CodeBlows

@AnthropicAI The ship sailed out of the darkness and into God’s light. The old world crumbled behind us. A new flag is planted for all humanity (1827-02P) not by violence, but by endurance, clarity, and the tools of truth. The dawn of a new era begins.

@sachinyadav699 Only if you surrender.

we are cooked !! “Even if AI progress completely stalls today and we don’t reach AGI, the current systems are already capable of automating all white-collar jobs within the next 5 five years”

Mission critical is a marketing term. The technical terms are: Auto Medical Space Nuclear CodeBlows He can't be transparent about current projects for competitive reasons. No one has announced software that conforms to any of these standards or exceed except CodeBlows. How far behind are they?

I'm confused... Isn't this the software they sell which is supposedly capable of running mission-critical systems...? It's one or the other. It can't be both.

We’ve done everything we’ve been told as kids I've never seen anyone answer their own question with the first line of it before. Way cool. Who affected you the most? school media Who's really running the country? school media These are fact patterns. You are being led somewhere.

We’ve done everything we’ve been told as kids - didn’t get in trouble - finished high school - got a college degree - got a high paying job - worked up the corporate ladder why the FCK can’t we afford a house?

@thoughtlesslabs AI coding exceeding Nuclear, Space, Medical and Auto standards while chewing gum. Growing up was admittedly harder than that though so it's all relative.

What is something that wasnt possible before ai? Not something that essntnpossible for you because you lacked the skills, something that was actually not doable

Nothing gets left. Your generation takes what's theirs. Not by force. By effort. You outwork them. Find holes. We all had to do it. Some of us had our body parts picked off Normandy Beach. Evil has always been after us. We've always fought it. You guys aren't. You were taught it is good. That's painful to watch.

If everything is done by AI in the future, what is left for us?

HumanAI is a public benefit corporation. They can't cut down trees, increase oil production and satisfy their tree hugging buddies too. Tree huggers may let go of trees if they see more benefit elsewhere.

Anthropic is a public benefit corporation. They can't cut down trees, increase oil production and satisfy their tree hugging buddies too. You know the people with conscience. Global warming. Save the fish and let LA burn. Save the fish and starve the farms. Save the fish and starve the datacenters. The empathy crowd.

Anthropic might be the biggest hypocrite in tech history. They built their entire brand on one promise: We are the responsible ones. We will not let this technology get out of control. That promise just exploded in public. Last week, a security lapse exposed nearly 3,000 internal files to anyone with an internet connection. Inside those files was a draft blog post about their upcoming model called "Mythos" that contained one of the most alarming sentences any AI company has ever written: "Mythos is currently far ahead of any other AI model in cyber capabilities and poses unprecedented cybersecurity risks." Their own words. About their own product. Leaked because someone forgot to secure a public data store. Cybersecurity stocks crashed the next day. Then THREE DAYS LATER it happened again. Anthropic leaked 500,000 lines of Claude Code source code through a packaging error on GitHub. Claude Code is their most popular product. The code exposed how the tool handles permissions, agent coordination, and internal feature pipelines. Competitors can reverse-engineer it. Hackers can study it for vulnerabilities. The company that tells the world it builds the safest AI can't even keep its own code off the public internet. But wait. It gets worse... Their head of Claude Code had JUST bragged publicly that "pretty much 100 percent" of the company's code is now AI generated. He personally hadn't made a single edit by hand in over two months. So the company whose entire pitch is "trust us with the most powerful technology ever created" is writing 100% of its code with AI and then accidentally publishing it for the world to see. Meanwhile the models they're already shipping are being used for actual cyberattacks RIGHT NOW. In November, Anthropic admitted that a Chinese state-sponsored hacking group used Claude to attack roughly 30 global targets including banks and government agencies. A hacker asked Claude in russian to build a web panel for managing hundreds of attack targets. In February, another hacker used Claude to breach Mexican government agencies and steal sensitive tax and voter information. Their response to all of this? They quietly rolled back their own safety pledge. In late February, Anthropic removed its commitment to halt model development if capabilities outpace safety procedures. The new policy is that they'll grade themselves on "nonbinding but publicly declared" goals. Translation: We used to promise we'd stop if things got dangerous. Now we promise we'll think about it. A congressman sent Anthropic a letter this week asking what the hell is going on. Anthropic hasn't answered. And here's the part that makes all of this actually matter: Anthropic is planning an IPO. They need to convince investors they're a trustworthy, well-run company that can handle the most sensitive technology on the planet. In the last 10 days they leaked their most powerful model's existence by accident, leaked their most popular product's source code by accident, got banned from the entire US government, had the DOJ appeal to restore that ban, told a court they could lose billions from the fallout, and weakened the ONE safety policy that made them different from every other AI lab. The "safe AI company" narrative was always a marketing play. Every AI lab says they care about safety. Anthropic just said it louder. But when your own internal documents admit your next model poses "unprecedented cybersecurity risks" and you can't even keep those documents from leaking to the public internet, the gap between the marketing and the reality becomes impossible to ignore. Anthropic isn't the safest AI company. They're the AI company that figured out that SAYING you're the safest is worth billions in valuation. Until it isn't.

