Eric Bintner

2.3K posts

Eric Bintner

Eric Bintner

@EricBintner

creative technology and product innovation, but I use Twitter mostly for customer service :/

Brooklyn Joined Ekim 2009
51 Following31 Followers
Eric Bintner
Eric Bintner@EricBintner·
@Winstonsmom55 It’s like the time when I didn’t like the homeless guy on my street and I called Guy Ferrari and he annoyed the guy to death. I also made up that story.
English
0
0
0
4
Eric Bintner
Eric Bintner@EricBintner·
@Winstonsmom55 @Mollyploofkins We are but his followers seem to think he’s Superman when he’s more likely to fall on a ramp. To be specific it’s an attack on his fragile ego and calling him out on fabricated perceptions. You know, the kind of behavior other authoritarian bastards participate in.
English
0
0
4
62
Molly Ploofkins
Molly Ploofkins@Mollyploofkins·
Estimate Trump's current weight
Molly Ploofkins tweet media
English
2.9K
211
812
112.2K
Eric Bintner
Eric Bintner@EricBintner·
@sirDukeDevin We are continuing to spiral after Reagan still. All hope is lost. These turds claim the billionaire class built by siphoning off middle class “earned it” — they seriously say the billionaires earned it after we gave them more money via Reaganomics and it never trickled down.
English
0
0
0
3
Devin Duke
Devin Duke@sirDukeDevin·
Will America ever recover?
Devin Duke tweet media
English
4.3K
694
2.3K
125.3K
Eric Bintner
Eric Bintner@EricBintner·
@jk_rowling You defined normality of physical sex. Identity is not the same. It’s like you have absolute idealism & reject bell curves, outliers, hormonal imbalances & various other scenarios so you can uphold a platonic ideal. Why do you hate people who don’t fit your ideal perfection?
English
0
0
0
22
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
Being biologically female means having a body that is observably organised to produce large gametes (eggs), as opposed to a body organised to produce small gametes (sperm). A woman is female whether her eggs have been fertilised or not. A man can never be female.
J.K. Rowling tweet media
English
2.3K
10.9K
81.9K
1.6M
Irushi
Irushi@Im_IrushiK·
Developers, be honest What's harder than coding?
English
161
4
64
12.4K
Priya
Priya@naturedotcom·
What's coming next after Al?
English
341
8
118
14.9K
trisa
trisa@trisaleon·
Can you think of an answer to this qestion ?🤔
trisa tweet media
English
6.6K
84
1.1K
398.5K
Eric Bintner
Eric Bintner@EricBintner·
@hiarun02 Mine stopped working completely in early April, then I began working again just recently except now it claims it’s always busy. But it was very cool for the 3 weeks it worked.
English
1
0
4
1.6K
Arun
Arun@hiarun02·
I think Google is shutting down AntiGravity. There aren't any developers working on it, are there?
Arun tweet media
English
319
26
2.2K
477.6K
Eric Bintner
Eric Bintner@EricBintner·
@dr_cintas “Taste” is in this context is visual aesthetic design decisions packaged for reuse. It’s still not a design construct.
English
0
0
0
353
Alvaro Cintas
Alvaro Cintas@dr_cintas·
Stop typing “make it look modern”. There are 2,000+ 𝗗𝗘𝗦𝗜𝗚𝗡.𝗺𝗱 files from top products. Colors. Typography. Spacing. Component rules. All packed into a single Markdown file your AI reads before it generates anything. → Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, Bolt → 100% Free to use Pick a style you like. Drop it in your repo.
English
78
221
2.3K
272.9K
Mr. Nobody
Mr. Nobody@MmisterNobody·
So what is this look called?
Mr. Nobody tweet media
English
2.1K
192
1.5K
76.5K
Eric Bintner
Eric Bintner@EricBintner·
@andrewchen Assuming design is unimportant, sure. Or are you suggesting project management is just another name for designer, because that’s weird.
English
0
0
0
58
andrew chen
andrew chen@andrewchen·
bullish on the PM role quietly becoming the most important role in tech again when anyone can build, the person who decides WHAT to build becomes the bottleneck
English
283
181
2.3K
230.2K
Om Patel
Om Patel@om_patel5·
RESEARCHERS JUST BUILT AN AI MODEL TRAINED ONLY ON TEXT FROM BEFORE 1931 it's called talkie. 13 billion parameters, trained exclusively on text published before december 31, 1930 its worldview is completely frozen in time the reason this matters: every major AI model today (GPT, claude, gemini, llama) was trained on the modern web. that makes it almost impossible to tell if these models actually reason or if they just memorized the answers from their training data talkie breaks that completely because it has never seen any modern information the crazy part: talkie can learn to write python code from just a few examples you show it in the prompt. despite having ZERO modern code in its training data. it's figuring out programming from 19th century mathematics texts. that's ACTUAL reasoning claude sonnet 4.6 was used as the judge in talkie's reinforcement learning pipeline. claude opus 4.6 generated the synthetic conversations used in fine tuning. a modern AI was used to train a model that's supposed to be frozen in 1930 the team already flagged this as a contamination risk they want to eliminate in future versions what they're using it to study: > long range forecasting. how well can a model "predict" the future from a frozen vantage point > invention. can it develop ideas that didn't exist until after its knowledge cutoff > LLM identity. what makes a model itself vs what's just patterns absorbed from the web alec radford built this. the same guy behind GPT, CLIP, and whisper both models are open source on hugging face. they're already planning a GPT-3 scale vintage model later this year an AI that has never seen the modern world can still reason its way to writing code. THAT alone tells you more about intelligence than any benchmark ever will
Om Patel tweet media
English
171
430
3K
248.3K
Eric Bintner
Eric Bintner@EricBintner·
