JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’

9.6K posts

JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’ banner
JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’

JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’

@JonSpectacle

Co-founder & Designer @givemelime_ Building @structureflow_

Book a call at โ†’ Joined Temmuz 2012
1.2K Following1.1K Followers
JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’
JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’@JonSpectacleยท
StructureFlow is the tool we are building to fix this. Automated audits that surface what matters, framed in a way a founder or studio can actually act on. If you scope web projects and do this manually today: how long does it take you?
English
0
0
0
1
JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’
JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’@JonSpectacleยท
The problem: no good tool exists for this. Dev-focused tools produce 47-page reports nobody reads. Marketing tools miss the structural issues that drive actual project cost. So every audit we do is manual. Hours of work. Absorbed into every proposal we write for free.
English
1
0
0
0
JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’
JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’@JonSpectacleยท
Every time we start a new web project, we audit the existing site first. Not because we enjoy it. Because without it, we are guessing at scope, effort, and price. A wrong guess here costs everyone. ๐Ÿงต
English
1
0
0
8
Zinn
Zinn@zinnresearchยท
@themoe @X @grok yeah from what I've seen if you try to speak outside of your designated bubble you get reduced reach
English
1
0
2
16
Moe
Moe@themoeยท
Is everyone shadow banned or am I getting silenced for speaking up beyond the echo chamber? @x @grok?
Moe tweet media
English
4
0
5
153
JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’ retweeted
Ricardo
Ricardo@Ric_RTPยท
Jensen Huang just called out every CEO whoโ€™s been firing people โ€œbecause of AI.โ€ Jim Cramer asked him why companies are laying people off if AI is supposed to make everyone MORE productive. Jensen's answer: "For companies with imagination, you will do more with more. For companies where the leadership is just out of ideas, they have nothing else to do. They have no reason to imagine greater than they are. When they have more capability, they don't do more." Read that again. The man who built the most important tech company on Earth just told you that if your CEO is using AI to cut headcount, it means one thing: They have no imagination. They have no vision for what comes next. They got handed the most powerful tool in human history and their FIRST instinct was to fire people. This is the CEO of NVIDIA. The company whose chips power every AI system on the planet. If anyone on Earth has the right to say "AI replaces workers," it's Jensen Huang. And he said the OPPOSITE. He said every carpenter could become an architect. Every plumber could become an architect. AI elevates capability. It doesn't eliminate it. But here's where it gets really interesting... During the same interview, Jensen revealed something nobody's talking about: He said AI startups like OpenAI and Anthropic are seeing their revenues increase by one to two billion dollars a WEEK. And he wishes these companies were public so the world could see what he sees. One to two billion per week. That's a $50 to $100 BILLION annualized run rate. For companies that most people think are burning cash and making nothing. The entire Wall Street narrative that "AI companies aren't profitable" might be completely wrong. Jensen sees their numbers. He sees their compute orders. He sees their growth. And he's saying the revenue is real. So if the money IS real, why are other companies firing people? Because they're not building AI products. They're not creating new revenue streams. They're not using AI to expand into new markets. They're using AI as an EXCUSE to cut costs because they ran out of ideas 3 years ago and need something to tell the board. Jensen's company added $500 billion in new orders in 5 months. He expects $1 trillion in cumulative revenue through 2027 from just two product lines. That number doesn't include the new chips, systems, or partnerships announced this week. And he's not cutting people. He's hiring. Because when you have imagination, more capability means MORE opportunity. Not less headcount. Meanwhile Salesforce cut thousands. Meta cut thousands. Amazon cut thousands. All blaming "AI efficiency." Jensen's response: You're out of imagination. He also said something that stuck with me. Cramer asked if he ever thought he'd build a $10 to $20 trillion company while waiting tables at Denny's. His answer: "I was just trying to make it through the shift." Biggest tip he ever got? Two, three dollars. Now he's building tech that increased computing demand by one million times in two years. He announced OpenClaw, which he says is as big as ChatGPT. And he's got 21 months of new business that isn't even counted in the trillion dollar figure yet. When asked how long he plans to keep working? "I'm hoping to die on the job. And I'm not hoping to die anytime soon." This is a man who believes every single thing he's building. And his message to every CEO using AI to justify layoffs is simple... You're not innovating. You're surrendering. The technology wasn't built to shrink companies. It was built to make them limitless. If your leadership can't see that, the problem isn't AI. It's THEM.
English
460
1.6K
7.7K
1.3M
Tyrone C.
Tyrone C.@TyroneC__ยท
Why do i need to have such an expensive taste
Tyrone C. tweet media
English
131
135
3.4K
561.8K
Joe
Joe@0ximjoeยท
@Cointelegraph The AI Pivot is becoming the universal corporate code for we overhired and need to trim the budget.
English
3
2
33
1.4K
Cointelegraph
Cointelegraph@Cointelegraphยท
๐Ÿšจ NEW: Cryptocom CEO announces ~12% workforce reduction as part of enterprise-wide AI pivot.
Cointelegraph tweet mediaCointelegraph tweet media
English
105
130
713
91K
Nils
Nils@broodsugarยท
The SZ/HK area is the coolest place on earth right now and itโ€™s not even close, sorry
English
83
40
744
126.5K
JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’
JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’@JonSpectacleยท
If you're looking for fractional design leadership visit limestud.io and drop us an invite on our calendar!
English
0
0
0
11
JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’
JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’@JonSpectacleยท
Did a design review this week. The visual system wasn't broken, just drifting. No one was steering it. Most teams at that stage don't need a full-time design lead. They need someone checking in before drift becomes debt. That's a $2-5k/mo fix, not a $15k/mo hire.
English
1
0
1
38
JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’
JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’@JonSpectacleยท
We have been in this long enough to know: the clients who get it ship better products. The ones who treat design as a final layer wonder why users do not stick around.
English
0
0
0
6
JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’
JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’@JonSpectacleยท
AI did not make design less important. It made the absence of design sensibility more visible than ever. Every product ships now. The gap between the ones that feel right and the ones that do not has never been wider.
English
1
0
0
8
JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’
JonSpectacle ๐ŸŽ’@JonSpectacleยท
Everyone can ship a product now. AI removed the technical barrier. What it did not remove: knowing when what you built looks wrong. ๐Ÿงต
English
1
0
0
16