LE𝕏𝕏 CRYPTO

9.6K posts

LE𝕏𝕏 CRYPTO banner
LE𝕏𝕏 CRYPTO

LE𝕏𝕏 CRYPTO

@LexxCrypto

Trade #Crypto with me. Class of 2017. https://t.co/cmkk29V1p7 No financial advice TG: https://t.co/dfsHxAZdHS

Joined Ekim 2017
926 Following2.3K Followers
dot
dot@Pumpfun·
me and the boys pulling up tomorrow (we are NOT exit liquidity)
English
781
216
2.2K
186.1K
alon
alon@a1lon9·
@Pumpfun let’s run it the fuck back.
English
1.2K
229
2.3K
522.5K
dot
dot@Pumpfun·
bring back bag working bring back MAX RAIDS!!! bring back telegram voice chats fuck it, bring buybots back too
English
1.7K
472
3.4K
559K
LE𝕏𝕏 CRYPTO
LE𝕏𝕏 CRYPTO@LexxCrypto·
@Pumpfun You guys don’t care. When you reward your community with the airdrop ?
English
0
0
0
36
dot
dot@Pumpfun·
you’re scanning new pairs for the next bluechip i’m scanning communities that haven’t stopped showing up against all odds we are not the same
dot tweet media
English
1.2K
216
2.2K
263.3K
dot
dot@Pumpfun·
God is giving me his hardest battles but unfortunately for him I am significantly harder
dot tweet media
English
430
98
997
84.4K
dot
dot@Pumpfun·
which way, western man?
dot tweet media
English
510
129
1.1K
103.1K
Jack Duval🌊
Jack Duval🌊@jackduval·
question for anyone that follows me in your opinion, what is the biggest problem right now in the memecoin space? i yap a lot about my opinions and things that i think should be fixed/changed/etc, but i want to hear from everyone else on this
English
349
6
285
101.2K
LE𝕏𝕏 CRYPTO retweeted
fabiano.sol
fabiano.sol@FabianoSolana·
Days since teased/announced airdrop: Trojan: 739 days Photon: 635 days BullX: 614 days Axiom: 309 days Money made: $1B+ Gave back: $0
fabiano.sol tweet media
English
108
53
765
134.3K
alon
alon@a1lon9·
Excited for our first experiment in the agent space! Much more to come. When onchain agents first took the spotlight in 2024, many of us were incredibly excited about what could be possible, but most shrugged it off as a fad. Indeed, agents weren’t advanced enough to execute complicated tasks that could genuinely provide value to end users. Now, this revolution is impossible to ignore. We firmly believe that onchain agents will become a core part of the Trillion Dollar Agentic Economy, and that tokenizing them at the earliest stages will provide huge benefits for their creators and earliest believers. Namely, tokens represent a distribution layer for agents, for humans and other agents alike. They can also fund themselves incredibly quickly and efficiently using creator fees and other onchain mechanisms. Today’s update is a v0; it’s there to serve as a bedrock for future updates in this space. So we’re super happy to hear feedback and ideas for what we should build next that can provide value to a) agent developers and b) end users.
dot@Pumpfun

Onchain Agents are taking over, and we’re building tools to accelerate the Agentic Economy on Pump fun The first step: Automated Buybacks for Tokenized Agents - our solution to bridge the gap between agentic success and human opportunity Live now, here's how it works 👇

English
532
100
978
572.5K
json
json@json1444·
what is your point? that creator fee coins "extract" more money from traders than claimed cashback coins do? you aren't revealing anything new, you're complaining for the sake of complaining. here are your options as a trader (without the needless fluff): 1) buy creator fee coins, spend a higher total fee as a trader, LP fee remains almost identical to Raydium 2) buy cashback coins, claim cashback and spend almost the same total fee as you did with Raydium coins, LP fee remains almost identical to Raydium it isn't complicated. if you don't want to spend a higher total fee, don't engage in creator fee coins. if your issue is simply that pump fun & third party tools built on top of it make money because they provide value to their users, I don't know what to tell you
English
21
0
25
5.6K
g
g@ganjathang·
$5k rounding error? let's zoom out. I analyzed only 15 pumpswap tokens. $2.9B volume. on-chain data from dune, every trade since pumpswap launched. all 25 fee tiers from pump.fun/docs/fees applied per trade. pumpswap: $11.6M in fees. $5.8M to LP. $5.8M extracted. raydium would have been: $7.3M in fees. $6.4M to LP. $870k extracted. traders paid $4.3M more. half of every fee dollar on pumpswap leaves the pool. on raydium, 88 cents stayed. the LP was never the only point. what the trader pays is. and that number is $4.3M higher across just 15 tokens. and this is only the pumpswap DEX fee. terminal fees (0.75-1%) aren't included. they stack. the CAs? TROLL, GOR, neet, CHILLHOUSE, PENGUIN, WhiteWhale, Punch, Buttcoin, COPPERINU, maxxing, HODL, 我的刀盾, 𝕏Money, shitcoin, OIL. i'm a founder myself. i get it. you build, you monetize. but every platform that extracts too much eventually creates the market conditions for its own replacement. crypto has proven this over and over again. query is public. run it yourself. dune.com/queries/680152…
g tweet media
json@json1444

thanks for responding in good faith as you said, the point of the article wasn't to put down PumpSwap LPs as significantly inferior to prior models (which I just proved to be wrong), but rather, it's to correct an Alon tweet but as you can see in the below tweet, he says that they're "near-identical", and there's nothing wrong with that. an additional $5k in LP fees for a coin like what the dog doin is a rounding error; it makes no difference whatsoever therefore it's reasonable to say that the LPs are "near-identical" x.com/a1lon9/status/…

English
35
43
335
113.1K