Del Bigtree

🚨 LIVE: Sen. Ron Johnson examines how Biden health officials handled COVID-19 vaccine safety signals. New findings allege the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention missed key warning signs. x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

Everyone head over to @HighWireTalk to watch the stream of @SenRonJohnson’s hearing. 2:30 PM ET

CDC. Whistleblower. Fraud. They said it would end his career, but it exposed something BIGGER. When you ask the room who’s been affected and 75% of the room stands up, maybe it’s not “rare.” Controversial means you’re flying right over the target. Good work.

"A life well lived is God & Mother Nature obeyed,” said Weston A. Price. But when EGO + POWER decide they’re here to “save” humanity….. That’s a recipe for disaster. Humanity doesn’t need saving AND Bill Gates is NOT a doctor.

Check out my interview this morning about The People vs. Poison. newsnationnow.com/video/proteste…

Had a fantastic interview with @RedactedNews today - we need to keep this issue front and center. What we eat (and whether it's poisoned!) is absolutely critical to our health.

Started Rally Day with a 6:45 am live interview on News Nation. See you all at SCOTUS! People Vs Poison. Live streaming at TheHighWire.com

Prayers going out for all in attendance after the incident at the White House Correspondents' Dinner. We need to move back to civility.

🚨LIVE: EP 473 | Dr. William Shaw reveals new research linking glyphosate to autism and autoimmune disease. U.S. military announces an end to the flu shot mandate. Plus, Zen Honeycutt joins ahead of the People vs. Poison rally. x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

By now, you guys have all seen the Brady Bunch episode where they all got the measles (complete with a laugh track) Now I get to watch every measles story blame anyone and everyone but the vaccine program itself. The program failed. Baby boomers had real measles, built real lifetime immunity, and they were the last genuine foundation of herd immunity this country ever had. They are aging out. What replaces them is a generation that got a shot that was never going to do what natural immunity does, that wanes, that requires boosters, that has been given to hundreds of millions of people while the virus keeps running the same cycles it always ran. Fifty years. The promise was eradication. The disease is still here. The shot doesn't last, and the people whose immunity actually lasted are leaving, and there is no honest accounting anywhere in mainstream media for what that means. So, blame the unvaccinated. Blame me. Blame Bobby. But you should really be blaming a useless vaccine that does nothing they said it would and everything they said it wouldn't.

I’m going LIVE on Dr Drew at the top of the hour 7pm ET. This should be a fun discussion. See you there!!

Something happened in a Massachusetts federal courtroom that I can't stop thinking about, even now, even knowing what ICAN was able to do after, even knowing the charter got amended and we moved the ball. I can't just let it go. Think about this: The American Academy of Pediatrics sued Robert Kennedy Jr. and HHS. And what they were suing over, the thing they argued constituted harm, was the possibility that doctors might get to have a conversation with their patients about vaccines. That's what they wanted stopped. Shared decision-making. The radical idea that a pediatrician and a parent might sit down together and talk about what's right for that specific child. Now, the AAP takes money from pharmaceutical companies. That's documented. So when they go to federal court to protect the full 54-vaccine mandate, you have to ask who they're really representing in that room. It is not the pediatricians. It is not the children. The judge agreed with them. And then he went further, declaring that Kennedy's advisory committee was flawed, specifically because it didn't have enough members with financial ties to the vaccine industry. He said, in effect, that the people who profit from the schedule have a right to vote on the schedule. An activist judge handed pharma a structural guarantee, a legal argument that you cannot reform the advisory process without their seat at the table. We got the charter amended, and that matters. But what was said out loud in that courtroom, I don't think we should forget what that judge was willing to put his name on.

BREAKING: Annual influenza vaccine now a voluntary for all Active and Reserve Service members and Department of War civilian personnel! Thank you @SecWar! Every word of what Secretary Hegseth says below has equal weight for all vaccines. Too bad Trump's pick to head the CDC does not understand liberty and first amendment rights...

Under the greatest propaganda machine in human history, an international attack by every government in the world, the WHO, the WEF, the UN, all of them in lockstep with a 24-hour news cycle pounding you every single day, 30% of the world still said oh hell no. Think about what that means. Under that kind of pressure, with your job on the line, with your ability to provide for your family on the line, 30% of people around the world held the line. In England, experts told me 30% denied receiving a single COVID vaccine. Someone from Denmark said the same. Someone from Finland. America is right about the same. I was just in Europe weeks ago and that number kept coming up everywhere I went. That is a rebellion army. That is an international movement that already knows the truth. 30% changes governments. And then think about the 70% who did get that vaccine. How many of them actually wanted it? How many got it under duress because they had no other choice? I think there is at least another 20% in there who know they were lied to and are just waiting for permission to say it out loud. I think at least half the world knows. We have got to start speaking loudly, every one of us, and speaking proudly, because if we don't we are going to lose free speech and we are going to lose this movement, and this movement can make change not just in America but around the world. AnInconvenientStudy.com @SteveDeaceShow

This is UGE!!!!

