Some are vegetables without an original thought on their brains.

@rshinra @BornAgainBalaky Evolution is a scientific model that predicts what we see but does not require a designer. If you want to believe this, you can, but it's outside of science.

@BornAgainBalaky Science points to an intelligent designer that designed the process of evolution.

According to science we are stardust. Either way we come from dust. But science points to an intelligent designer who made us from the dust as well. Christianity and history tells us that designer is Jesus Christ.

@BornAgainBalaky History says no such thing

@cpchambe @Tsar_Martyr To add, we are in the group hominidae because we share more in common with fellow members (morphological and genetically) than with any other group. It's not an arbitrary grouping. It is a grouping made from measurement and observation.

@Tsar_Martyr You misspelled ’biologists,’ You are an ape; an especially silly one. Humans are in the taxa Hominidae, or Great Apes. Chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans are also Hominidae.

Atheists believe George Floyd was an Ape

@darwintojesus Why does Darth Vadar not exist, you heathen!

Atheists will say you’re stupid or ignorant if you believe in God and then they can’t tell you why you shouldn’t. Why does God not exist?

@AgainstAtheismX Atheists have no problem going after insignificant minorities... Like young, wet earthers.

Ever seen an Atheist attack a neo-pagan? A buddhist? Do you see them attacking children who believe in the tooth-fairy? Or Santa claus? It's because they know those things don't exist. Christianity, however...

@KenElderReal1 @054durin @Tsar_Martyr That's stupid and you know it. That makes everything a god and nothing simultaneously. Even the big bang originated from a prior state. Congratulations, you've just destroyed God.

If the universe is guided, that by its very definition is a God concept no matter what you call it because it's the Prime Mover. It doesn't matter if it's humans from the future programming the universe or interdimensioal beings. It could be nature,it could be collective universal awareness- none of that matters. Atheism states, with no wiggle room, there's no such thing as gods or God. merriam-webster.com/dictionary/god

You know atheists are cowards because they never defend their own position

@KenElderReal1 @054durin @Tsar_Martyr It can be guided, but you have committed a binary error. God is not the only possible guide.

@tripzero @054durin @Tsar_Martyr You simply do not understand atheism- you just don't. A cannot be both A and B at the same time. Either the universe is guided or it's not, this is not my opinion, that's logic.

@KenElderReal1 @054durin @Tsar_Martyr Way to not address the argument. So much for logic

@tripzero @054durin @Tsar_Martyr You just don't do well with logic or you have really bad luck when it comes to thinking. Rather than double down, why not instead, gather your courage and own your worldview? At least then, it's a respectable debate.

@KenElderReal1 @054durin @Tsar_Martyr You could also believe we exist in a simulation and still be an atheist.

@KenElderReal1 @054durin @Tsar_Martyr I destroyed your assumptions. You don't know atheism. You could believe that future humans created the universe in a 5D time loop and still be an atheist.

@KenElderReal1 @054durin @Tsar_Martyr Only the first one is correct. The others are assumptions. There is no requirement for any atheist to have a view or opinion on any of the rest. An atheist may not believe in a god, but maybe he believes aliens or fairies created the universe and its laws? You don't know.

You do make a claim and everyone knows it. You just don't have the courage to state it. Let me help you with that. 1) There are no gods or God 2) The universe is mindless and unguided 3) The principal dynamic of the universe is cause and effect 4) The best method of determining reality is science We all know- You can stop hiding.

@Theo_102_ @JUNIORTRADER77 Who is a Jewish historian. OP is misleading, but not wrong.

@JUNIORTRADER77 Cherry picking. He left out Josephus.

@DSBrenchley @JUNIORTRADER77 Because Jewish historian Josephus and other evidence.

@JUNIORTRADER77 Yet, Erhman believes Christ existed. Seems like an ignorant post.

@shuwaruzu @Senobnevar @JUNIORTRADER77 There is no source. We barely have anything written about Pontus let alone a letter about Jesus written by him.

@Senobnevar @JUNIORTRADER77 Source?

@TherionWare @NotEvolution1 Hundreds

@NotEvolution1 I see many maladapted creatures on X every day...

Evolutionism is obviously false

@NotEvolution1 Found one!

@KenElderReal1 @054durin @Tsar_Martyr Don't have a worldview? Where did he claim that? How worldview just doesn't involve just one less god than yours does.

@054durin @Tsar_Martyr How convenient, you don't have a worldview. You don't believe the universe is unguided? You don't believe cause and effect determines the universe? Uh huh

@MartinTweats Incoherent. Your god is literally nothing.

If you're asking for a picture of God, then your ask uses the wrong tool for the job. Pictures capture photons bouncing of material objects, i.e., light. If photons bounce off God, then it follows as a corollary that God material. Therefore, if you could take a picture of God, then it would prove that God exists materially, rather than immaterially. But if God is material, then He is not God, as material implies contingent, i.e., it is composite, has extension, volume, relation, mass and exists in spacetime. However, God can only be God if he exists necessarily as actus purus, rather than contingently. Therefore, it is the case that: 1. To ask for a picture of God is using the wrong tool, it's like asking for proof that the colour blue smells like steak & kidney pie. 2. To reject God on this basis does not refute the existence of God, it simply proves that you lack philosophy to ask metaphysical questions about God.