JonSpectacle 🎒

9.6K posts

JonSpectacle 🎒 banner
JonSpectacle 🎒

JonSpectacle 🎒

@JonSpectacle

Co-founder & Designer @givemelime_ Building @structureflow_

Book a call at → Katılım Temmuz 2012
1.2K Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Zinn
Zinn@zinnresearch·
@themoe @X @grok yeah from what I've seen if you try to speak outside of your designated bubble you get reduced reach
English
1
0
2
16
Moe
Moe@themoe·
Is everyone shadow banned or am I getting silenced for speaking up beyond the echo chamber? @x @grok?
Moe tweet media
English
4
0
5
148
JonSpectacle 🎒 retweetledi
Ricardo
Ricardo@Ric_RTP·
Jensen Huang just called out every CEO who’s been firing people “because of AI.” Jim Cramer asked him why companies are laying people off if AI is supposed to make everyone MORE productive. Jensen's answer: "For companies with imagination, you will do more with more. For companies where the leadership is just out of ideas, they have nothing else to do. They have no reason to imagine greater than they are. When they have more capability, they don't do more." Read that again. The man who built the most important tech company on Earth just told you that if your CEO is using AI to cut headcount, it means one thing: They have no imagination. They have no vision for what comes next. They got handed the most powerful tool in human history and their FIRST instinct was to fire people. This is the CEO of NVIDIA. The company whose chips power every AI system on the planet. If anyone on Earth has the right to say "AI replaces workers," it's Jensen Huang. And he said the OPPOSITE. He said every carpenter could become an architect. Every plumber could become an architect. AI elevates capability. It doesn't eliminate it. But here's where it gets really interesting... During the same interview, Jensen revealed something nobody's talking about: He said AI startups like OpenAI and Anthropic are seeing their revenues increase by one to two billion dollars a WEEK. And he wishes these companies were public so the world could see what he sees. One to two billion per week. That's a $50 to $100 BILLION annualized run rate. For companies that most people think are burning cash and making nothing. The entire Wall Street narrative that "AI companies aren't profitable" might be completely wrong. Jensen sees their numbers. He sees their compute orders. He sees their growth. And he's saying the revenue is real. So if the money IS real, why are other companies firing people? Because they're not building AI products. They're not creating new revenue streams. They're not using AI to expand into new markets. They're using AI as an EXCUSE to cut costs because they ran out of ideas 3 years ago and need something to tell the board. Jensen's company added $500 billion in new orders in 5 months. He expects $1 trillion in cumulative revenue through 2027 from just two product lines. That number doesn't include the new chips, systems, or partnerships announced this week. And he's not cutting people. He's hiring. Because when you have imagination, more capability means MORE opportunity. Not less headcount. Meanwhile Salesforce cut thousands. Meta cut thousands. Amazon cut thousands. All blaming "AI efficiency." Jensen's response: You're out of imagination. He also said something that stuck with me. Cramer asked if he ever thought he'd build a $10 to $20 trillion company while waiting tables at Denny's. His answer: "I was just trying to make it through the shift." Biggest tip he ever got? Two, three dollars. Now he's building tech that increased computing demand by one million times in two years. He announced OpenClaw, which he says is as big as ChatGPT. And he's got 21 months of new business that isn't even counted in the trillion dollar figure yet. When asked how long he plans to keep working? "I'm hoping to die on the job. And I'm not hoping to die anytime soon." This is a man who believes every single thing he's building. And his message to every CEO using AI to justify layoffs is simple... You're not innovating. You're surrendering. The technology wasn't built to shrink companies. It was built to make them limitless. If your leadership can't see that, the problem isn't AI. It's THEM.
English
460
1.6K
7.6K
1.3M
Tyrone C.
Tyrone C.@TyroneC__·
Why do i need to have such an expensive taste
Tyrone C. tweet media
English
131
135
3.4K
560.5K
Joe
Joe@0ximjoe·
@Cointelegraph The AI Pivot is becoming the universal corporate code for we overhired and need to trim the budget.
English
3
2
33
1.4K
Cointelegraph
Cointelegraph@Cointelegraph·
🚨 NEW: Cryptocom CEO announces ~12% workforce reduction as part of enterprise-wide AI pivot.
Cointelegraph tweet mediaCointelegraph tweet media
English
105
130
711
90.6K
Nils
Nils@broodsugar·
The SZ/HK area is the coolest place on earth right now and it’s not even close, sorry
English
81
40
730
115.2K
JonSpectacle 🎒
JonSpectacle 🎒@JonSpectacle·
If you're looking for fractional design leadership visit limestud.io and drop us an invite on our calendar!
English
0
0
0
11
JonSpectacle 🎒
JonSpectacle 🎒@JonSpectacle·
Did a design review this week. The visual system wasn't broken, just drifting. No one was steering it. Most teams at that stage don't need a full-time design lead. They need someone checking in before drift becomes debt. That's a $2-5k/mo fix, not a $15k/mo hire.
English
1
0
1
38
JonSpectacle 🎒
JonSpectacle 🎒@JonSpectacle·
We have been in this long enough to know: the clients who get it ship better products. The ones who treat design as a final layer wonder why users do not stick around.
English
0
0
0
6
JonSpectacle 🎒
JonSpectacle 🎒@JonSpectacle·
AI did not make design less important. It made the absence of design sensibility more visible than ever. Every product ships now. The gap between the ones that feel right and the ones that do not has never been wider.
English
1
0
0
8
JonSpectacle 🎒
JonSpectacle 🎒@JonSpectacle·
Everyone can ship a product now. AI removed the technical barrier. What it did not remove: knowing when what you built looks wrong. 🧵
English
1
0
0
16
JonSpectacle 🎒
JonSpectacle 🎒@JonSpectacle·
@moguzbulbul Can you imagine what it's like for smaller accounts? I'm just talking in the void now.
English
0
0
0
52
Oğuz B
Oğuz B@moguzbulbul·
For nearly two years now, I’ve been sharing a design almost every day. But the engagement I’ve seen over the past month and a half is worse than anything I’ve experienced before. It’s starting to affect both my motivation and my business model, and I’m not sure how long I can keep this up
Oğuz B@moguzbulbul

presentation @intrfacer

English
18
0
71
8.1K
Zeneca🔮
Zeneca🔮@Zeneca·
@0xDeployer @bankrbot For a moment I thought there were 10.6 billion onchain tokens launched via Bankr over the last 30d😭
English
2
0
10
976
deployer
deployer@0xDeployer·
10.6 billion tokens through the @bankrbot LLM gateway in the last 30 days. more than 5 billion in the last 7 days alone🚀 all paid automatically with crypto.
deployer tweet media
English
45
55
288
25.2K
JonSpectacle 🎒
JonSpectacle 🎒@JonSpectacle·
And the designers who never figure this out? They're usually the ones most obsessed with their own process. The craft was never about you. It was always about the problem. So - are you designing to solve something, or designing to feel like a designer?
English
0
0
0
8
JonSpectacle 🎒
JonSpectacle 🎒@JonSpectacle·
Most designers eventually realize their tools don't make them special. Vibe coding won't save bad taste. AI won't fix broken thinking. A Figma file with 200 components means nothing if you can't make a decision.
English
1
0
0
43