The reporter files, continued...I have some questions. Why is it that mainstream media and our government seem to only care about the children getting vaccines and the risk to them if they don't? Why don't they ever write about the known risks, the known warning labels wrapped around these products, the children that are killed and permanently injured every single year by vaccines? Why are we not allowed to talk about the kids that are injured, that we try to advocate for every day? Why are we not allowed to do the science to find out if there is a genetic disposition that makes them more vulnerable? Why can't we pretest kids for their titers? Why can't we do more to stop vaccine injury? Why is Robert Kennedy Jr. ridiculed for caring about this group of children, no matter how small they may be? Why am I ridiculed for wanting them to be protected? All of these questions should be on the table... I asked this reporter to get their publication to care about kids being injured. Because we are reading article after article that will not recognize these injuries even though they are written on the warning labels of the products themselves, and people are losing their faith in mainstream news and in the regulatory agencies because of it. The elephant in the room is impossible to ignore forever. The entire population is moving in this direction, and we are gaining ground with people asking these questions of their pediatricians every single day.

More from the conversation with the journalist I had the other day... The reason I am so transparent on all of this, is because we are only going to fix this problem if reporters start reporting on it. You have to stop supporting an industry that lies and loses lawsuits all the time. The answer to that cannot be "I'm sorry you're so corrupt, I'm sorry you're losing, so we're going to protect you from liability. " The answer has to be that all of media has a problem with the fact that this industry is injuring children and doesn't seem to care. I understand the government's concern. They are worried there may be too many injuries for this to survive in court, that they won't be able to afford it. And that is motivation enough for scientists who care more about protecting the vaccine program than the truth, who don't want to go back to the 1980s where the industry might walk away. But really, if the industry walks away because their product is causing all these injuries, did we want to be taking it anyway? They don't walk away from their drugs when those cause injuries. We watch them run risk profiles, decide to run Vioxx knowing it causes heart attacks, knowing they're going to make enough money before anyone figures it out. What makes us think they are not making those same calculations with vaccines? And how would we ever know if we can never get them into a courtroom, never have discovery, never see what they actually know about the risks of these products? I want every journalist to think about the implications of taking one of the most dangerous industries in the world and protecting them from ever having to do proper science. This is such a dangerous situation. And one of the only ways out of it is if reporters start asking the real questions.

Had another interview with a reporter the other day and they asked me about the studies the government has done on the shots collectively given to infants in the first year of life, and whether they used a proper control group of children who didn't receive those shots. These studies are such a joke. What they end up doing with MMR, for instance, is saying they took children who got all the vaccines except MMR, then all the vaccines plus MMR, and didn't see a statistically significant uptick in autism, and therefore MMR doesn't cause autism. And that study is fine, if all the other vaccines have already been proven not to cause autism. Then you have a proper control group. But the Institute of Medicine states clearly there is no study that isolates the DTaP vaccine. And the CDC has suspected DTaP since the 1986 Act, which literally listed diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis as being associated with autism and as the first thing that should be investigated once they took on the liability. That investigation has never happened. I think we should ask ourselves why. Because if DTaP causes autism, it erases the validity of the MMR study entirely. Your control group had a product in it that can cause autism. That is the problem with the science that has been done so far. I have had both Dr. Stanley Plotkin and Kathryn Edwards on the stand in front of @AaronSiriSG, two of the most iconic figures in the vaccine space. When asked, listing every vaccine one by one, "Do you have a study showing it doesn't cause autism?" Kathryn Edwards had none. Stanley Plotkin stated the same thing under oath. What they both explained is that they made an assumption that vaccines don't cause autism. I have that on video on my website. These are the authors of Plotkin's Vaccines, considered the bible on vaccinations. So if your top vaccine scientists cannot provide a single study under oath, why are newspapers reporting there are mountains of evidence? I sued the CDC. I said show me the trials you relied upon for the first six vaccines in the first six months of life to conclude they don't cause autism. They had zero. Not for Hepatitis B. Not for polio. Not for DTaP. Zero. There is no two or three year placebo trial for these products like you would see with every other drug. And that is not an accident. Causation is established in a placebo trial. If you skip that trial, you remove your ability to ever get to causation. You are permanently stuck in the land of "associated with." And the agency that is required to do the safety studies is the same agency defending itself in court against me. They are not doing the science, so you cannot win. That is where we are.

🇺🇸 I’m honored to be hosting Day 1 of the Better Way Conference – USA, May 30–31, in Rhode Island. The goal is simple: change the future of health. We’re bringing together some of the most important voices in medicine, science, law, journalism, and policy who are leading the global conversation around medical freedom and healthcare reform. Speakers include Dr. Tess Lawrie, Dr. Bret Weinstein, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Mary Holland, Kevin McKernan, and many more. On May 30th, we’ll also host a special screening of ICAN’s film An Inconvenient Study - an investigation into how vaccine decision-making really happens behind the scenes. If you care about the future of healthcare and want to be part of building something better, I hope you’ll join us. 🎟 Tickets start at $55 Use code BIGTREE10 for 10% off betterwayconference.org

What is happening right now with Bayer and Monsanto at the Supreme Court is the same story we have been telling about vaccines for twenty years, and it is playing out again in real time. They are losing billions in lawsuits because their pesticides are causing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. So instead of making a safer product, they are asking the government for liability protection. And our own Department of Justice is helping them make that case. This is exactly what happened with vaccines. The manufacturers were losing money over death and injury. The government didn't say go back and fix it. They said we will protect you. And now an entire generation of children is living with the consequences of that decision, with no legal recourse for their families. I trust Bobby Kennedy and the work he is doing, but we are watching complications inside this administration and I think people need to pay attention to this one. I can't imagine anyone walking down the street wants to give pesticide companies a free ride when their product is causing cancer and poisoning our children.