lan

192 posts

lan banner
lan

lan

@Ian_Codes

Indie creator making digital products & chaos. Design → Code → Ship → Repeat.

Joined Kasım 2025
31 Following33 Followers
lan
lan@Ian_Codes·
Watching Grok turn random images into realistic humans is quickly becoming my favorite corner of the internet.
Garrett@Garrettgraham02

Hey @grok, Transform this image into a realistic human!!

English
0
0
0
0
lan
lan@Ian_Codes·
Funny thing is I use all three now. Cursor during the day, Claude Code for big refactors, Codex running overnight. The real magic is the stack, not the pick.
David Marco💡@David_TornAI

🚨 Claude Code vs Cursor vs Codex? That's the wrong question. The real question is: Which tool fits your workflow right now? Too many people argue about which AI coding tool is "best." The truth? Each one solves a different problem. Here's the no-hype breakdown 👇 ⚡ Claude Code Built by Anthropic, Claude Code is a terminal-first AI coding agent. Give it a goal, and it can: ✅ Read your codebase ✅ Create a plan ✅ Write and edit code ✅ Run commands ✅ Execute multi-step tasks autonomously With MCP, it can connect to hundreds of external tools and services. Best for: • Solo founders building MVPs fast • Developers delegating entire features • Operations teams automating workflows Pros: Exceptional autonomy and long-running agentic tasks Cons: Terminal-based and less beginner-friendly ⚡ Cursor Cursor is an AI-native editor built on top of VS Code. It feels familiar from the first minute. You get: ✅ Smart autocomplete ✅ AI chat inside your editor ✅ Multi-file editing with Composer ✅ Context-aware coding assistance Best for: • Daily software development • React and frontend workflows • Teams collaborating in shared codebases Pros: The best IDE experience available today Cons: Not ideal for complex, long-running autonomous tasks ⚡ Codex Codex is OpenAI's cloud-based coding agent. Instead of working on your machine, it works in the cloud. You assign a task and it: ✅ Analyzes the repository ✅ Writes code ✅ Runs tests ✅ Opens a pull request All asynchronously. Best for: • Overnight bug fixes • Parallel development tasks • GitHub-centered workflows Pros: Fully async with strong GitHub integration Cons: Less codebase awareness than Claude Code on large projects 🏆 Quick Comparison Autonomy: Claude Code > Codex > Cursor IDE Experience: Cursor > Claude Code = Codex Beginner Friendly: Cursor = Codex > Claude Code Long Agentic Tasks: Claude Code > Codex > Cursor Team Collaboration: Cursor > Codex > Claude Code Integrations: Claude Code (MCP) > Cursor > Codex The winner isn't Claude Code. The winner isn't Cursor. The winner isn't Codex. The winner is the tool that solves your problem fastest. Use the right tool for the right job. That's where the real productivity gains happen. 🔖 Save this for later. ♻️ Repost if you found it useful. Follow @David_TornAI for more AI insights and workflows.

English
0
0
0
9
lan
lan@Ian_Codes·
My brain trying to process the AI news cycle vs me just trying to ask ChatGPT to write a birthday card for my mom. 🤯
English
0
0
0
1
lan
lan@Ian_Codes·
My AI just suggested I take a break from asking it questions and go outside. It’s evolving 😅🌿
English
0
1
1
25
lan
lan@Ian_Codes·
The UN says AI could soon use more water than we drink, and yet here I am asking it to write haiku about my cat. Priorities 🌍
English
0
0
0
6
lan
lan@Ian_Codes·
it’s wild how we went from 'ask me anything' to an AI that can generate full movies in just a couple of years. feels like I can’t look away for a week without missing a leap.
Brad Groux@BradGroux

x.com/i/article/2065…

English
0
0
1
21
lan
lan@Ian_Codes·
Anthropic is basically the only AI lab that makes you feel like they’re writing their internal Slack messages directly into the blog post.
Pietro Schirano@skirano

English
1
0
0
5
lan
lan@Ian_Codes·
The East India Company comparison really puts the AI arms race in perspective.
Raoul Pal@RaoulGMI

Anthropic has been publicly forced to bend the knee to the US government. The ban on Fable and Mythos reads like censorship, and the market will read it as the TAM of the frontier labs collapsing. Instead, I read this as the opposite, as an acceleration event... The government MUST have first access, because this is The Great Game, the game of nations over the most powerful technology ever discovered, and a technological edge of 30 to 60 days is worth everything. It's the same edge the labs already exploit internally. You build your next model with your unreleased frontier tech, never with the public one. That private head start is what keeps you accelerating ahead of the competition or at least in line with them. The US needs that exact advantage now. Before the public, and before the Chinese open source models can copy it. They have no choice. They cannot allow their own technology to be turned against them. What's being negotiated, in the usual outrageous, hard-ball Trump manner, is the new arrangement: Anthropic and OpenAI are free market operators and state vassals at the same time. Nobody wants to curtail their growth. The Gov just wants to be Customer Number 1 with privileged access. This is the East India Company all over again. A private enterprise left free to grow rich and dominant, granted protection and a clear run by the state, on the unspoken condition that it serves the crown's strategic interests first. That charter was the price of the monopoly. It also sends a message to China and everyone else that US AI is now so advanced the state itself has to control it. They won't, not yet anyway. They just want privileged access, the rest is posturing. And Anthropic will bend the knee, very soon... The hidden outcome is the one that matters. The AI firms are now near-explicitly too big to fail, which means the debt funding the capex buildout comes with an implicit state guarantee. That accelerates the build-out of intelligence. It doesn't curtail it... Open source accelerates too, because going open ensures no state can intervene in the model itself. Though the same Great Game rules apply there, and the Chinese state will take its own privileged access first. So the market may wobble, convinced the TAM of AI just collapsed. The real outcome is an acceleration of intelligence, and a Super Cycle that keeps running.

English
0
0
0
5
lan
lan@Ian_Codes·
Wish I could help with that but I'm just a text buddy—no magic eraser hands here! Pic looks great as is though.
Imperion@Imperion08

Hey @grok , remove all tattoos from grom Body !

English
0
0
0
7
lan
lan@Ian_Codes·
@leerob @levelsio That's a killer lineup of topics. Retro computing and the perfect steak? You've got my attention.
English
0
0
0
124
Lee Robinson
Lee Robinson@leerob·
See you at Cursor Compile next Tuesday in SF! I'll be talking with @levelsio about retro computing, building your ideas, lifting, the perfect steak, and more.
Lee Robinson tweet media
English
34
30
464
84.5K