@om_patel5 The left border in the “designed” version is the em-dash of generated UI
English
0
0
0
714
Om Patel
Om Patel@om_patel5·
CLAUDE DESIGN IS SO GOOD IT TURNS ANY GENERIC AI GENERATED UI INTO A FULLY POLISHED APP this guy took a generic vibe coded dashboard and shipped a fully polished version in under 15 minutes the spacing, radius, typography, color, and density are all tweakable without rewriting a single component you can finally stop prompting "make it look better" 100 times and get the same result back anyway the gap between a rough prototype and something you'd ship to users just got way smaller hopefully we start seeing ui's that aren't using ai generated gradients and the same styles/fonts anymore
Om Patel tweet mediaOm Patel tweet media
English
9
0
72
13.1K
Eric Bintner
Eric Bintner@EricBintner·
@Ric_RTP This really isn’t news to us computer programmers. We’ve been unemployed long enough to lose our homes already.
English
0
0
0
1
Ricardo
Ricardo@Ric_RTP·
Goldman Sachs just published the list of jobs AI will eliminate first. 300 million jobs globally. 25% of all US work hours. And that's not in 10 years, it's starting NOW. Highest risk of displacement according to Goldman: 1. Computer programmers 2. Accountants 3. Auditors 4. Legal assistants 5. Administrative assistants 6. Customer service reps 7. Telemarketers 8. Proofreaders 9. Copy editors 10. Credit analysts. 46% of all office and administrative tasks can be automated. 44% of legal work. 37% of architecture and engineering. 36% of science. 35% of business and finance. These aren't warehouse jobs. These aren't factory floor positions. These are the careers parents told their kids to pursue. "Go to college. Get a degree. Get a desk job. You'll be safe." Goldman Sachs just told you that desk is getting emptied. And the data is already showing up in real time: Tech employment as a share of the US economy has dropped below its long-term trend for the first time since records began. Marketing consulting, graphic design, office administration, and call centers are all seeing employment growth fall below trend. Younger workers are getting hit first and hardest. Goldman's lead economist said it directly: "The big story in 2026 in labor will be AI." But here's what the report doesn't mention: Goldman Sachs is one of the biggest investors in the companies BUILDING the AI that eliminates these jobs. They underwrote OpenAI's funding rounds. They're advising on the $700 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year. They profit from every merger, every capex deal, every stock offering tied to AI. The same bank telling you 300 million jobs are at risk is making billions helping the companies that will take them. And the corporate playbook is already locked in: Meta is firing 16,000 people. 20% of its entire workforce. While doubling AI spending to $135 billion. Stock went up 3% on the announcement. Block fired 40% of its staff. Stock surged 24%. Atlassian cut 10%. Same pattern. Over 61,000 AI-linked layoffs since November. 764 people per day losing their jobs in tech alone. Every single time a company announces mass layoffs and says "AI," the stock price goes up. Wall Street has created a system where firing humans is the most profitable announcement a CEO can make. Goldman's report says the jobs most PROTECTED from AI are air traffic controllers, chief executives, radiologists, pharmacists, and members of the clergy. Notice who's safe? The people at the top and the people praying. Everyone in the middle is exposed. The entry-level white-collar worker who spent four years and $200,000 on a degree is now competing against software that works 24/7, never takes vacation, never asks for a raise, and improves every single week. Goldman even admits younger workers in their 20s and 30s entering knowledge and content creation sectors will be "most affected." The generation that was told AI would make their lives better is the one getting displaced by it first. And it gets even WORSE: Goldman says if this displacement happens faster than their 10 year base case, the economic impact "could be much larger." Basically: if companies move fast, which they already are, the fallout will be worse than their projections. They're already moving fast. $700 billion in AI infrastructure this year. Mass layoffs at every major tech company. Stock prices rewarding every single one. The report is 50 pages of data telling you exactly what's coming. Most people won't read past the headline. But you just did.
English
161
392
978
235.5K
Maryann Krueger
Maryann Krueger@KruegerGrammy·
@EYakoby It's so telling when Dems just jump to a conclusion by a headline! He left, he was not fired. He is starting his own consulting firm. These are unfortunately the same people who have the right to cancel our vote.
English
4
0
32
2.7K
Eyal Yakoby
Eyal Yakoby@EYakoby·
BREAKING: Buckley Carlson, son of Tucker Carlson, is no longer employed by the White House where he served as Deputy Press Secretary to Vice President JD Vance.
English
1.1K
2.9K
20.4K
558.6K
Eric Bintner
Eric Bintner@EricBintner·
@TreyAmerica @chiky_handlr It’s true. Some people think insults are good argumentation. Other people think it’s a good domestic and international diplomacy strategy.
English
0
0
0
29
chiky handler
chiky handler@chiky_handlr·
Is it just me, or does it feel like Americans are finally waking up to the fact he is just a scared, stupid, pathetic little boy who is way in over his head, and has absolutely no idea what he's doing?
chiky handler tweet media
English
8.4K
3.5K
14.2K
234.5K
Iran News 24
Iran News 24@IRanMediaco·
TRUMP: “Open the strait by 8 p.m. or I'll end your civilization” IRAN: “No.” TRUMP: “Okay, fine. You want to play hardball, we'll play hardball. How about I agree to all of your terms?” IRAN: “Yes.” TRUMP: “Then we have a deal, losers.”
English
1.3K
5.4K
46.3K
1.9M