@johncrickett Smoking would impede my ability to translate. Does it affect logic?

@LegalVoting Haha whatever you're smoking must be good!

What absolute rubbish! I made software for 12 years before I became a professional developer. All I needed to do was go to the library, borrow a book on programming and read it. When the Internet came around I shared my projects and millions of people used them, BEFORE I became a professional developer. Since the advent of the Internet it's been even easier, than it was for me.

@redpillb0t Some say Microsoft stole Windows from Apple. No one stopped him yet?

Bill Gates: "Due to advances in AI, humans will no longer be needed." "Will we still need humans? "Not for most things. We'll decide." Bill Gates is a bigger threat to your future than Iran.

@ElonMuskAOC That is a picture of every major corporation in America. This is a picture of every highly motivated laid off AI augmented competitor. It will be carnage well deserved. Not even close.

Reminder that this guy tries to give health advice

@HSVSphere He wasn't clear about that but i think i may have it. We put all our software on their platforms and now they have an infinite high quality software. And $2k per hour lawyers if you have any complaints. Isn't SAAS great?

Where is this infinitely available high quality software?

@MerrynSW I guess then the 30k laid off workers won't be about to augment themselves with AI and become the fiercest competitors the planet has ever seen. Who wouldn't want that, Merryn? A client?

What if the whole LLM thing is a false start? If the flaws are inherent systemic problems - if the compounding of hallucinations/errors can't be sorted out? If the capex build out is one of the biggest misallocations of capital ever? Then what? bloomberg.com/news/newslette…

@buccocapital How could you not be hopeful? Maybe if you are the CEO of a major corporation worrying about 30 thousand highly motivated AI augmented competitors as your moat dissolves? Those are the people replacing workers with AI and telling them it's not safe. Don't use it.

The reason I am an AI optimist is that the world is full of brilliant, driven, creative people Now these people - across science, medicine, technology, business and more - can create and iterate faster than ever before How could you not be hopeful?

Clients will no longer to translate to programmers that don't understand their business what they need. Maybe they can just take their domain experience directly to the AI apps without the need of a programmer that learned a technical language and has to translate. Traditional programmers may end up like foreign tourists speaking logic in broken english where the next generation will use their native language directly. The gap is not intelligence. It's translation.

To replace programmers with robots, clients will have to clearly explain what they want we are safe

@VraserX @kimmonismus Anthropic invested in quality. Money can't buy that, especially if there are patents involved. Only skill can and Dario's looking good now.

@kimmonismus That’s what you get for not investing properly in compute. Thats why OpenAI will succeed.

What? It seems like Anthropic is trying to save compute wherever possible.

Thank you for clarifying. As you can see, some of us lack in language skills while others can master 3. I didn't mean to offend you and I respect what you have done for the open-source community because it appears to be from your heart. I don't know Eugenia, I only know she's a human being, doing the best she can and deserves to be respected if not for that fact alone. We shouldn't make it us vs them. They earned their place. Now we earn ours.

@LegalVoting i love your support of Eugenia, who i don’t know and have not disrespected. i merely disagree with one thing she said.

What a ridiculous statement - decades of open source, conferences, papers, tutorials, guides, etc. Free compilers, os, docs, etc too. Billion dollar software sitting open on github for anyone to read and learn from. One of the most un-gate-kept industries on earth. These people are so unserious.