Daniel Packer

Graham Planter doesn’t have a Nazi tattoo. He has a Nazi SS tattoo. The ones they wore in the death camps. So it’s not just about Nazi ideology, it’s the tattoo the people planning and executing the Holocaust had. If I had somehow “accidentally” gotten a tattoo like that I would immediately drop what I was doing and get it lasered off my body in extreme shame. Platner described it to others proudly as his “Nazi-style” tattoo, according to CNN. Go look at my tweets when Nazis marched on Charlottesville. I criticized Trump relentlessly for his weak response and “both sides” nonsense. That was a refusal to condemn. What Democrats are doing is worse. We’re embracing this person as our standard bearer for the Senate.

My mother-in-law got Streits instead of Yehuda this year, and now I have a year to come up with a reason why we aren't going to be there next year. Divorce would be a last resort, but I'm open to anything.

@yashar you're about 2 years late here, at one point it had a market cap well over $1 billion.

There’s a MOG coin now? Is that a Clavicular thing?

@TheRideshareGuy yes (and they should do both)! Taking a decade to fix a sidewalk is embarrassing, our kids are forced to take their scooters into the street for safety...

I'd rather they fix the sidewalks!

@AlZeidenfeld The goal was a bad goal then, because it let them continue funding terror.

@DanielPacker It was a GOOD deal as it lead to a denuclearized Iran which would have avoided this bullshit war we're currently dealing with. It accomplished its goal, well.

**Yes, the Iran nuclear deal (formally the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA) was generally working as intended before President Trump withdrew the United States from it in May 2018.** The JCPOA, implemented in January 2016, limited Iran's nuclear program (e.g., capping uranium enrichment at 3.67%, restricting centrifuge numbers and stockpiles, and modifying facilities) in exchange for sanctions relief. Its core goal was to extend Iran's "breakout time"—the time needed to produce enough fissile material for one nuclear weapon—to at least one year, while providing robust international monitoring. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the independent UN nuclear watchdog responsible for verification, repeatedly certified Iran's compliance in quarterly reports leading up to May 2018. For example: - Iran stayed within limits on enriched uranium stockpiles (e.g., below 300 kg of low-enriched uranium hexafluoride). - Heavy water stockpiles remained under the 130-ton cap (with minor, quickly resolved exceedances addressed). - IAEA inspectors had access to declared sites and confirmed no major violations. There were occasional small technical issues (e.g., brief heavy water overages), but these were minor, addressed promptly, and did not indicate systemic non-compliance or weapons pursuit. U.S. intelligence assessments and statements from European allies (France, Germany, UK) also affirmed that Iran was meeting its nuclear obligations under the deal. The deal had effectively rolled back Iran's program: Iran removed two-thirds of its centrifuges (over 13,000), shipped out most of its enriched uranium stockpile, and filled the core of the Arak reactor to prevent plutonium production. This extended the breakout time to roughly one year (from a pre-deal estimate of months), providing greater confidence that Iran was not advancing toward a nuclear weapon. Critics (including Trump administration officials and some analysts) argued the deal was flawed because it did not address Iran's ballistic missiles, regional activities (e.g., support for proxies), or "sunset" provisions (some limits expiring after 10–15 years). They also raised concerns about possible undeclared past military dimensions or access to military sites. However, these were not violations of the JCPOA's nuclear terms, and the IAEA did not find evidence of diversion to weapons development during the compliance period. In short, on the nuclear front—its primary focus—the deal was functioning effectively: Iran's program was constrained, monitored, and non-weaponized, according to the IAEA and most international observers. After the U.S. withdrawal and reimposition of sanctions, Iran began incrementally breaching limits starting in 2019, leading to the current much shorter breakout time (now estimated in weeks or less).

@ThaRhymeKing @HanShawnity For one, his brother has been dead for decades.

@HanShawnity Why is it “insane” to believe Netanyahu was killed?

It's fascinating to me how the people who claim to question everything will fall for the dumbest propaganda on the internet. Quite a juxtaposition. We've made the dumbest people famous.

@MaxMannis 2 more Italy runs and it's over (unless some weird extra innings thing, I think)!

You’re welcome

Not exactly loving how low-scoring this start has been…

@scottlincicome No, I just like playing with my kids outside in the afternoons! I actually prefer DST and then in winters a double DST.

Sounds about right to me.

@JamesSurowiecki It's a very tall task, but I'm confident that at the end of the day, the world will blame any negative outcomes on the Jews.

@JamesSurowiecki I think that's ridiculous, he says a lot of things so it's hard/impossible to know what's real. You only do this if it's actually going to change the safety situation, the world would be safer without the Iranian regime.

The nuclear program was already obliterated, we were told. And unless you replace the regime - which would require boots on the ground and a long occupation - what prevents Iran from just buying more missiles and drones and re-building factories after the bombing ends?

@ArminRosen It doesn't actually need to be closed: "80% or greater decrease in the 7 day moving average of commercial vessel transits (both cargo and tanker ships) on a given date when compared to the seven-day moving average 30 days prior"

What makes anyone think they'll have the military capability of doing that four weeks from now x.com/unusual_whales…

Danser sur I will survive, en pleine guerre, dans un abri à Tel Aviv, célébrer la joie, la vie, et la victoire éternelle du peuple juif sur ceux qui veulent l'éliminer à chaque génération Ne serais-ce pas notre ADN finalement ? עם ישראל חי! Video leah.marciano sur instagram

@neilbodl What if there were 100 uninstalls yesterday and 395 uninstalls today?

If it was installs I could understand this . But can their not only be 100% max when it comes to uninstalls

@MaxMannis only having 2 challenges in a game where there were at least SIX missed calls is a problem. Maybe you should have to miss 2 in a row in order to lose them.

The Yankees successfully challenged six (!!!) ball/strike calls today before they got two incorrect I'm really interested to see if that becomes more likely than we may realize this season. There will probably be games with hardly any challenges, but are we underestimating the likelihood of games with AWFUL umps where we see a TON?

@jbarro Spoiler alert! I haven't seen it yet!

On Central Air this week, we discussed the plot twist in The Sound of Music where Maria learns to her shock that she is Jewish, requiring her to both quit being a nun and flee the Nazis centralairpodcast.com/p/the-von-trap…

@beaniemaxi My freshman year of college (20ish years ago), I made several thousand dollars playing "free cell" online. Bring it back!

Reminds me of like 25 years ago and I was pretty deep into the gaming industry, and everybody was saying that sports and casino betting will be displaced by skill based gaming. It became a hot trend for awhile just like prediction markets are now. But never really quite took off.

I’m pretty bearish on prediction markets. Other than a major event like a US Presidential election or sporting events (where there’s no in-game liquidity), I really don’t think there’s much demand for betting on random things. It’s also not clear if sports is legally defensible.

Prop 13 is the second dumbest thing I've ever heard, the fact that it passes down to heirs is the dumbest.

Chag Sameach @sammorril